畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 3725-3739.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.08.044
陈雨1(), 修子清1, MGENIMusa1, 施屹1, 张俊秋2, 蒋小雨2, 吕景智1, 孙雅望1,*(
)
收稿日期:
2023-09-01
出版日期:
2024-08-23
发布日期:
2024-08-28
通讯作者:
孙雅望
E-mail:1833823696@qq.com;syaw507@swu.edu.cn
作者简介:
陈雨(2000-),女,重庆荣昌人,硕士生,主要从事单胃动物肠道健康及免疫状态研究,E-mail:1833823696@qq.com
基金资助:
Yu CHEN1(), Ziqing XIU1, Musa MGENI1, Yi SHI1, Junqiu ZHANG2, Xiaoyu JIANG2, Jingzhi LÜ1, Yawang SUN1,*(
)
Received:
2023-09-01
Online:
2024-08-23
Published:
2024-08-28
Contact:
Yawang SUN
E-mail:1833823696@qq.com;syaw507@swu.edu.cn
摘要:
本试验旨在研究饲粮中添加蒲公英、木通提取物对断奶仔兔生长性能、腹泻情况、肠道形态结构、肠黏膜紧密连接蛋白和肝肠药物转运体蛋白基因表达的影响,探究二者联用对提高中药提取物生物利用度的效果。试验选取120只35日龄断奶仔兔,随机分为4个组,每组设置10个重复,每个重复3只兔。试验包括对照组(基础饲粮)、蒲公英组(基础饲粮添加0.5%蒲公英提取物)、木通组(基础饲粮添加0.5%木通提取物)和蒲公英+木通组(基础饲粮分别添加0.5%蒲公英和木通提取物)。试验时间为28 d。试验结果表明:1)第1周蒲公英组和木通组平均日增重显著高于对照组(P < 0.05),料重比显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。2)蒲公英组仔兔空肠绒毛高度显著高于木通组(P < 0.05)。3)蒲公英+木通组空肠黏膜总黄酮含量显著高于其它各组(P < 0.05)。4)蒲公英+木通组闭合小环蛋白1(Z0-1)基因在回肠的相对表达量显著高于蒲公英组和木通组(P < 0.05)。5)木通组空肠多药耐药相关蛋白2(MRP-2)、有机阴离子转运多肽2B1(organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1, OATP2B1)基因的相对表达量显著低于对照组(P < 0.05),蒲公英+木通组空肠OATP2B1基因相对表达水平显著低于对照组(P < 0.05);蒲公英组和木通组多药耐药相关蛋白3(multidrug resistance-associated protein 3,MRP3)基因在回肠的相对表达量显著低于对照组(P < 0.05);蒲公英+木通组乳腺癌耐药相关蛋白(BCRP)、MRP3基因在肝的相对表达量显著低于对照组(P < 0.05),木通组和蒲公英+木通组OATP2B1基因在肝的相对表达量显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。综上所述,饲粮中分别添加蒲公英和木通提取物对断奶仔兔的生长性能有所改善,同时添加蒲公英和木通提取物能提高空肠组织总黄酮含量,饲粮中添加蒲公英和木通提取物能调节肝和肠黏膜组织中药物转运体基因表达水平。
中图分类号:
陈雨, 修子清, MGENIMusa, 施屹, 张俊秋, 蒋小雨, 吕景智, 孙雅望. 蒲公英与木通提取物对断奶仔兔生长性能、肠道健康和药物转运体基因相对表达量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(8): 3725-3739.
Yu CHEN, Ziqing XIU, Musa MGENI, Yi SHI, Junqiu ZHANG, Xiaoyu JIANG, Jingzhi LÜ, Yawang SUN. Effects of Dandelion and Akebia Extract on Growth Performance, Intestinal Health and Relative Expression of Drug Transporter Genes in Weaned Rabbits[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(8): 3725-3739.
表 2
断奶仔兔腹泻评分标准"
腹泻程度 Diarrhea level | 粪便外观 Appearance of feces | 粪便初水含量/% Initial water content of feces | 评分 Score |
正常Normal | 正常圆球形Normal sphere | <60 | 0 |
轻微腹泻Slight diarrhea | 软、仍有形Soft, shaped | 60~70 | 1 |
中度腹泻Moderate diarrhea | 黏、不成形、粪水无分离现象 Sticky, shapeless, without feces and water separating | 70~80 | 2 |
严重腹泻Severe diarrhea | 液态、不成形、粪水分离现象 Liquid, shapeless, feces and water separated | >80 | 3 |
表 3
实时荧光定量PCR引物序列"
基因 Gene | 登录号 Accession number | 引物序列(5′→3′) Primer sequence | 产物大小/bp Product size |
GAPDH | NM_001082253 | F: TGCCACCCACTCCTCTACCTTCG | 163 |
R: CCGGTGGTTTGAGGGCTCTTACT | |||
claudin1 | NM_001089316 | F: GTCTTCGACTCTTTGCTGAATCT | 169 |
R: CAATGACAGCCATCCGCATC | |||
occludin | XM_008262318 | F: CTTGCCTGGGACAGAACCTA | 121 |
R: AGCCATAACCGTAGCCGTAA | |||
ZO-1 | XM_008269782 | F: GACTGATGCGAAGACGTTGA | 117 |
R: GCAGAATGGATGCTGTCAGA | |||
ABCB1 | NM_001082159 | F: AACTGGAAGGTTCCGGAAAGA | 80 |
R: CTTCTGCTCACGAGTCAGAGACA | |||
BCRP | NC_013683 | F: ATCAGCTCCGTTGGATCATCAGGCG | 494 |
R: AAGCGTGGCCACGGACACTACACTC | |||
MRP2 | XM_008270326 | F: ATGCTGGATAAGTTCTGCAAC | 498 |
R: GCAGGAGTAGGCCAGATTAG | |||
MRP3 | XM_008271295 | F: GCAATTACTCAGAGGAGGACATCTG | 72 |
R: GCTGCGCCCTCACGAA | |||
OATP2B1 | XM_008263935 | F: GCTGTCTGCCGCTACTACGA | 138 |
R: AGCCCTTGCCTCTTTATCC |
表 4
蒲公英、木通提取物对断奶仔兔生产性能的影响"
项目 Item | 组别Group | P值P-value | ||||||
对照组 Control | 蒲公英组 Dandelion group | 木通组 Akebia group | 蒲公英+木通组 Dandelion and akebia group | PD | PA | PD*A | ||
体重/kg BW | ||||||||
0 d | 1.22±0.09 | 1.22±0.06 | 1.22±0.08 | 1.22±0.08 | 0.919 | 0.888 | 0.956 | |
1~7 d | 1.41±0.08 | 1.44±0.04 | 1.45±0.08 | 1.43±0.08 | 0.839 | 0.561 | 0.219 | |
8~14 d | 1.73±0.08 | 1.76±0.05 | 1.77±0.08 | 1.73±0.13 | 0.759 | 1.000 | 0.184 | |
15~21 d | 2.04±0.11 | 2.06±0.14 | 2.07±0.09 | 1.99±0.26 | 0.565 | 0.632 | 0.325 | |
22~28 d | 2.15±0.08 | 2.16±0.07 | 2.17±0.07 | 2.18±0.07 | 0.704 | 0.334 | 0.917 | |
平均日增重/g ADG | ||||||||
1~7 d | 27.93±2.92b | 32.01±3.51a | 33.08±4.28a | 30.53±4.16ab | 0.527 | 0.136 | 0.009 | |
8~14 d | 46.15±8.41 | 45.89±4.62 | 45.96±3.80 | 45.54±3.96 | 0.850 | 0.879 | 0.965 | |
15~21 d | 43.96±17.38 | 42.68±16.38 | 42.1±7.37 | 42.73±15.18 | 0.945 | 0.848 | 0.839 | |
22~28 d | 23.13±6.80 | 23.63±7.96 | 27.00±17.01 | 28.52±10.98 | 0.796 | 0.265 | 0.897 | |
1~28 d | 36.06±3.64 | 36.70±3.89 | 38.03±2.94 | 36.19±1.51 | 0.580 | 0.504 | 0.258 | |
平均日采食量/g ADFI | ||||||||
1~7 d | 115.91±0.90 | 115.70±0.73 | 115.85±0.64 | 115.97±0.72 | 0.835 | 0.660 | 0.494 | |
8~14 d | 129.02±3.13 | 130.00±0.74 | 129.13±2.04 | 130.35±0.74 | 0.087 | 0.713 | 0.853 | |
15~21 d | 138.55±4.58 | 140.34±1.20 | 138.49±5.98 | 137.78±6.67 | 0.741 | 0.420 | 0.442 | |
22~28 d | 148.27±0.74 | 148.24±0.43 | 148.24±0.49 | 148.18±0.85 | 0.838 | 0.840 | 0.952 | |
1~28 d | 132.84±1.87 | 133.61±0.30 | 132.83±1.59 | 133.64±0.31 | 0.075 | 0.985 | 0.959 | |
料重比F/G | ||||||||
1~7 d | 4.20±0.48a | 3.65±0.34b | 3.55±0.40b | 3.86±0.54ab | 0.433 | 0.143 | 0.005 | |
8~14 d | 2.88±0.53 | 2.86±0.28 | 2.83±0.28 | 2.88±0.26 | 0.907 | 0.907 | 0.743 | |
15~21 d | 3.47±0.95 | 3.95±2.24 | 3.39±0.62 | 3.55±1.07 | 0.474 | 0.583 | 0.718 | |
22~28 d | 7.01±2.39 | 6.98±2.40 | 7.37±4.42 | 6.29±3.47 | 0.616 | 0.882 | 0.640 | |
1~28 d | 3.72±0.39 | 3.67±0.37 | 3.51±0.25 | 3.70±0.16 | 0.495 | 0.386 | 0.278 |
表 5
蒲公英、木通提取物对断奶仔兔腹泻、存活情况的影响"
项目 Item | 组别Group | P值P-value | ||||||
对照组 Control | 蒲公英组 Dandelion group | 木通组 Akebia group | 蒲公英+木通组 Dandelion and akebia group | PD | PA | PD*A | ||
腹泻指数Diarrhea index | ||||||||
1~7 d | 0.06±0.14 | 0.10±0.27 | 0.24±0.51 | 0.08±0.19 | 0.555 | 0.42 | 0.315 | |
8~14 d | 0.71±0.71 | 0.19±0.42 | 0.27±0.52 | 0.24±0.24 | 0.100 | 0.234 | 0.141 | |
15~21 d | 0.41±0.62 | 0.46±0.68 | 0.41±0.40 | 0.35±0.40 | 0.949 | 0.758 | 0.758 | |
22~28 d | 0.18±0.38 | 0.38±0.42 | 0.28±0.57 | 0.20±0.47 | 0.689 | 0.789 | 0.353 | |
1~28 d | 0.34±0.36 | 0.28±0.35 | 0.30±0.24 | 0.22±0.19 | 0.453 | 0.584 | 0.892 | |
腹泻率/% Diarrhea rate | ||||||||
1~7 d | 2.86±6.02 | 4.29±9.64 | 11.43±25.02 | 4.76±10.10 | 0.583 | 0.345 | 0.398 | |
8~14 d | 35.71±37.04 | 10.00±19.11 | 14.29±21.30 | 17.46±17.17 | 0.17 | 0.392 | 0.081 | |
15~21 d | 28.57±36.89 | 22.86±32.44 | 35.71±35.15 | 23.81±25.75 | 0.411 | 0.704 | 0.772 | |
22~28 d | 14.00±32.73 | 28.00±30.11 | 18.00±28.98 | 13.33±33.17 | 0.644 | 0.598 | 0.358 | |
1~28 d | 20.29±22.63 | 16.29±15.72 | 19.86±12.91 | 14.84±14.69 | 0.412 | 0.864 | 0.926 | |
存活率/% Survival rate | ||||||||
1~28 d | 86.67±23.31 | 96.67±11.11 | 90.00±16.10 | 96.30±11.11 | 0.126 | 0.777 | 0.724 |
表 6
蒲公英、木通提取物对断奶仔兔肠道黏膜形态的影响"
项目 Item | 组别Group | P值P-value | ||||||
对照组 Control | 蒲公英组 Dandelion group | 木通组 Akebia group | 蒲公英+木通组 Dandelion and akebia group | PD | PA | PD*A | ||
空肠Jejunum | ||||||||
绒毛高度/μm Villus height | 436.66±95.86ab | 476.17±68.45a | 384.47±74.58b | 458.18±69.06ab | 0.033 | 0.176 | 0.506 | |
隐窝深度/μm Crypt depth | 49.90±8.38 | 51.90±9.60 | 49.68±4.36 | 51.07±11.70 | 0.572 | 0.862 | 0.919 | |
绒毛高度/隐窝深度 V/C | 8.93±2.32 | 9.43±2.05 | 7.75±1.43 | 9.45±2.92 | 0.151 | 0.443 | 0.423 | |
回肠Ileum | ||||||||
绒毛高度/μm Villus height | 406.25±67.44 | 406.36±60.21 | 417.60±86.13 | 427.38±78.32 | 0.835 | 0.496 | 0.838 | |
隐窝深度/μm Crypt depth | 44.48±7.03 | 46.31±6.02 | 47.38±10.97 | 45.94±5.43 | 0.938 | 0.605 | 0.504 | |
绒毛高度/隐窝深度 V/C | 9.42±2.57 | 8.89±1.73 | 9.19±2.56 | 9.42±1.87 | 0.835 | 0.838 | 0.599 |
1 | 武拉平, 王建勋, 秦应和. 2022年兔产业生产概况、2023年发展趋势及政策建议[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59 (3): 348- 352. |
WU L P , WANG J X , QIN Y H . Overview of rabbit industry production in 2022, development trend in 2023 and policy suggestions[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59 (3): 348- 352. | |
2 | 谷子林. 断乳仔兔腹泻发生机制及生物活性物质的调控研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2004. |
GU Z L. The nosogenesis of diarrhea and the regulation of bio-active substances on weanling rabbits[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2004. (in Chinese) | |
3 | 马长旺, 吴敏秋. 引起兔腹泻的原因分析与防治对策[J]. 当代畜牧, 2013, (3): 28- 31. |
MA C W , WU M Q . Analysis of causes of rabbit diarrhea and prevention and control measures[J]. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2013, (3): 28- 31. | |
4 | 王晓娟, 年夫照, 夏运生, 等. 抗生素使用现状及其在生态环境系统的行为研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020, (6): 286- 292. |
WANG X J , NIAN F Z , XIA Y S , et al. Current status of antibiotic use and its behavior in ecological system[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2020, (6): 286- 292. | |
5 |
KHAN F A , MAALIK A , MURTAZA G . Inhibitory mechanism against oxidative stress of caffeic acid[J]. J Food Drug Anal, 2016, 24 (4): 695- 702.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.05.003 |
6 |
TOUAIBIA M , JEAN-FRANCOIS J , DOIRON J . Caffeic acid, a versatile pharmacophore: an overview[J]. Mini-Rev Med Chem, 2011, 11 (8): 695- 713.
doi: 10.2174/138955711796268750 |
7 |
XIAO J B , MUZASHVILI T S , GEORGIEV M I . Advances in the biotechnological glycosylation of valuable flavonoids[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2014, 32 (6): 1145- 1156.
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.006 |
8 |
YAO L H , JIANG Y M , SHI J , et al. Flavonoids in food and their health benefits[J]. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 2004, 59 (3): 113- 122.
doi: 10.1007/s11130-004-0049-7 |
9 | 赵阳, 刘娜, 王园, 等. 蒲公英的活性成分及其在动物生产应用中的研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44 (1): 113- 116. |
ZHAO Y , LIU N , WANG Y , et al. Active ingredients of dandelion and its research progress in animal production and application[J]. Feed Research, 2021, 44 (1): 113- 116. | |
10 | 杨锐, 李金良, 李旭廷, 等. 蒲公英粗多糖对断奶至3月龄生长肉兔生长性能及免疫功能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25 (11): 2770- 2774. |
YANG R , LI J L , LI X T , et al. Effects of Taraxacum polysaccharides on growth performance and immune function of growing meat rabbits from weaner to 3 months of age[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013, 25 (11): 2770- 2774. | |
11 | 李玉荣. 饲粮添加蒲公英粉对肥育猪生长性能和生化指标影响的研究[J]. 养猪, 2019, (6): 21- 22. |
LI Y R . Effects of dietary dandelion powder on growth performance and biochemical indices of finishing pigs[J]. Swine Production, 2019, (6): 21- 22. | |
12 | 李婧雯, 包怡红. 不同溶剂的蒲公英根提取物的抗氧化活性及降糖能力比较分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2020, 36 (5): 64- 72. |
LI J W , BAO Y H . Comparative analysis of antioxidant and hypoglycemic capabilities of Taraxacum mongolicum root extracts in different solvents[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2020, 36 (5): 64- 72. | |
13 | 吴振宁, 祁龙凯, 陈地灵. 茯苓提取物对高脂饮食致肠道菌群失调小鼠的影响[J]. 中国现代中药, 2020, 22 (11): 1822- 1829. |
WU Z N , QI L K , CHEN D L . Effect of Poria cocos extracts on dysbacteria induced by high-fat diet in mice[J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2020, 22 (11): 1822- 1829. | |
14 | 吴娟, 谢晋, 张群林, 等. 中药引经理论的现代研究进展和思路[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2016, 41 (13): 2428- 2434. |
WU J , XIE J , ZHANG Q L , et al. Research progress on meridian-guiding theory of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2016, 41 (13): 2428- 2434. | |
15 | 刘树民, 王秋月, 卢芳, 等. 中药引经药性理论溯本寻源与现代研究评述[J]. 中草药, 2020, 51 (19): 5099- 5104. |
LIU S M , WANG Q Y , LU F , et al. Tracing origin and review of modern research on meridian guide theory of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2020, 51 (19): 5099- 5104. | |
16 |
KÖNIG J , MÜLLER F , FROMM M F . Transporters and drug-drug interactions: important determinants of drug disposition and effects[J]. Pharmacol Rev, 2013, 65 (3): 944- 966.
doi: 10.1124/pr.113.007518 |
17 |
MINKO T , DHARAP S S , PAKUNLU R I , et al. Molecular targeting of drug delivery systems to cancer[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2004, 5 (4): 389- 406.
doi: 10.2174/1389450043345443 |
18 | 冯丽敏. 基于药物转运蛋白的醋柴胡引经作用机制的探讨[D]. 广州: 广州中医药大学, 2014. |
FENG L M. Study on the meridian-guiding mechanism of Vinegar-baked Radix Bupleuri with drug transporters[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
19 | 许子建. 十二经引经药与泻火药[J]. 云南中医学院学报, 1978, (1): 10- 31. |
XU Z J . The twelve channels of acupuncture and catharsis[J]. Journal of Yunnan College of Chinese Medicine, 1978, (1): 10- 31. | |
20 | 刘桂艳, 王晔, 马双成, 等. 木通属植物木通化学成分及药理活性研究概况[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2004, 39 (5): 330-332, 352. |
LIU G Y , WANG Y , MA S C , et al. Overview on the chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of the plants from Akebia[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2004, 39 (5): 330-332, 352. | |
21 | DU J R , LONG F Y , CHEN C . Research progress on natural triterpenoid saponins in the chemoprevention and chemotherapy of cancer[J]. Enzymes, 2014, 36, 95- 130. |
22 |
FRANCIS G , KEREM Z , MAKKAR H P S , et al. The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review[J]. Br J Nutr, 2002, 88 (6): 587- 605.
doi: 10.1079/BJN2002725 |
23 | 许腾. 中草药添加剂对断奶獭兔生产性能及腹泻的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40 (11): 93- 96. |
XU T . Effects of Chinese herbal additive on production performance and diarrhea index of weaning rex rabbits[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2013, 40 (11): 93- 96. | |
24 | 史自涛, 姚焰础, 江山, 等. 粪肠球菌替代抗生素对断奶仔猪生长性能、腹泻率、血液生化指标和免疫器官的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27 (6): 1832- 1840. |
SHI Z T , YAO Y C , JIANG S , et al. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis substitute for antibiotic on growth performance, diarrhea rate, blood biochemical parameters and immune organs of weaner piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015, 27 (6): 1832- 1840. | |
25 |
LIU L , ZUO W S , LI F C . Dietary addition of Artemisia argyi reduces diarrhea and modulates the gut immune function without affecting growth performances of rabbits after weaning[J]. J Anim Sci, 2019, 97 (4): 1693- 1700.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz047 |
26 |
HALWACHS S , KNEUER C , GOHLSCH K , et al. The ABCG2 efflux transporter from rabbit placenta: cloning and functional characterization[J]. Placenta, 2016, 38, 8- 15.
doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.12.005 |
27 |
KARLA P K , PAL D , MITRA A K . Molecular evidence and functional expression of multidrug resistance associated protein (MRP) in rabbit corneal epithelial cells[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2007, 84 (1): 53- 60.
doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.08.015 |
28 |
VANWIJNGAERDEN Y M , LANGOUCHE L , DERDE S , et al. Impact of parenteral nutrition versus fasting on hepatic bile acid production and transport in a rabbit model of prolonged critical illness[J]. Shock, 2014, 41 (1): 48- 54.
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000046 |
29 | 王留, 刘秀玲, 王向国. 蒲公英水提物对断奶仔猪腹泻率及血清炎性因子的影响[J]. 养猪, 2019, (2): 52- 53. |
WANG L , LIU X L , WANG X G . Effects of dandelion water extract on diarrhea rate and serum inflammatory factors of weaned piglets[J]. Swine Production, 2019, (2): 52- 53. | |
30 | 周博文. 蒲公英绿原酸的提取及其提取物对犊牛生长性能和血液免疫指标的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2016. |
ZHOU B W. Effects of dandelion chlorogenic acid extraction and its extract on growth performance and blood immune indexes of calves[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
31 |
CSERNUS B , CZEGLÉDI L . Physiological, antimicrobial, intestine morphological, and immunological effects of fructooligosaccharides in pigs[J]. Arch Anim Breed, 2020, 63 (2): 325- 335.
doi: 10.5194/aab-63-325-2020 |
32 |
LILBURN M S , LOEFFLER S . Early intestinal growth and development in poultry[J]. Poult Sci, 2015, 94 (7): 1569- 1576.
doi: 10.3382/ps/pev104 |
33 | 梁小瑞. 十味补益类、清热类中药对肉鸡肠黏膜屏障功能的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020. |
LIANG X R. Effects of ten tonic and heat-clearing Chinese medicine on intestinal mucosal barrier function of broilers[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
34 | 师少军. 肠道"药物代谢酶-外排转运体偶联"对黄酮类化合物生物利用度影响的研究进展[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2019, 39 (20): 2107- 2112. |
SHI S J . Recent advances in intestinal "drug-metabolizing enzyme-efflux transporter coupling" and effect on bioavailability of flavonoids[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2019, 39 (20): 2107- 2112. | |
35 |
SUZUKI T . Regulation of intestinal epithelial permeability by tight junctions[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2013, 70 (4): 631- 659.
doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1070-x |
36 | 呙于明, 刘丹, 张炳坤. 家禽肠道屏障功能及其营养调控[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26 (10): 3091- 3100. |
GUO Y M , LIU D , ZHANG B K . Intestinal barrier of poultry: function and modulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26 (10): 3091- 3100. | |
37 |
NABEKURA T , YAMAKI T , UENO K , et al. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein 1 by dietary phytochemicals[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2008, 62 (5): 867- 873.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0676-4 |
38 |
OH Y , JEONG Y S , KIM M S , et al. Inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 and 1B3 by betulinic acid: effects of preincubation and albumin in the media[J]. J Pharm Sci, 2018, 107 (6): 1713- 1723.
doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.02.010 |
39 |
ZHOU Y Q , LI W Z , CHEN L , et al. Enhancement of intestinal absorption of akebia saponin D by borneol and probenecid in situ and in vitro[J]. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol, 2010, 29 (3): 229- 234.
doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2010.01.004 |
[1] | 刘彬, 刘彦, 郑琛, 冯涛. 氨基葡萄糖对断奶仔猪生长性能、抗氧化能力及免疫功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(7): 3246-3254. |
[2] | 罗志斌, 欧慧敏, 李建中, 谭支良, 焦金真. 添加过瘤胃氨基酸低蛋白质饲粮对呼伦贝尔羊生长性能、养分表观消化率及肉品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2498-2509. |
[3] | 李亚霖, 甄士博, 曹林, 孙逢雪, 王利华. 植物乳杆菌及其后生元对育成期母貂生长性能、免疫功能及肠道健康的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2530-2539. |
[4] | 王吉, 周馨妍, 郭芳瑞, 徐秋容, 武东怡, 毛妍, 袁志航, 易金娥, 文利新, 邬静. 紫花地丁对热应激下肉鸡生长性能、肉品质和肠道菌群的改善作用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2761-2774. |
[5] | 张吉贤, 范定坤, 付域泽, 焦帅, 马涛, 毕研亮, 张乃锋. 后生素调控动物肠道健康的作用机制及应用进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1926-1935. |
[6] | 牛晓雨, 邢媛媛, 李大彪. 植物活性成分对动物肠道屏障功能的调控作用及其机制[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1467-1477. |
[7] | 雷艳茹, 胡晓玉, 许春红, 张晨曦, 杜文苹, 王阳光, 李东华, 孙桂荣, 李文婷, 康相涛. 5个贵妃鸡配套系生长发育规律、屠宰性能和肉品质比较分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1521-1535. |
[8] | 李铁, 齐梦迪, 张克英, 王建萍, 白世平, 曾秋凤, 彭焕伟, 玄月, 吕莉, 丁雪梅. 育雏育成期饲粮添加益生菌对蛋鸡生长性能、血清指标、肠道健康及后续生产性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1062-1076. |
[9] | 牟湘钰, 徐云若, 胡静怡, 周欣妍, 朱勇文. 家禽支链氨基酸营养需要研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 31-38. |
[10] | 付曦瑶, 陈丽红, 陈小丽, 孙伟丽, 郭肖兰. 11~17周龄雌性雉鸡蛋白质适宜需要量研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2910-2923. |
[11] | 杨子辉, 董朕, 伍蕙岚, 谭斌, 曾建国. 基于网络药理学分析蒲公英抗氧化功能的物质基础与作用机制[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(5): 2170-2185. |
[12] | 王明礼, 王猛, 李延森, 徐善金, 韩国锋, 李春梅. 不同粗蛋白水平人工鸽乳对乳鸽生长性能、血清抗氧化水平及肠道发育的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(4): 1545-1554. |
[13] | 王威皓, 段艳, 王宏迪, 窦露, 刘婷, 康乐天, 孙立娜, 敖特恒格日乐, 靳烨. 饲养方式对苏尼特羊生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和瘤胃菌群的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(3): 1085-1094. |
[14] | 颜琼娴, 陈文勋, 惠浩阳, 彭灿, 汤少勋, 周小玲, 谭支良. 玉米赤霉烯酮对山羊生长性能、胃肠道发酵模式和菌群结构的影响研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(3): 1109-1123. |
[15] | 罗菊, 毛嘉妮, 夏银钊, 杨震国. circRNAs对哺乳动物肠道屏障功能的调控作用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(11): 4439-4448. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||