饲养方式对苏尼特羊生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和瘤胃菌群的影响

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.03.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在研究不同饲养方式(放牧和舍饲)对苏尼特羊生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和瘤胃菌群的影响。选取健康的3月龄苏尼特羊24只，平均体重为(20.16±1.56)kg，随机分为2组，每组12只羊。对照组(舍饲组)饲喂基础饲粮，试验组(放牧组)采食天然牧草。预试期7 d，正试期90 d。结果表明：1)舍饲组苏尼特羊终末体重、平均日增重和胸围显著高于放牧组(P<0.05)。2)舍饲组苏尼特羊胴体重、净肉重、屠宰率和肉骨比显著高于放牧组(P<0.05)。3)舍饲组的背最长肌亮度(L^*)值、蒸煮损失率和剪切力值显著高于放牧组(P<0.05)，背最长肌pH_{24 h}显著低于放牧组(P<0.05)。4)与放牧饲养相比，舍饲组的Shannon指数显著降低(P<0.05)，门水平上，舍饲显著提高了瘤胃中拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria)的相对丰度，显著降低了瘤胃中厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)的相对丰度(P<0.05)。在属水平上，舍饲显著提高了瘤胃中普雷沃氏菌属_1(Prevotella_1)的相对丰度(P<0.05)，显著降低了瘤胃中理研菌科_RC9_肠道群属(Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group)和丁酸弧菌属(Butyrivibrio_2)的相对丰度(P<0.05)。综上所述，舍饲降低了苏尼特羊的瘤胃菌群多样性，改善了育肥增重效果和屠宰性能，提高了苏尼特羊背最长肌的剪切力和蒸煮损失率，但劣化了羊肉的加工品质和食用口感。

关键词: 饲养方式, 生长性能, 屠宰性能, 肉品质, 瘤胃菌群

Abstract: This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of feeding regimens on growth performance, slaughter performance, meat quality and the rumen bacteria community of Sunit sheep. Twenty-four healthy Sunit sheep aged 3 months with the average body weight of (20.16±1.56) kg were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups with 12 sheep in each group. The control group (confinement group) was fed a basal diet and the experimental group (pasture group) was fed natural forage. The pre-feeding period was 7 days and the trial period was 90 days. The results were shown as follows:1) The final body weight, average daily gain and chest circumference of the Sunit sheep in the confinement group were significantly higher than those in the pasture group (P<0.05). 2) The carcass weight, net meat weight, dressing percentage and meat to bone ratio were significantly higher in the confinement group than in the pasture group (P<0.05). 3)The longissimus dorsi muscle brightness (L^*) value, cooking loss and shear force of the confinement group were significantly higher than those of the pasture group (P<0.05), while the pH_{24 h} of longissimus dorsi muscle was significantly lower than that of the pasture group (P<0.05). 4) Compared to pasture feeding, the Shannon index of the confinement group was significantly decreased (P<0.05). At the phylum level, confinement feeding significantly increased the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria (P<0.05), and significantly decreased the relative abundance of Firmicutes in the rumen (P<0.05). At the genus level, confinement feeding significantly increased the relative abundance of Prevotella_1 (P<0.05), and significantly decreased the relative abundances of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Butyrivibrio_2 in the rumen (P<0.05). Overall, confinement feeding decreases the rumen microbial diversity of Sunit sheep, improves the weight gain effect and slaughter performance of Sunit sheep, enhances cooking loss and shear force of longissimus dorsi muscle, but degrades the processing quality and eating taste of mutton.

Key words: feeding regimens, growth performance, slaughter performance, meat quality, rumen bacteria community

中图分类号:

S826.4

王威皓, 段艳, 王宏迪, 窦露, 刘婷, 康乐天, 孙立娜, 敖特恒格日乐, 靳烨. 饲养方式对苏尼特羊生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质和瘤胃菌群的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(3): 1085-1094.

WANG Weihao, DUAN Yan, WANG Hongdi, DOU Lu, LIU Ting, KANG Letian, SUN Lina, AO Tehenggerile, JIN Ye. Effects of Feeding Regimens on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality and Rumen Bacteria Community of Sunit Sheep[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(3): 1085-1094.

参考文献 39

[1]	旭日干.中国肉用型羊主导品种及其应用展望[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2016:57-59.BOU S.China's leading breeds of meat-type sheep and their application prospects[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2016:57-59.(in Chinese)
[2]	WANG H R,CHEN Q,CHEN L M,et al.Effects of dietary physically effective neutral detergent fiber content on the feeding behavior,digestibility,and growth of 8-to 10-month-old Holstein replacement heifers[J].J Dairy Sci,2017,100(2):1161-1169.
[3]	XIAO J X,ALUGONGO G M,CHUNG R,et al.Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on dairy calves:Ruminal fermentation,gastrointestinal morphology,and microbial community[J].J Dairy Sci,2016,99(7):5401-5412.
[4]	ZHANG R Y,ZHU W Y,JIANG L S,et al.Comparative metabolome analysis of ruminal changes in Holstein dairy cows fed low-or high-concentrate diets[J].Metabolomics,2017,13(6):74.
[5]	谭子璇,柏雪,罗璠,等.不同饲养方式对牦牛瘤胃微生物区系及肌肉品质的影响[J].食品科学,2020,41(15):79-87.TAN Z X,BAI X,LUO F,et al.Effects of different feeding systems on rumen microflora and muscle quality of Yaks[J].Food Science,2020,41(15):79-87.(in Chinese)
[6]	李蒋伟.日粮精粗比对育肥藏羊消化道组织形态及微生物多样性的影响[D].西宁:青海大学,2021.LI J W.Effects of dietary concentrate to roughage ratio on digestive tract morphology and microbial diversity of fattening Tibetan Sheep[D].Xining:Qinghai University,2021.(in Chinese)
[7]	WOOD J D,RICHARDSON R I,NUTE G R,et al.Effects of fatty acids on meat quality:A review[J].Meat Sci,2004,66(1):21-32.
[8]	王敏.放牧与舍饲对肉牛生产性能和肉品质影响的比较研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2020.WANG M.A comparative study on the effects of grazing and stall feeding on the performance and meat quality of beef cattle[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2020.(in Chinese)
[9]	赵有璋.羊生产学[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2011.ZHAO Y Z.Sheep production[M].3rd ed.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2011.(in Chinese)
[10]	侯艳茹,苏琳,侯普馨,等.饲养方式对苏尼特羊肌纤维组成和肉品质的影响及其调控机理[J].食品科学,2021,42(7):83-89.HOU Y R,SU L,HOU P X,et al.Effect of feeding regimens on muscle fiber type composition and meat quality of Sunit sheep and underlying regulatory mechanism[J].Food Science,2021,42(7):83-89.(in Chinese)
[11]	王柏辉.饲养方式对苏尼特羊胃肠道菌群、脂肪酸代谢和羊肉品质的影响及机理研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019.WANG B H.Effects of feeding regimens on gastrointestinal microbiota,fatty acid metabolism and meat quality of Sunit sheep and its underlying mechanism[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2019.(in Chinese)
[12]	吴铁梅.不同饲养模式对绒山羊羔羊育肥性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.WU T M.Effects of different feeding modes on fattening performance and slaughter performance and meat quality of young cashmere goats[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2013.(in Chinese)
[13]	PRIOLO A,MICOL D,AGABRIEL J,et al.Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems on lamb carcass and meat quality[J].Meat Sci,2002,62(2):179-185.
[14]	PERLO F,BONATO P,TEIRA G,et al.Meat quality of lambs produced in the Mesopotamia region of Argentina finished on different diets[J].Meat Sci,2008,79(3):576-581.
[15]	SAHU J,KOLEY K M,SAHU B D.Attribution of antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Cassia tora extract toward its growth promoting effect in broiler birds[J].Vet World,2017,10(2):221-226.
[16]	武晓东,赵俊星,刘文忠,等.日粮中胡麻饼代替豆粕对绵羊生产性能、肉品质、脂肪酸含量及血液生化指标的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2017,48(7):1260-1270.WU X D,ZHAO J X,LIU W Z,et al.Effect of replacement of soybean meal by oil cake of flax seed in diet on growth performance,meat quality,fatty acid content and blood biochemical indicators of sheep[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2017,48(7):1260-1270.(in Chinese)
[17]	荷花.饲养模式对绒山羊成年母羊育肥和屠宰性能的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.HE H.Effects of feeding mode on fattening performance and slaughter performance of adult female Cashmere goats[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2013.(in Chinese)
[18]	和世春,程月,李清,等.不同饲养方式对江城牛生长性能和屠宰性能的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(15):226-229.HE S C,CHENG Y,LI Q,et al.Effects of different feeding methods on growth performance and slaughter performance of Jiangcheng cattle[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2020,48(15):226-229.(in Chinese)
[19]	陈中卫,王瑞秀,刘强,等.低聚壳聚糖替代抗生素对樱桃谷肉鸭生长性能、屠宰性能、肠道屏障功能和肌肉品质的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2021,52(7):1927-1941.CHEN Z W,WANG R X,LIU Q,et al.Effects of chitosan oligosaccharide supplementation as an alternative to antibiotic on the growth performance,slaughter performance,intestinal barrier function and meat quality of Cherry Valley ducks[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2021,52(7):1927-1941.(in Chinese)
[20]	侯艳茹,马晓冰,苏琳,等.饲养方式对宰后苏尼特羊肉一磷酸腺苷激活的蛋白激酶活力及糖酵解的影响[J].食品科学,2018,39(11):15-20.HOU Y R,MA X B,SU L,et al.Effect of different feeding methods on AMP-activated protein kinase activity and glycolysis of postmortem Sunit Sheep[J].Food Science,2018,39(11):15-20.(in Chinese)
[21]	杨昌福,柏雪,高彦华,等.全放牧与舍饲育肥对牦牛肉品质及安全性的影响[J].畜牧与兽医,2019,51(1):23-28.YANG C F,BAI X,GAO Y H,et al.Effects of free-grazing and house-feeding on meat quality and safety in domesticated yaks[J].Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2019,51(1):23-28.(in Chinese)
[22]	胡猛,张文举,尹君亮,等.育成荷斯坦奶公牛与其他3个品种牛的肉品质比较研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2013,40(3):95-99.HU M,ZHANG W J,YIN J L,et al.Study on beef quality of growing holstein dairy bull compared with other three breeds[J].China Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2013,40(3):95-99.(in Chinese)
[23]	罗玉龙.放牧与舍饲条件下苏尼特羊肉风味差异及形成机制研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019.LUO Y L.Difference of meat flavor in Sunit lamb (concentrated vs. grazing) and primary formation mechanism[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2019.(in Chinese)
[24]	MARTÍNEZ-CEREZO S,SAÑUDO C,MEDEL I,et al.Breed,slaughter weight and ageing time effects on sensory characteristics of lamb[J].Meat Sci,2005,69(3):571-578.
[25]	韦肖,张建童,龙唐晖,等.日粮能量水平对湖羊瘤胃发酵特性和微生物组成的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2022,53(9):3042-3051.WEI X,ZHANG J T,LONG T H,et al.Effects of dietary energy level on rumen fermentation characteristics and microbial composition of Hu Sheep[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2022,53(9):3042-3051.(in Chinese)
[26]	张晨光.放牧和舍饲对藏山羊生长发育、肉品质及胃肠道细菌区系的影响[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2020.ZHANG C G.Growth and development,meat quality,gastrointestinal bacteria of grazing and drylot raised Tibetan goat[D].Xianyang:Northwest A&F University,2020.(in Chinese)
[27]	SHABAT S K B,SASSON G,ORON-FAIGENBOIM A,et al.Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants[J].ISME J,2016,10(12):2958-2972.
[28]	CLEMMONS B A,VOY B H,MYER P R.Altering the gut microbiome of cattle:Considerations of host-microbiome interactions for persistent microbiome manipulation[J].Microb Ecol,2019,77(2):523-536.
[29]	BRULC J M,ANTONOPOULOS D A,MILLER M E B,et al.Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2009,106(6):1948-1953.
[30]	FU Z L,XU X F,ZHANG J,et al.Effect of different feeding methods on rumen microbes in growing Chinese Tan sheep[J].R Bras Zootec,2020,49:e20190258.
[31]	CUI X X,WANG Z F,YAN T H,et al.Rumen bacterial diversity of Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries) associated with different forage types on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Can J Microbiol,2019,65(12):859-869.
[32]	PITTA D W,INDUGU N,KUMAR S,et al.Metagenomic assessment of the functional potential of the rumen microbiome in Holstein dairy cows[J].Anaerobe,2016,38:50-60.
[33]	WANG Y Y,CAO P H,WANG L,et al.Bacterial community diversity associated with different levels of dietary nutrition in the rumen of sheep[J].Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,2017,101(9):3717-3728.
[34]	AVGUSTIN G,WALLACE R J,FLINT H J.Phenotypic diversity among ruminal isolates of Prevotella ruminicola:Proposal of Prevotella brevis sp. nov.,Prevotella bryantii sp. nov.,and Prevotella albensis sp.nov. and redefinition of Prevotella ruminicola[J].Int J Syst Bacteriol,1997,47(2):284-288.
[35]	PURUSHE J,FOUTS D E,MORRISON M,et al.Comparative genome analysis of Prevotella ruminicola and Prevotella bryantii:insights into their environmental niche[J].Microb Ecol,2010,60(4):721-729.
[36]	COE M L,NAGARAJA T G,SUN Y D,et al.Effect of virginiamycin on ruminal fermentation in cattle during adaptation to a high concentrate diet and during an induced acidosis[J].J Anim Sci,1999,77(8):2259-2268.
[37]	ZHOU L Y,XIAO X H,ZHANG Q,et al.Improved glucose and lipid metabolism in the early life of female offspring by maternal dietary genistein is associated with alterations in the gut microbiota[J].Front Endocrinol,2018,9:516.
[38]	WANG B H,LUO Y L,WANG Y,et al.Rumen bacteria and meat fatty acid composition of Sunit sheep reared under different feeding regimens in China[J].J Sci Food Agric,2021,101(3):1100-1110.
[39]	张双双,杨承剑,梁明振,等.瘤胃溶纤维丁酸弧菌调控共轭亚油酸合成的研究进展[J].畜牧与兽医,2014,46(2):105-108.ZHANG S S,YANG C J,LIANG M Z,et al.Research progress on regulation of conjugated linoleic acid synthesis by rumen fibrinobutyribrio[J].Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2014,46(2):105-108.(in Chinese)