金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香母猪养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪微生物区系的影响

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2025.07.022

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (7): 3290-3304.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2025.07.022

金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香母猪养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪微生物区系的影响

熊平文¹(), 徐川辉¹, 艾高祥¹, 季华员¹, 胡艳², 陈将¹, 宋琼莉¹, 宋文静¹, 韦启鹏¹, 陈小连¹^,*(), 邹志恒¹^,*(), 陈和洪³

1. 江西省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所畜禽绿色健康养殖江西省重点实验室，南昌 330200
2. 赣州市畜牧水产研究所，赣州 341401
3. 安远县大竹湖生态农业有限公司，赣州 342111

收稿日期:2024-07-29 出版日期:2025-07-23 发布日期:2025-07-25
通讯作者: 陈小连,邹志恒 E-mail:xiongpingwen1990@163.com;xiaolianchen@126.com;zouzhihengxms@163.com
作者简介:熊平文(1990-)，男，江西南昌人，助理研究员，硕士，主要从事动物营养与饲料资源开发研究，E-mail：xiongpingwen1990@163.com
基金资助:
江西省重点研发计划(20232BBF60014)；江西省现代农业产业技术体系生猪营养调控与饲料高效利用岗位；江西现代农业科技创新专项(JXSNKYJCRC202332)；2023年赣鄱俊才支持计划·高层次高技能领军人才培养项目

Effects of Golden Buckwheat Stem and Leaf Meal on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Serum Biochemical Indices, Fecal Microflora Composition of Gannan Tibetan Sows

XIONG Pingwen¹(), XU Chuanhui¹, AI Gaoxiang¹, JI Huayuan¹, HU Yan², CHEN Jiang¹, SONG Qiongli¹, SONG Wenjing¹, CHEN Xiaolian¹, CHEN Xiaolian¹^,*(), ZOU Zhiheng¹^,*(), CHEN Hehong³

1. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Green and Healthy Breeding of Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, China
2. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Aquaculture of Ganzhou City, Ganzhou 341401, China
3. Anyuan County Dazhu Lake Ecological Agriculture Co., Ltd, Ganzhou 342111, China

Received:2024-07-29 Online:2025-07-23 Published:2025-07-25
Contact: CHEN Xiaolian, ZOU Zhiheng E-mail:xiongpingwen1990@163.com;xiaolianchen@126.com;zouzhihengxms@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在研究饲粮中添加金荞麦茎叶粉(GBSLM)对赣南藏香猪初产母猪养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪微生物区系的影响。选取健康且体况和预产期相近的初产妊娠赣南藏香母猪18头，随机分为3组，每组6个重复，每个重复1头猪。对照组(CON组)饲喂基础饲粮，试验组(T1和T2组)分别饲喂在基础饲粮中添加10%和20% GBSLM的试验饲粮。试验自妊娠第70天开始至分娩后第28天结束。结果显示：1)与CON组相比，在母猪妊娠第105天，T1和T2组的总能和干物质表观消化率显著提高(P < 0.05)，T1组的粗脂肪和磷表观消化率显著提高(P < 0.05)，T2组的粗蛋白质表观消化率显著降低(P < 0.05)，在母猪分娩后第15天，T2组的总能、干物质、粗脂肪和粗灰分表观消化率显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。2)与CON组相比，T1和T2组母猪妊娠第105天的血清总蛋白含量显著提高(P < 0.05)，血清葡萄糖含量显著降低(P < 0.05)。3)厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门和螺旋菌门是3个组共有的优势菌门。T1和T2组母猪妊娠第105天的粪中拟杆菌门相对丰度显著高于CON组(P < 0.05)，厚壁菌门相对丰度低于CON组，但差异不显著(P>0.05)。T2组母猪分娩后第15天粪中放线菌门相对丰度显著低于CON组(P < 0.05)。链球菌属、狭义梭菌属1和土芽孢杆菌属是3个组共有的优势菌属。T1和T2组母猪妊娠第105天的粪中UCG-005菌属、理研菌科RC9肠道群属和普雷沃氏菌科_NK3B31群菌属的相对丰度均显著高于CON组(P < 0.05)，链球菌属的相对丰度显著低于CON组(P < 0.05)。综上所述，饲粮中添加金荞麦茎叶粉可提高母猪总能、干物质、粗脂肪、磷和粗灰分养分表观消化率和血清TP含量，调节菌群丰富度和多样性。在本试验条件下，金荞麦茎叶粉可运用到赣南藏香母猪饲粮中，添加量以10%效果最优。

关键词: 金荞麦茎叶粉, 赣南藏香母猪, 养分表观消化率, 血清生化指标, 粪微生物

Abstract:

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of golden buckwheat stem and leaf meal (GBSLM) supplementation in Gannan Tibetan primiparous sows diet by determining nutrient apparent digestibility, serum biochemical indices and fecal microflora composition. Eighteen healthy pregnant primiparous Gannan Tibetan sows with similar body condition and expected delivery date were randomly allocated to 3 groups with 6 replicates in per group and 1 pig in per replicate. Pigs in the control group (CON group) were fed only the basal diet, while the other groups (T1 and T2 groups) were fed the basal diets supplemented with 10% and 20% GBSLM, respectively. The trial period was from day 70 of gestation to 28 day after delivery. The results showed that: 1) Compared with the CON group, the apparent digestibility of gross energy (GE) and dry matter (DM) of sows at 105 day of gestation in T1 and T2 groups were significantly increased (P < 0.05), ether extract (EE) and phorsphorous in T1 group increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) in T2 group was pronouncedly decreased (P < 0.05). At 15 day after delivery, sows in T2 group had significantly higher apparent digestibility of GE, DM, EE and Ash than those of the CON group (P < 0.05). 2) In comparison to the CON group, the T1 and T2 groups dramatically heighted the TP content (P < 0.05) and lowered the GLU content (P < 0.05) in serum of sows after day 105 of gestation. 3) Firmicutes, Bacteroidota and Spirochaetota were the dominant bacteria phyla shared by the three groups. On the 105th day of pregnancy, the relative abundance of Bacteroidota in feces of sows in T1 and T2 groups were markedly higher than that in CON group (P < 0.05). Although the relative abundance of Firmicutes were lower in the T1 and T2 groups compared to the CON group, no significant effects were observed (P>0.05). Furthermore, contrasted with the CON group, the T2 group statistically diminished the relative abundance of Actinobacteria in feces of sows at day 15 after parturition (P < 0.05). Streptococcus, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Terrisporobacter were the dominant genera shared by the three groups. Moreover, on the 105th day of pregnancy, the T1 and T2 groups had an apparently higher fecal UCG-005, Rikenellaceae_RC9_ gut_group and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group relative abundance (P < 0.05) and an obviously lower fecal Streptococcus relative abundance compared to the CON group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, diets supplemented with GBSLM are conducive to elevating the apparent nutrients digestibility of GE, DM, EE, P and Ash, increasing the serum level of TP, regulating the richness and diversity of intestinal flora in Gannan Tibetan sows. Under the conditions of this experiment, GBSLM can be used in the diet of Gannan Tibetan sows and the addition of 10% GBSLM is the optimal dose.

Key words: golden buckwheat stem and leaf meal, Gannan Tibetan sows, apparent nutrient digestibility, serum biochemical indices, fecal microorganisms

中图分类号:

S828.5

熊平文, 徐川辉, 艾高祥, 季华员, 胡艳, 陈将, 宋琼莉, 宋文静, 韦启鹏, 陈小连, 邹志恒, 陈和洪. 金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香母猪养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪微生物区系的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(7): 3290-3304.

XIONG Pingwen, XU Chuanhui, AI Gaoxiang, JI Huayuan, HU Yan, CHEN Jiang, SONG Qiongli, SONG Wenjing, CHEN Xiaolian, CHEN Xiaolian, ZOU Zhiheng, CHEN Hehong. Effects of Golden Buckwheat Stem and Leaf Meal on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Serum Biochemical Indices, Fecal Microflora Composition of Gannan Tibetan Sows[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2025, 56(7): 3290-3304.

图/表 12

表 1

表 2

表 3

图 1

表 4

图 2

图 3

图 4

表 5

图 5

图 6

表 6

参考文献 40

1	陈翠莲, 汤洪敏. 金荞麦芽尖开发为功能茶的基础研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54 (10): 2463- 2465.
	CHEN C L , TANG H M . Fundamental research on developing the shoot tips of Fagopyrum dibotrys to be a functional tea[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54 (10): 2463- 2465.
2	向清华, 邓蓉, 简志银, 等. 黔中金荞麦品种比较研究[J]. 种子, 2021, 40 (7): 115- 119.
	XIANG Q H , DENG R , JIAN Z Y , et al. Comparative study on wild buckwheat rhizome varieties in central Guizhou[J]. Seed, 2021, 40 (7): 115- 119.
3	张蓉, 陈光吉, 尚以顺, 等. 鲜饲金荞麦对热应激蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质和血清指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29 (9): 179- 189.
	ZHANG R , CHEN G J , SHANG Y S , et al. Effects of fresh feeding Fagopyrum dibotrys on performance, egg quality and serum index of heat stressed laying hens[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29 (9): 179- 189.
4	侯振平, 郑霞, 陈青, 等. 金荞麦的营养价值、提取物生物活性及其在动物生产中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33 (6): 3019- 3027.
	HOU Z P , ZHENG X , CHEN Q , et al. Nutritional value, bioactivity of extract and application in animal poduction of Fagopyrum dibotrys[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33 (6): 3019- 3027.
5	夏林, 简志银, 邓蓉, 等. 黔中金荞麦在贵州不同海拔地区的生长生产试验[J]. 贵州畜牧兽医, 2021, 45 (1): 60- 63.
	XIA L , JIAN Z Y , DENG R , et al. Growth and production experiment of golden buckwheat in central Guizhou at different altitudes in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 45 (1): 60- 63.
6	陈康林, 桂国弘, 申露露, 等. 添加金荞麦茎叶粉对生长育肥猪肉质和血液生化指标的影响[J]. 贵州畜牧兽医, 2020, 44 (1): 5- 8.
	CHEN K L , GUI G H , SHEN L L , et al. Effects of adding buckwheat stem and blood biochemical and leaf powder on meat quality indexes in growing pigs[J]. Guizhou Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 44 (1): 5- 8.
7	潘朝旺, 戢丹菊. 金荞麦提取物对膝骨关节炎大鼠IL-1β、TNF-α、IL-6的影响[J]. 鄂州大学学报, 2021, 28 (6): 107- 109.
	PAN C W , JI D J . Effects of Fagopyrum cymosum extract on IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 in rats with Knee Osteoarthritis[J]. Journal of Ezhou University, 2021, 28 (6): 107- 109.
8	杨亭, 陈小连, 胡利珍, 等. 金荞麦的药理作用及在动物生产中的应用[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40 (9): 2411- 2423.
	YANG T , CHEN X L , HU L Z , et al. Advances in studies on the pharmacological effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys and its application in animal production[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40 (9): 2411- 2423.
9	张蓉, 陈光吉, 尚以顺, 等. 夏季高温条件下鲜饲金荞麦对蛋鸡肠道微生物区系及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2024, 45 (3): 8- 15.
	ZHANG R , CHEN G J , SHANG Y S , et al. Effects of feeding fresh Fagopyrum dibotrys on intestinal microflora and related gene expression of laying hens under high temperature in summer[J]. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2024, 45 (3): 8- 15.
10	史开志, 张雄, 杜春林, 等. 黔金荞麦1号对贵州省地方猪的饲用价值评估[J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43 (7): 32- 34.
	SHI K Z , ZHANG X , DU C L , et al. Investigate the effects of Qian Fagopyrum cymosum (Trev.) Meisn No.1 in Guizhou native porcine culture[J]. Feed Research, 2020, 43 (7): 32- 34.
11	秦杨, 谭露霖, 吴仙, 等. 饲粮添加油脂和金荞麦对肉鸡产肉性能、脏器指数、肠道发育和血液免疫细胞的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2023, 45 (1): 70- 75.
	QIN Y , TAN L L , WU X , et al. Effects of dietary two types of oils and Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) hara on meat performance, visceral index, intestinal development and blood immune cells in broilers[J]. China Poultry, 2023, 45 (1): 70- 75.
12	张涛, 周思旋, 唐远江, 等. 黔中金荞麦提取物安全性评价及对大鼠肠道菌群的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52 (11): 146- 156.
	ZHANG T , ZHOU S X , TANG Y J , et al. Safety evaluation of extracts of Fagopyrum dibotrys Qian Zhong and the effect on intestinal flora of rats[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52 (11): 146- 156.
13	张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 3版北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007: 49- 80.
	ZHANG L Y . Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology[M]. 3rd ed Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007: 49- 80.
14	苏莹莹, 刘旭乐, 赵淑敏, 等. 膨化苜蓿草粉-亚麻籽对母猪养分表观消化率以及母猪、仔猪免疫功能和血清激素含量的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33 (12): 7148- 7159.
	SU Y Y , LIU X L , ZHAO S M , et al. Effects of extruded alfalfa meal-flaxseed on apparent nutrient digestibility of sows and immune function and serum hormone contents of sows and piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33 (12): 7148- 7159.
15	熊平文, 陈小连, 胡利珍, 等. 金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香猪繁殖性能、免疫和抗氧化功能以及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2023, 59 (9): 269- 276.
	XIONG P W , CHEN X L , HU L Z , et al. Effects of golden buckwheat stem and leaf meal on reproductive performance, immune indices, antioxidant capacity and intestinal flora of Gannan Tibetan pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 59 (9): 269- 276.
16	李世歌, 毛君婷, 史开志. 金荞麦草粉对贵州地方猪的育肥效果评价[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45 (4): 32- 34.
	LI S G , MAO J T , SHI K Z . Evaluation on fattening effect of Fagopyrum dibotrys powder on Guizhou local pigs[J]. Feed Research, 2022, 45 (4): 32- 34.
17	谭露霖, 张定红, 张洁, 等. 金荞麦对肉仔鸡生长性能、免疫功能和肠道形态结构的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2017, 44 (12): 3505- 3511.
	TAN L L , ZHANG D H , ZHANG J , et al. Effect of Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) Hara on growth performance, immune function and intestinal structure of broilers[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 44 (12): 3505- 3511.
18	谭露霖, 张定红, 张洁, 等. 金荞麦对肉仔鸡抗氧化功能、肠道屏障功能及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47 (21): 232- 235.
	TAN L L , ZHANG D H , ZHANG J , et al. Effects of golden buckwheat on antioxidant function, intestinal barrier function and serum biochemical indexes of broilers[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47 (21): 232- 235.
19	谭露霖, 罗文菊, 艾蓉, 等. 黔金荞麦1号为主的中草药饲料添加剂对仔猪肠道有害菌及免疫因子的影响[J]. 贵州畜牧兽医, 2016, 40 (4): 20- 22.
	TAN L L , LUO W J , AI R , et al. The Effect of chinese herbal medicinal feed additive main containing Qian Fagopyrum dibotrys No.1 on the intestinal harmful bacteria and immune factor in piglets[J]. GuiZhou Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 40 (4): 20- 22.
20	张蓉, 陈光吉, 聂朝松, 等. 环境温度和金荞麦提取物添加水平对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质及血清生化和免疫指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35 (9): 5708- 5723.
	ZHANG R , CHEN G J , NIE C S , et al. Effects of ambient temperature and Fagopyrum dibotrys extract supplemental level on performance, egg quality and serum biochemical and immue indices of laying hens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35 (9): 5708- 5723.
21	王银玲, 薛玉洋, 孙浩彬, 等. 桑叶提取物对黄羽肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、器官指数、血清生化指标和营养物质表观消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35 (8): 5049- 5058.
	WANG Y L , XUE Y Y , SUN H B , et al. Effects of mulberry leaf extract on growth performance, slaughter performance, organ indexes, serum biochemical indexes and nutrient apparent digestibility of yellow feather broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35 (8): 5049- 5058.
22	梁旭东, 刘兰, 蔡宇威, 等. 饲料中添加金荞麦对生长育肥猪生产性能和血液生理生化指标的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017 (9): 135- 136.
	LIANG X D , LIU L , CAI Y W , et al. Effects of golden buckwheat on performance and blood physiological and biochemical of growing-finishing pigs[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017 (9): 135- 136.
23	ZHANG L L , HE Y , SHENG F , et al. Towards a better understanding of Fagopyrum dibotrys: a systematic review[J]. Chin Med, 2021, 16 (1): 89.
24	阮洪生, 季涛, 吉薇薇, 等. 金荞麦黄酮对2型糖尿病小鼠糖脂代谢及氧化应激的影响[J]. 中药药理与临床, 2017, 33 (05): 73- 76.
	RUAN H S , JI T , JI W W , et al. Effects of flavonoids from Fagopyri dibotryis rhizoma on the glycolipid metabolism and antioxidation in type 2 diabetic rats[J]. Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, 2017, 33 (05): 73- 76.
25	CHEN C X , LI A L . Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes involved in proanthocyanidin accumulation in the rhizomes of Fagopyrum dibotrys and an irradiation-induced mutant[J]. Front Physiol, 2016, 7, 100.
26	LIAO R R , XIE X H , LV Y H , et al. Ages of weaning influence the gut microbiota diversity and function in Chongming white goats[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2021, 105 (9): 3649- 3658.
27	CHEN C Y , ZHOU Y Y , FU H , et al. Expanded catalog of microbial genes and metagenome-assembled genomes from the pig gut microbiome[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12 (1): 1106.
28	MAMUN M A A , SANDEMAN M , RAYMENT P , et al. The composition and stability of the faecal microbiota of Merino sheep[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2020, 128 (1): 280- 291.
29	QIN J , LI R , RAES J , et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing[J]. Nature, 2010, 464 (7285): 59- 65.
30	宇晓军, 李丹丹, 王路义, 等. 抗菌肽对育成期母貂生长性能、养分表观消化率及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34 (2): 1194- 1204.
	YU X J , LI D D , WANG L Y , et al. Effects of antimicrobial peptide on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibilities and intestinal flora of growing female minks[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34 (2): 1194- 1204.
31	RUIZ L , MARGOLLES A , SÁNCHEZ B . Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium[J]. Front Microbiol, 2013, 4, 396.
32	郑先瑞, 卓明雪, 纪金丽, 等. 皖南黑猪不同生长阶段血清免疫指标及肠道菌群的特征分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54 (9): 3770- 3783. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.09.017
	ZHENG X R , ZHUO M X , JI J L , et al. Characteristics of serum immune indices and intestinal microbiota of Wannan black pigs at different growth stages[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54 (9): 3770- 3783. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.09.017
33	QUAN J P , WU Z F , YE Y , et al. Metagenomic characterization of intestinal regions in pigs with contrasting feed efficiency[J]. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11, 32.
34	PENG M , WANG Z , PENG S , et al. Dietary supplementation with the extract from Eucommia ulmoides leaves changed epithelial restitution and gut microbial community and composition of weanling piglets[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14 (9): e223002.
35	陈小连, 周泉勇, 宋文静, 等. 赣南藏香猪与杜长大商品猪胴体性状和肉品质比较分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2020, 42 (2): 282- 290.
	CHEN X L , ZHOU Q Y , SONG W J , et al. Comparison of carcass traits and meat quality between Tibetan pigs in south Jiangxi and Duroc×Yorkshire×Landrace commercial pigs[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2020, 42 (2): 282- 290.
36	谭占坤, 商振达, 褚瑰燕, 等. 藏猪对饲粮纤维的消化及其与肠道微生物的相关性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53 (9): 3063- 3078. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.09.022
	TAN Z K , SHANG Z D , CHU G Y , et al. Sudy on dietary fiber digestion and its correlation with intestinal microbiome of Tibetan pigs[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53 (9): 3063- 3078. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.09.022
37	ZHU Y , WANG Z , HU R , et al. Comparative study of the bacterial communities throughout the gastrointestinal tract in two beef cattle breeds[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2021, 105, 313- 325.
38	COX L M , YAMANISHI S , SOHN J , et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences[J]. Cell, 2014, 158 (4): 705- 721.
39	杨东吉, 张静静, 朱随亮, 等. 酿酒酵母培养物替代抗生素对断奶仔猪生长性能、养分消化率及盲肠微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32 (1): 138- 147.
	YANG D J , ZHANG J J , ZHU S L , et al. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture instead of antibiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibilities and cecal microflora of weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32 (1): 138- 147.
40	LI F , GUAN L L . Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2017, 83 (9): e17- e61.

项目 Item	组别 Group
	妊娠期Pregnancy			泌乳期Lactation
	CON	T1	T2	CON	T1	T2
原料Ingredient
玉米Corn	55.15	54.45	53.85	53.40	52.05	50.60
豆粕Soybean meal	12.20	11.80	11.40	17.20	17.70	18.20
金荞麦茎叶粉GBSLM	0.00	10.00	20.00	0.00	10.00	20.00
小麦麸Wheat bran	15.00	10.00	5.00	16.50	8.25	0.00
统糠Rice bran	10.00	5.00	0.00	5.00	2.50	0.00
豆油Soybean oil	2.05	3.05	4.05	2.10	3.60	5.10
磷酸氢钙CaHPO₄	0.80	0.70	0.60	1.00	0.90	0.80
石粉Limestone	0.40	0.60	0.70	0.40	0.60	0.90
食盐NaCl	0.30	0.30	0.30	0.30	0.30	0.30
胆碱Choline	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10
预混料Compound-premix¹⁾	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00	4.00
合计Total	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
营养水平Nutrient level²⁾
表观消化能/(MJ·kg^-1) ADE	12.14	12.13	12.12	12.56	12.55	12.54
粗蛋白质CP	13.03	13.03	13.04	15.02	15.02	15.01
粗纤维CF	9.24	8.37	7.49	8.37	7.36	6.35
钙Ca	0.64	0.65	0.63	0.70	0.69	0.71
总磷TP	0.44	0.44	0.44	0.49	0.49	0.50
赖氨酸Lys	0.57	0.55	0.53	0.70	0.69	0.68
蛋氨酸Met	0.22	0.20	0.18	0.24	0.22	0.20
色氨酸Trp	0.14	0.13	0.11	0.18	0.16	0.14
苏氨酸Thr	0.54	0.48	0.43	0.58	0.55	0.52

项目 Item	组别 Group			P值 P-value
项目 Item	CON	T1	T2	P值 P-value
妊娠第105天Day 105 of pregnant
总能GE	70.43±3.86^b	76.94±2.43^a	76.17±3.00^a	0.009
干物质DM	68.61±3.80^b	75.73±1.94^a	75.22±3.18^a	0.003
粗蛋白质CP	75.73±2.64^a	76.73±2.22^a	70.33±4.18^b	0.010
粗脂肪EE	35.26±8.83^b	49.90±4.65^a	40.54±10.30^ab	0.029
粗灰分Ash	34.45±5.52	41.88±3.31	39.62±4.77	0.068
钙Ca	30.25±8.36	38.12±7.39	26.98±5.10	0.056
磷P	38.36±6.32^b	50.00±4.15^a	42.76±4.49^ab	0.006
分娩后第15天Day 15 after parturition
总能GE	73.86±1.77^b	76.05±1.37^b	82.10±2.84^a	< 0.001
干物质DM	72.35±2.17^b	74.91±1.75^b	80.82±3.31^a	< 0.001
粗蛋白质CP	79.37±2.09	76.35±2.04	77.09±4.98	0.322
粗脂肪EE	37.10±4.48^b	44.21±6.73^ab	57.2±17.33^a	0.033
粗灰分Ash	35.99±4.87^b	36.14±4.73^b	48.00±5.45^a	0.003
钙Ca	40.26±3.86	32.89±7.02	39.44±6.66	0.151
磷P	48.23±6.30^ab	43.70±3.29^b	55.10±6.27^a	0.013

项目 Item	组别 Group			P值 P-value
项目 Item	CON	T1	T2	P值 P-value
妊娠第105天Day 105 of pregnant
碱性磷酸酶/(U·L^-1) AKP	79.96±3.79	78.16±6.75	78.90±2.58	0.834
谷丙转氨酶/(U·L^-1) ALT	37.47±1.05	35.80±1.92	35.67±2.38	0.265
谷草转氨酶/(U·L^-1) AST	106.36±6.02	101.01±6.00	100.59±3.85	0.205
总蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) TP	58.45±0.77^b	60.23±0.57^a	60.98±0.73^a	< 0.001
白蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) ALB	30.44±0.42	30.67±0.41	30.85±0.34	0.291
球蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) GLB	38.68±2.27	40.43±2.26	40.69±2.56	0.365
血糖/(mg·dL^-1) GLU	116.5±9.11^a	103.23±4.18^bc	99.61±6.74^c	0.004
尿素氮/(mmol·L^-1) BUN	4.54±0.36	4.63±0.11	4.46±0.10	0.456
总胆固醇/(mmol·L^-1) T-CHO	1.23±0.06	1.17±0.11	1.20±0.06	0.522
甘油三酯/(mmol·L^-1) TG	0.21±0.02	0.20±0.02	0.20±0.02	0.799
总胆红素/(μmol·L^-1) TBILI	6.84±0.79	6.28±0.96	6.03±0.47	0.271
分娩后第15天Day 15 after parturition
碱性磷酸酶/(U·L^-1) AKP	76.66±4.07	74.77±2.51	73.81±3.46	0.413
谷丙转氨酶/(U·L^-1) ALT	38.48±1.26	36.26±2.11	35.83±2.60	0.130
谷草转氨酶/(U·L^-1) AST	101.8±6.17	98.16±3.05	95.34±4.56	0.127
总蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) TP	58.68±3.04	60.59±1.72	60.51±3.36	0.466
白蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) ALB	35.95±1.20	37.37±1.83	36.86±0.90	0.281
球蛋白/(mmol·L^-1) GLB	39.33±0.81	40.52±1.37	41.56±2.04	0.097
血糖/(mg·dL^-1) GLU	104.65±5.42	97.46±4.12	100.28±3.57	0.056
尿素氮/(mmol·L^-1) BUN	5.00±0.33	4.86±0.45	4.44±0.33	0.087
总胆固醇/(mmol·L^-1) T-CHO	1.27±0.06	1.18±0.10	1.19±0.08	0.179
甘油三酯/(mmol·L^-1) TG	0.21±0.02	0.19±0.02	0.20±0.02	0.536
总胆红素/(μmol·L^-1) TBILI	6.06±0.44	5.73±0.28	5.82±0.37	0.349

项目 Item	组别 Group			P值 P-value
项目 Item	CON	T1	T2	P值 P-value
妊娠第105天Day 105 of pregnant
Observed_species	762.20^b±45.27	851.50^a±57.29	847.20^ab±46.76	0.023
Shannon指数Shannon index	4.89^b±0.73	6.23^a±0.42	6.58^a±0.56	0.001
Simpson指数Simpson index	0.83^b±0.10	0.95^a±0.03	0.96^a±0.02	0.006
Chao1指数Chao1 index	853.86±64.31	944.92±81.50	901.14±50.82	0.125
Ace指数Ace index	867.16±53.76	942.98±71.51	910.60±46.39	0.147
分娩后第15天Day 15 after parturition
Observed_species	834±90.16	851.83±45.31	824±86.49	0.823
Shannon指数Shannon index	6.10±1.10	6.61±0.42	5.86±1.17	0.420
Simpson指数Simpson index	0.93±0.08	0.97±0.01	0.89±0.13	0.380
Chao1指数Chao1 index	900.61±107.46	919.47±41.43	888.78±97.51	0.833
Ace指数Ace index	924.14±111.35	923.97±41.65	898.13±90.29	0.850

项目 Item	组别 Group			P值 P-value
项目 Item	CON	T1	T2	P值 P-value
妊娠第105天Day 105 of pregnant
厚壁菌门Firmicutes	79.17±4.22	65.52±9.69	63.78±11.00	0.031
拟杆菌门Bacteroidota	9.72^b±1.29	22.08^a±5.28	20.93^a±7.40	0.004
螺旋菌门Spirochaetota	2.73±1.53	5.26±3.11	6.36±5.55	0.318
广古菌门Euryarchaeota	5.36±4.57	3.10±3.70	3.11±3.15	0.566
疣微菌门Verrucomicrobiota	0.19±0.05	0.44±0.32	1.19±1.80	0.301
未鉴别菌门Unidentified_Bacteria	1.23±0.39	1.81±0.55	2.14±1.04	0.151
变形菌门Proteobacteria	0.40±0.42	0.32±0.19	0.53±0.30	0.561
放线菌门Actinobacteriota	0.41±0.21	0.33±0.15	0.48±0.24	0.493
纤维杆菌门Fibrobacterota	0.03±0.02	0.12±0.07	0.17±0.12	0.051
分娩后第15天Day 15 after parturition
厚壁菌门Firmicutes	66.79±12.60	60.99±14.34	62.08±16.83	0.797
拟杆菌门Bacteroidota	17.98±9.35	26.04±10.35	21.64±14.69	0.533
螺旋菌门Spirochaetota	6.19±5.59	6.31±4.47	9.59±4.90	0.479
广古菌门Euryarchaeota	4.73±3.71	1.73±2.59	3.08±3.90	0.372
变形菌门Proteobacteria	1.55±2.39	0.61±0.51	0.44±0.18	0.405
未鉴别菌门Unidentified_Bacteria	1.38±0.60	1.79±0.40	1.20±0.38	0.139
放线菌门Actinobacteriota	0.15^ab±0.05	0.53^a±0.35	0.09^b±0.11	0.013
弯曲杆菌门Campylobacterota	0.03±0.04	0.18±0.36	0.10±0.14	0.612
纤维杆菌门Fibrobacterota	0.11±0.07	0.39±0.22	0.40±0.33	0.108
疣微菌门Verrucomicrobiota	0.16±0.06	0.36±0.17	0.35±0.23	0.140

金荞麦茎叶粉对赣南藏香母猪养分表观消化率、血清生化指标及粪微生物区系的影响

Effects of Golden Buckwheat Stem and Leaf Meal on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Serum Biochemical Indices, Fecal Microflora Composition of Gannan Tibetan Sows

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏传琛, 焦静娅, 王永帅, 罗朋娜, 昌兴海, 黄艳群. 导入25%洛岛红鸡血缘对河南斗鸡相关指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1007-1018.
[2]	付曦瑶, 陈丽红, 陈小丽, 孙伟丽, 郭肖兰. 11~17周龄雌性雉鸡蛋白质适宜需要量研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2910-2923.
[3]	武殿阁, 夏苗, 颜安, 江皓天, 樊佳奇, 周思源, 韦旭, 刘树栋, 陈宝江. 香芹酚对肉兔生长性能、养分表观消化率及肠道形态、短链脂肪酸含量和菌群相关指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4233-4246.
[4]	郭子涵, 蒋琪琪, 王彬, 赵娜, 贺稚非, 李洪军, 吕景智. 光照节律对肉兔生长性能、血清生化指标、肉品质和动物福利的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(5): 1500-1508.
[5]	敖蕊, 许晨远, 朱崇淼, 姚文, 郑卫江. 海兰灰蛋鸡患输卵管囊肿对屠宰性能、器官指数、血清生化指标及组织病理学的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(3): 990-998.
[6]	关鹏, 王晨昱, 胡鲜, 何流琴, 李建中, 李铁军. 低蛋白日粮补充天冬氨酸对断奶至育肥阶段猪生长性能及肉品质性状的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(10): 3500-3510.
[7]	王瑞秀, 陈中卫, 刘强, 庄苏. 合生素对樱桃谷肉鸭肌肉品质、机体抗氧化性能和免疫功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(9): 2522-2533.
[8]	陈中卫, 王瑞秀, 刘强, 刘峰, 庄苏. 低聚壳聚糖替代抗生素对樱桃谷肉鸭生长性能、屠宰性能、肠道屏障功能和肌肉品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(7): 1927-1941.
[9]	吴正可, 张安荣, 陈志敏, 常文环, 刘国华, 蔡辉益, 郑爱娟. 凝结芽孢杆菌对肉鸡生长性能、血清生化指标和胫骨强度指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(4): 1031-1041.
[10]	王猛, 李尚民, 沈丹, 韩国锋, 李延森, 窦新红, 李春梅. 饲粮不同比例青贮玉米对仔鹅生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(12): 3501-3511.
[11]	张振宇, 梁春年, 姚喜喜, 马晓明, 丁考仁青, 褚敏, 吴晓云, 包鹏甲, 阎萍. 日粮不同营养水平对牦牛生产性能、屠宰指标和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(1): 135-143.
[12]	钟伟, 穆琳琳, 韩菲菲, 张新宇, 杜东升, 李光玉. 饲喂水平对育成生长期雄性北极狐生长性能、血液生化指标及机体能量沉积的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(3): 546-555.
[13]	韩菲菲, 钟伟, 张新宇, 蔡煕姮, 穆琳琳, 陈双双, 李光玉. 饲粮代谢能和粗蛋白质水平对冬毛生长期雄性水貂生产性能、营养物质消化率、血清生化指标和脏器指数的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(12): 3087-3100.
[14]	司丙文, 徐文财, 郭江鹏, 崔凯, 王淑艳, 屠焰, 刁其玉. 杂交构树青贮对杜寒杂交肉羊生产性能、血清指标及背最长肌脂肪酸组成的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(7): 1424-1432.
[15]	柏妍, 郎侠, 王彩莲, 梁婷玉, 刘婷, 宫旭胤, 高良霜, 石晓雷, 吴建平. 饲粮中添加牛至精油和莫能菌素对荷斯坦犊牛血清生化指标、消化酶活性及瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(12): 2458-2469.

项目 Item	组别 Group			P值 P-value
项目 Item	CON	T1	T2	P值 P-value
妊娠第105天Day 105 of pregnant
链球菌属Streptococcus	37.06^a±15.06	11.97^b±11.90	4.69^b±6.88	0.002
狭义梭菌属1 Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1	8.64±3.11	10.27±5.35	8.78±3.55	0.776
土芽孢杆菌属Terrisporobacter	9.31±3.05	11.48±2.86	13.09±5.18	0.316
密螺旋体属Treponema	2.72±1.53	5.24±3.11	6.34±5.53	0.319
甲烷短杆菌属Methanobrevibacter	5.36±4.57	3.10±3.70	3.11±3.15	0.566
UCG-005菌属UCG-005	2.89^b±1.29	4.78^a±1.70	6.39^a±1.45	0.010
乳酸菌属Lactobacillus	3.06±2.58	3.93±2.13	3.12±3.00	0.821
苏黎世杆菌属Turicibacter	2.51±1.53	3.24±1.76	2.97±2.01	0.798
普雷沃氏菌科NK3B31群菌属Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group	0.65^b±0.29	1.48^a±0.81	2.09^a±1.67	0.042
理研菌科RC9肠道群属Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group	0.74^b±0.16	1.86^a±0.95	2.04^a ±1.29	0.038
分娩后第15天Day 15 after parturition
链球菌属Streptococcus	12.78±16.39	4.41±2.12	22.78±20.21	0.151
狭义梭菌属1 Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1	10.96±2.92	10.87±6.35	4.58±2.54	0.064
土芽孢杆菌属Terrisporobacter	7.36±3.42	9.05±4.96	5.10±3.07	0.297
密螺旋体属Treponema	6.17±5.58	6.28±4.48	9.54±4.90	0.487
苏黎世杆菌属Turicibacter	3.30±1.57	3.53±2.50	3.24±4.99	0.988
乳酸菌属Lactobacillus	4.41±4.54	3.19±2.40	1.99±2.02	0.493
甲烷短杆菌属Methanobrevibacter	4.73±3.72	1.73±2.59	3.08±3.90	0.374
普雷沃氏菌科_UCG-001菌属Prevotellaceae_UCG-001	1.01±0.98	3.28±3.51	1.24±1.31	0.243
UCG-005菌属UCG-005	3.63±1.93	5.80±1.32	4.61±1.42	0.108
UCG-002菌属UCG-002	2.80±2.07	1.68±0.81	0.64±0.59	0.062