结合GWAS先验标记信息的肉鸡RFI性状全基因组选择研究

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.10.013

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the prediction accuracy for chicken residual feed intake (RFI) trait estimated by genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) estimates combined with prior marker information from genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method, and provide theoretical and technical support for improving the accuracy of genomic selection. In this study, 2 510 individuals from 3 generations of Guangxi Jinling flower chicken were selected, including 1 648 roosters and 862 hens, using residual feed intake from 42 to 56 days of age as target trait. The experimental population was randomly divided into two groups, one of which was used as a priori marker information discovery group for GWAS analysis, and the most significant top 5%, top 10%, top 15% and top 20% SNPs were selected as prior marker; in another group, the genetic parameters and prediction accuracy were estimated using different prior marker information. The accuracy was obtained by 10 repetitions of the five-fold cross-validation method, and then the two groups were cross-validated. The results showed that the heritability of RFI calculated by GBLUP was 0.153, and the prediction accuracy was 0.387-0.429. The heritability of RFI calculated by the genomic selection method combined with GWAS prior marker information was 0.139-0.157, and the prediction accuracy was 0.401-0.448. Incorporating the top 10%-top 15% SNPs with the most significant P values in the GWAS results as priors into the genomic selection model can improve the prediction accuracy of RFI by 2.10%-5.17%.

Key words: genomic selection, GWAS, prior marker information, prediction accuracy

CLC Number:

S831.2

DU Yongwang, HUANG Chao, WANG Yidong, LI Sen, WEN Jie, CHEN Zhiwu, ZHAO Guiping, ZHENG Maiqing. Genomic Selection for RFI in Broiler Combining GWAS Prior Marker Information[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(10): 3403-3411.

References 43

[1]	HAVENSTEIN G B, FERKET P R, QURESHI M A.Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets[J].Poult Sci, 2003, 82(10):1500-1508.
[2]	MEUWISSEN T, HAYES B, GODDARD M.Genomic selection:a paradigm shift in animal breeding[J].Anim Front, 2016, 6(1):6-14.
[3]	HEFFNER E L, SORRELLS M E, JANNINK J L.Genomic selection for crop improvement[J].Crop Sci, 2009, 49(1):1-12.
[4]	MEUWISSEN T H E, HAYES B J, GODDARD M E.Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps[J].Genetics, 2001, 157(4):1819-1829.
[5]	SCHAEFFER L R.Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle[J].J Anim Breed Genet, 2006, 123(4):218-223.
[6]	尹立林, 马云龙, 项韬, 等.全基因组选择模型研究进展及展望[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(2):233-242.YIN L L, MA Y L, XIANG T, et al.The progress and prospect of genomic selection models[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019, 50(2):233-242.(in Chinese)
[7]	刘建, 朱吉, 彭英林, 等.按家系分组湘村黑猪的繁育性能分析[J].养猪, 2015(6):50-56.LIU J, ZHU J, PENG Y L, et al.Study on reproductive performances of xiangcun black pig grouped by families[J].Swine Production, 2015(6):50-56.(in Chinese)
[8]	ESFANDYARI H, SØRENSEN A C, BIJMA P.A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance[J].Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47:76.
[9]	SONG H L, YE S P, JIANG Y F, et al.Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs[J].Genet Sel Evol, 2019, 51(1):58.
[10]	赵晓铎, 张鹏, 吕昕哲, 等.全基因组选择技术在牧场的应用[J].中国奶牛, 2019(7):21-24.ZHAO X D, ZHANG P, LV X Z, et al.Application of whole genome selection technology in dairy farms[J].China Dairy Cattle, 2019(7):21-24.(in Chinese)
[11]	LOURENCO D A L, TSURUTA S, FRAGOMENI B O, et al.Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus[J].J Anim Sci, 2015, 93(6):2653-2662.
[12]	王志英, 李学武, 王俊英, 等.山羊基因组选择的展望[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(2):94-100.WANG Z Y, LI X W, WANG J Y, et al.The research progress of genomic selection in goats[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University:Natural Science Edition, 2019, 40(2):94-100.(in Chinese)
[13]	赵志达, 张莉.基因组选择在绵羊育种中的应用[J].遗传, 2019, 41(4):293-303.ZHAO Z D, ZHANG L.Applications of genome selection in sheep breeding[J].Hereditas, 2019, 41(4):293-303.(in Chinese)
[14]	郭其新, 徐璐, 鲁伟, 等.GBLUP技术在鸡品种选育中的应用效果研究[J].中国家禽, 2016, 38(20):6-9.GUO Q X, XU L, LU W, et al.Study on chicken breeding efficiency using GBLUP technique[J].China Poultry, 2016, 38(20):6-9.(in Chinese)
[15]	WOLC A, ZHAO H H, ARANGO J, et al.Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens[J].Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47(1):59.
[16]	GODDARD M E, KEMPER K E, MACLEOD I M, et al.Genetics of complex traits:Prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture[J].Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci, 2016, 283(1835):20160569.
[17]	YANG J, ZENG J, GODDARD M E, et al.Concepts, estimation and interpretation of SNP-based heritability[J].Nat Genet, 2017, 49(9):1304-1310.
[18]	DE LOS CAMPOS G, VAZQUEZ A I, FERNANDO R, et al.Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor[J].PLoS Genet, 2013, 9(7):e1003608.
[19]	GAO N, LI J Q, HE J L, et al.Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model[J].BMC Genet, 2015, 16:120.
[20]	MOGHADDAR N, KHANSEFID M, VAN DER WERF J H J, et al.Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations[J].Genet Sel Evol, 2019, 51(1):72.
[21]	ZHANG Z, OBER U, ERBE M, et al.Improving the accuracy of whole genome prediction for complex traits using the results of genome wide association studies[J].PLoS One, 2014, 9(3):e93017.
[22]	LOPES M S, BOVENHUIS H, VAN SON M, et al.Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions[J]. J Anim Sci, 2017, 95(1):59-71.
[23]	KOCH R M, SWIGER L A, CHAMBERS D, et al.Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle[J].J Anim Sci, 1963, 22(2):486-494.
[24]	LIU R R, XING S Y, WANG J, et al.A new chicken 55K SNP genotyping array[J].BMC Genomics, 2019, 20(1):410.
[25]	BROWNING B L, ZHOU Y, BROWNING S R.A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels[J].Am J Hum Genet, 2018, 103(3):338-348.
[26]	VANRADEN P M.Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions[J].J Dairy Sci, 2008, 91(11):4414-4423.
[27]	李森, 杜永旺, 文杰, 等.快速型黄羽肉鸡饲料利用效率性状的基因组选择研究[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(8):2151-2161.LI S, DU Y W, WEN J, et al.A study of genomic selection for feed efficiency traits in fast-growing yellow-feathered broilers[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(8):2151-2161.(in Chinese)
[28]	LI W, ZHENG M Q, ZHAO G P, et al.Identification of QTL regions and candidate genes for growth and feed efficiency in broilers[J].Genet Sel Evol, 2021, 53(1):13.
[29]	刘天飞, 罗成龙, 王艳, 等.基于简化基因组测序技术和基因芯片技术比较研究黄羽肉鸡基因组选择[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(10):2378-2386.LIU T F, LUO C L, WANG Y, et al.Comparison between reduced-representation genome sequencing and SNP chip for genomic selection in yellow-feathered broiler[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(10):2378-2386.(in Chinese)
[30]	XU Z Q, JI C L, ZHANG Y, et al.Combination analysis of genome-wide association and transcriptome sequencing of residual feed intake in quality chickens[J].BMC Genomics, 2016, 17:594.
[31]	YI Z H, LI X, LUO W, et al.Feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and cholecystokinin type A receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with feed intake and average daily gain in a Chinese local chicken population[J].J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 2018, 9:50.
[32]	李森.不同评估方法比较金陵黄鸡饲料利用效率性状的GS选择进展[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2021.LI S.Assessment of GS genetic gain of feed utilization efficiency in Jinling yellow-feathered broilers by different methods[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.(in Chinese)
[33]	EDWARDS S M, SØRENSEN I F, SARUP P, et al.Genomic prediction for quantitative traits is improved by mapping variants to gene ontology categories in drosophila melanogaster[J].Genetics, 2016, 203(4):1871-1883.
[34]	MACLEOD I M, BOWMAN P J, JAGT C J V, et al.Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits[J].BMC Genomics, 2016, 17:144.
[35]	ZHANG Z, LIU J F, DING X D, et al.Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix[J].PLoS One, 2010, 5(9):e12648.
[36]	ZHANG Z, ERBE M, HE J L, et al.Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix[J].G3 (Bethesda), 2015, 5(4):615-627.
[37]	ROMÉ H, CHU T T, MAROIS D, et al.Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers[J].J Anim Breed Genet, 2021, 138(5):528-540.
[38]	GAO N, TENG J Y, YE S P, et al.Genomic prediction of complex phenotypes using genic similarity based relatedness matrix[J].Front Genet, 2018, 9:364.
[39]	袁泽湖.整合GWAS和eQTL先验的绵羊部分肉用性状全基因组选择研究[D].兰州:兰州大学, 2020.YUAN Z H.The prior information from GWAS and EQTL increase the accuracy of genomic selection in several sheep meat traits[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2020.(in Chinese)
[40]	SCHRAG T A, WESTHUES M, SCHIPPRACK W, et al.Beyond genomic prediction:Combining different types of omics data can improve prediction of hybrid performance in maize[J].Genetics, 2018, 208(4):1373-1385.
[41]	YIN L L, ZHANG H H, ZHOU X, et al.KAML:improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits using machine learning determined parameters[J].Genome Biol, 2020, 21(1):146.
[42]	袁泽湖, 葛玲, 李发弟, 等.整合生物学先验信息的全基因组选择方法及其在家畜育种中的应用进展[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(12):3323-3334.YUAN Z H, GE L, LI F D, et al.The method of genomic selection by integrating biological prior information and its application in livestock breeding[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(12):3323-3334.(in Chinese)
[43]	高宁.整合生物学先验信息的基因组选择方法研究[D].广州:华南农业大学, 2018.GAO N.Study on the methodology of genomic prediction by integrating biological knowledge[D].Guangzhou:South China Agricultural University, 2018.(in Chinese)

Genomic Selection for RFI in Broiler Combining GWAS Prior Marker Information

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 43

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHONG Xin, ZHANG Hui, ZHANG Chong, LIU Xiaohong. Research Progress on Genetic Breeding of Reproductive Performance in Sows [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(2): 438-450.
[2]	WANG Wannian, CHEN Sijia, GAO Jinrong, WEN Zhonghao, YUAN Mengjiao, ZHANG Hongzhi, PANG Zhixu, QIAO Liying, LIU Wenzhong. Simulation Study on Genomic Selection of Sex-limited Traits Using Multilayer Perceptron in Sheep [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(7): 2824-2835.
[3]	ZHANG Xiaoke, LIAO Weili, CHEN Xinyou, LI Tingting, YUAN Xiaolong, LI Jiaqi, HUANG Xiang, ZHANG Hao. Genome-wide Association Study for Identifying Candidate Genes of Growth Traits in Duroc Pigs [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(5): 1868-1876.
[4]	WU Jun, CAI Xiaodian, LIN Qing, ZHONG Zhanming, YE Haoqiang, WEI Chen, XU Zhiting, WU Xibo, SI Jinglei, ZHANG Zhe, LI Jiaqi. Weighted Single-step GWAS of Eye Muscle Area, Predicted Lean Meat Percentage and Average Backfat Thickness in A Yorkshire Pig Population [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(4): 1403-1414.
[5]	ZHANG Gaomeng, DING Jiqiang, LIU Yuhong, ZHENG Maiqing, WEN Jie, ZHAO Guiping, LI Qinghe. Genome-wide Association Study Reveals the Genetic Basis of Hatching Traits in White-feathered Broilers [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(2): 534-544.
[6]	YANG Kai, LU Zhuoda, HE Jian, ZHANG Ruiqi, WANG Suqing, LI Kebiao, ZHAO Yunxiang, ZHU Xiaoping, GUO Jinbiao. The Population Effect of Commercial Pigs on the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Carcass Traits in Duroc Pigs [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(12): 4943-4951.
[7]	FAN Chenyu, SHAN Yanju, ZHANG Ming, JI Gaige, JU Xiaojun, TU Yunjie, HE Xi, SHU Jingting, LIU Yifan, ZHANG Haihan. Genome-wide Association Study of Body Weight and Meat Quality Traits in Lihua Mahuang Chickens [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(12): 4982-4992.
[8]	SUN Dongxiao, ZHANG Shengli, ZHANG Qin, LI Jiao, ZHANG Guixiang, LIU Chousheng, ZHENG Weijie. Application Progress on Genomic Selection Technology for Dairy Cattle in China [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(10): 4028-4039.
[9]	MA Haoran, ZHANG Lupei, JIN Shengyun, BAO Jinshan, LI Hongyan, GAO Huijiang, XU Lingyang, WANG Zezhao, LI Junya. Assessment of the Genomic Relationships for Chinese Indigenous Beef Cattle Using High-density SNP Chip [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(10): 4174-4185.
[10]	ZHANG Changzheng, LI Desen, HUANG Min, FANG Xiaomin, ZHAO Weimin, REN Shouwen, DONG Huansheng, REN Jun, ZHOU Lisheng. An Imputed Whole-genome Sequence-based GWAS Approach Pinpoints Genetic Loci for Body Conformation at Birth and Teat Number Traits in Sushan Pig Population [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(1): 88-102.
[11]	WU Pingxian, CHEN Li, LONG Xi, CHAI Jie, ZHANG Tinghuan, XU Shunlai, GUO Zongyi, WANG Jinyong. Genome-wide Association Studies for Reproductive Traits at First Farrowing in Rongchang Pigs [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(1): 103-112.
[12]	SHI Rui, SU Guosheng, CHEN Ziwei, LI Xiang, LUO Hanpeng, LIU Lin, GUO Gang, ZHANG Yi, WANG Yachun, ZHANG Shengli, ZHANG Qin. Comparisons of Genomic Predictions for Fertility Traits in Chinese Holstein Cattle [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(9): 2944-2954.
[13]	PANG Zhixu, ZHANG Hongzhi, QIAO Liying, WANG Wannian, PAN Yangyang, LIU Wenzhong. Simulation Study on Joint Genomic Breeding Using Metafounders [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(7): 2172-2181.
[14]	DING Jiqiang, LI Qinghe, ZHANG Gaomeng, LI Sen, ZHENG Maiqing, WEN Jie, ZHAO Guiping. Comparing the Accuracy of Estimated Breeding Value by Several Algorithms on Laying Traits in Broilers [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(5): 1364-1372.
[15]	ZHANG Pengfei, HE Jun, WANG Lixian, ZHAO Fuping. Simulation Study on the Effects of Different Mating Schemes Based on Genomic and Pedigree Information [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(10): 3448-3458.