Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1582-1593.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2021.06.013

• ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND REPRODUCTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Prostaglandin D2 and F on the Corpus Luteum Regression in Sheep

YANG Heng1*, SHAO Yanyan2, ZHAO Zongsheng2*, ZHU Mengting2,3, NAN Ying2, WANG Mingyuan2, FANG Chenhui2, WU Pei2, XIE Mengting2, JIANG Baihui2   

  1. 1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Breeding, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi 832000, China
  • Received:2021-03-26 Online:2021-06-23 Published:2021-06-22

Abstract: The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of prostaglandins (PGs) D2 and F on the corpus luteum tissue morphology, reproductive hormones and the expression of key genes and receptors in female sheep. Meanwhile, the interrelationship and mechanism of the above factors in the degradation of the corpus luteum are analyzed, which can provide a new theoretical basis for ensuring the continuous breeding of female animals. Sixteen Kazakh sheep were randomly divided into 4 groups, and were injected intramuscularly in uterus with PGD2, PGF, PGD2+PGF and normal saline (control group) during the luteal phase of the estrus cycle, respectively. HE staining combined with physical photographs were used to compare the morphological changes of the corpus luteum before and after the treatment. ELISA method was used to detect the changes in the concentration of P4, E2, PGD2 and PGFin the peripheral serum; qRT-PCR and Western blot were used to detect the key synthase genes HPGDS, PGFS and their receptors (DP1, CRTH2, FP) mRNA and protein expression levels. Results showed that, compared with the control group, the corpus luteum degeneration effect was the most obvious in the PGD2+PGF group, followed by the PGF group and PGD2 group. ELISA results showed that with the passage of time after treatment, P4 concentration in different experimental treatment groups showed a significant downward trend (P<0.05), and the change trend was the most significant in the PGD2+PGF group (P<0.05). However, the concentrations of E2, PGD2 and PGF showed different differences in different groups. Among them, the PGD2 and PGF concentrations in the PGD2+PGF group were significantly decreased (P<0.05); the E2 concentration was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the PGD2 concentration was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in the PGF group; the E2 concentration was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the PGD2 concentration was significantly increased (P<0.05) in the PGD2 group. Results of qRT-PCR and Western blot showed that, compared with the control group, HPGDS mRNA and protein expression were significantly down-regulated (P<0.05), but PGFS, CRTH2 and FP mRNA and protein expression were significantly up-regulated (P<0.05) in PGD2+PGF group; In the PGFgroup, HPGDS mRNA and protein expression were significantly down-regulated (P<0.05), and the mRNA and protein expression levels of other genes were significantly up-regulated (P<0.05); In the PGD2 group, the expressions of HPGDS, DP1, PGFS and FP mRNA and protein were significantly up-regulated (P<0.05). Meanwhile, in the detection of gene expression of different receptors, it was found that the expression of DP1 receptor was significantly higher than that of the CRTH2 receptor in the PGD2 group (P<0.05), while the expression of CRTH2 was significantly higher than that of DP1 in the PGF group (P<0.05). In summary, the above results showed that whether PGD2 was used alone or in combination with PGF, it could promote the degradation of CL, especially when the two were combined, which had an obvious synergistic effect to promote dissolution of CL. This mechanism may be related to the hormones level, the expression of key synthetases and receptor types in vivo, which lays a foundation for a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory mechanism of CL degradation in mammals, and provides a new idea for further optimization of efficient reproductive technology (especially PGs scheme).

Key words: sheep, corpus luteum regression, PGD2, PGF

CLC Number: