基于1.5 T磁共振成像系统观察湖羊颅脑形态解剖结构

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2020.01.019

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 170-178.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2020.01.019

基于1.5 T磁共振成像系统观察湖羊颅脑形态解剖结构

姜敏¹, 姚大伟¹, 邓威¹, 李晓坤², 李丽婷², 张伟东², 杨德吉^1*

1. 南京农业大学动物医学院, 南京 210095;
2. 艾贝尔宠物医院, 南京 210036

收稿日期:2019-06-13 出版日期:2020-01-23 发布日期:2020-01-17
通讯作者: 杨德吉,主要从事兽医影像诊断学研究,E-mail:djyang@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:姜敏(1994-),女,硕士生,主要从事动物MRI、CT影像诊断技术研究,E-mail:2017107110@njau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2017YFD05022000）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（KYYJ201809；KYZ201731）

Preliminary Observation of the Anatomical Structure of the Brain in Hu-sheep by 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

JIANG Min¹, YAO Dawei¹, DENG Wei¹, LI Xiaokun², LI Liting², ZHANG Weidong², YANG Deji^1*

1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
2. Ai-Bi Pet Hospital, Nanjing 210036, China

Received:2019-06-13 Online:2020-01-23 Published:2020-01-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过磁共振（magnetic resonance imaging，MRI）影像技术探讨湖羊颅脑影像解剖结构。使用1.5 T磁共振扫描仪对10只健康湖羊进行扫查，采用自旋回波（SE）序列，快速自旋回波（FSE）序列以及液体衰减反转恢复（FLAIR）3种序列对湖羊脑部矢状面、横断面及冠状面进行成像。对获得的影像进行详细的解剖结构注释，并且测量了湖羊间脑、颅脑、端脑、第三脑室、第四脑室高度及下垂体的长度、宽度和高度。得到了一套完整的湖羊颅脑磁共振影像解剖图谱及正常湖羊脑解剖结构测量数据。本研究结果可为湖羊及其他绵羊颅脑疾病的影像学诊断提供依据，同时也为医学实验动物模型的研究提供了有价值的参考。

关键词: 湖羊, 颅脑, MRI, 解剖

Abstract: This experiment was aimed to use the magnetic resonance imaging to study the anatomical structure of Hu-sheep's brain. Ten healthy Hu-sheep were scanned by a 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner. Sagittal, transverse and dorsal aspect images of the brain were archived by using three sequences which are spin echo (SE), fast spin echo (FSE), and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). All anatomical structure of MR images were noted, the height of diencephalon, cerebrum, telencephalon, the third ventricle, the fourth ventricle were measured,the same as the pituitary gland's height, length and width. As a result, we have established a complete image atlas and provided basic imaging data of the normal Hu-sheep's brain structure. It can provide helpful informations for imaging diagnosis of Hu-sheep's and the other sheep's brain disease, as well as provide a valuable reference for medical experimental animal model.

Key words: Hu-sheep, brain, MRI, anatomy

中图分类号:

姜敏, 姚大伟, 邓威, 李晓坤, 李丽婷, 张伟东, 杨德吉. 基于1.5 T磁共振成像系统观察湖羊颅脑形态解剖结构[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(1): 170-178.

JIANG Min, YAO Dawei, DENG Wei, LI Xiaokun, LI Liting, ZHANG Weidong, YANG Deji. Preliminary Observation of the Anatomical Structure of the Brain in Hu-sheep by 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(1): 170-178.

参考文献 20

[1]	POORE K R, BOULLIN J P, CLEAL J K, et al. Sex-and age-specific effects of nutrition in early gestation and early postnatal life on hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathoadrenal function in adult sheep[J]. J Physiol, 2010, 588(12):2219-2237.
[2]	LÉVY F, KELLER M. Neurobiology of maternal behavior in sheep[J]. Adv Study Behav, 2008, 38:399-437.
[3]	LÉVY F, KELLER M. Olfactory mediation of maternal behavior in selected mammalian species[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2009, 200(2):336-345.
[4]	STYPULKOWSKI P H, GIFTAKIS J E, BILLSTROM T M, et al. Development of a large animal model for investigation of deep brain stimulation for epilepsy[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2011, 89(2):111-122.
[5]	GRIMMELT A C, EITZEN S, BALAKHADZE I, et al. Closed traumatic brain injury model in sheep mimicking high-velocity, closed head trauma in humans[J]. Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2011, 72(3):120-126.
[6]	BOLTZE J, FÖRSCHLER A, NITZSCHE B, et al. Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in sheep:a novel large animal model of focal cerebral ischemia[J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2008, 28(12):1951-1964.
[7]	PERENTOS N, MARTINS A Q, WATSON T C, et al. Translational neurophysiology in sheep:measuring sleep and neurological dysfunction in CLN5 Batten disease affected sheep[J]. Brain, 2015, 138(4):862-874.
[8]	LÉTOURNEAU P, PRAUD J P. A radiotelemetry system for polysomnographic recordings in lambs[J]. Methods, 2003, 30(2):115-121.
[9]	OPDAM H I, FEDERICO P, JACKSON G D, et al. A sheep model for the study of focal epilepsy with concurrent intracranial EEG and functional MRI[J]. Epilepsia, 2002, 43(8):779-787.
[10]	SCHENK H C, GANTER M, SEEHUSEN F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in metabolic and toxic disorders of 3 small ruminants[J]. J Vet Intern Med, 2007, 21(4):864-871.
[11]	SCHMIDT M J, LANGEN N, KLUMPP S, et al. A study of the comparative anatomy of the brain of domestic ruminants using magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Vet J, 2012, 191(1):85-93.
[12]	LEE W, LEE S D, PARK M Y, et al. Functional and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the sheep brain[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2015, 11:262.
[13]	ELLA A, DELGADILLO J A, CHEMINEAU P, et al. Computation of a high-resolution MRI 3D stereotaxic atlas of the sheep brain[J]. J Comp Neurol, 2017, 525(3):676-692.
[14]	MÜLLHAUPT D, AUGSBURGER H, SCHWARZ A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the rabbit brain at 3 T[J]. Acta Vet Scand, 2015, 57(1):47.
[15]	潘永明, 金平,徐剑钦,等. 基于3. 0T磁共振成像系统初步观察WHBE兔脑部形态解剖结构[J]. 中国实验动物学报, 2017, 25(4):356-361.PAN Y M, JIN P, XU J Q, et al. Preliminary observation of the anatomical structures of the brain in WHBE Rabbits by 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging system[J]. Acta Laboratorium Animalis Scientia Sinica, 2017, 25(4):356-361. (in Chinese)
[16]	林嘉. 湖羊特异的行为习性及其利用[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2012(S1):419-422.LIN J. Hu-sheep specific behavioral habits and their utilization[J]. China Herbivore Science, 2012(S1):419-422. (in Chinese)
[17]	CHALIVOIX S, GUILLAUME D, COGNIÉ J, et al. Photoperiodic variations of the polysialylated form of neural cell adhesion molecule within the hypothalamus and related reproductive output in the ewe[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2013, 352(2):387-399.
[18]	BATAILLER M, DROGUERRE M, BARONCINI M, et al. DCX-expressing cells in the vicinity of the hypothalamic neurogenic niche:a comparative study between mouse, sheep, and human tissues[J]. J Comp Neurol, 2014, 522(8):1966-1985.
[19]	BATAILLER M, DEROUET L, BUTRUILLE L, et al. Sensitivity to the photoperiod and potential migratory features of neuroblasts in the adult sheep hypothalamus[J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2016, 221(6):3301-3314.
[20]	THOMAS W B. Evaluation of veterinary patients with brain disease[J]. Vet Clin North Am:Small Anim Pract, 2010, 40(1):1-19.

基于1.5 T磁共振成像系统观察湖羊颅脑形态解剖结构

Preliminary Observation of the Anatomical Structure of the Brain in Hu-sheep by 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘林丽, 彭雪兰, 李博, 程乐凡, 次仁拉姆, 张恩平. 过表达UCP3基因对萨湖羊前体脂肪细胞分化的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3275-3285.
[2]	熊程坤, 张道亮, 杨悦, 丁红研, 赵杰, 李玉, 王希春, 冯士彬, 赵畅, 汤继顺, 吴金节. 芦丁对围产期湖羊瘤胃发酵、瘤胃菌群结构及抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2898-2909.
[3]	叶倩文, 陈卓, 李鑫, 孙亚伟, 金肖叶, 李紫仟, 吾买尔江·牙合甫, 钟旗, 马雪连, 姚刚. 一月龄吮乳羔羊肠道菌群组成及其预测物质代谢功能的动态变化研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(3): 1095-1108.
[4]	孙美杰, 曹力文, 郑文金, 申军士, 朱伟云. 基于转录组学研究日粮添加尿素对育肥湖羊肝组织氨代谢的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(3): 1148-1159.
[5]	王雅涵, 郑宇婧, 钟沛, 李晓丹, 王锋. YAP1在发情期不同繁殖力湖羊子宫内膜中的表达模式及功能分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(1): 189-200.
[6]	韦肖, 张建童, 龙唐晖, 李开嵘, 李艳娇, 欧阳克蕙, 邱清华. 日粮能量水平对湖羊瘤胃发酵特性和微生物组成的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(9): 3042-3051.
[7]	李宇, 段春辉, 宋志攀, 岳思聪, 王媛, 张英杰, 刘月琴. 黄体期注射PGF2α对母羊血清生殖激素及相关细胞因子的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(6): 1807-1818.
[8]	邓威, 姚大伟, 张壮志, 康强, 韩涛, 喻昌盛, 郭庆勇, 周程远, 杨德吉. 羊脑包虫病CT、MRI影像特征[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(6): 1727-1733.
[9]	杨花, 赵欣月, 万珍, 王锋, 张艳丽. HSD17B12基因对湖羊垂体细胞促性腺激素合成的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(3): 703-713.
[10]	郭潇潇, 李隐侠, 王悦, 张含, 张俊, 钱勇, 孟春花, 王慧利, 仲跻峰, 曹少先. 湖羊PLAG1基因5'调控区多态性及其与早期体重的关联分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(2): 331-343.
[11]	吕松洁, 付丽, 范文华, 张树山, 吴彩凤, 徐皆欢, 戴建军, 张德福. 线粒体靶向抗氧化剂Mitoquinone对湖羊冻精损伤的保护作用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(12): 2554-2559.
[12]	赵国宏, 王世琴, 王芬, 王宏, 刁其玉, 韩向敏, 张乃锋. 湖羊育肥期饲粮添加酵母培养物对营养物质表观消化率及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(10): 2156-2165.
[13]	姚晓磊, 黄欣爱, 肖慎华, 郑临枫, 范丽洁, 金宇月, 刘孜斐, 张艳丽, 王洁, 王锋. 不同发育阶段湖羊生殖器官脂联素受体与睾酮分泌关键基因表达模式及相关性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(8): 1642-1650.
[14]	樊懿萱, 邓凯平, 澹台文静, 黄欣爱, 王锋, 陈明. 多不饱和脂肪酸日粮中添加酵母硒对湖羊脂肪酸组成和抗氧化的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(8): 1661-1673.
[15]	聂海涛, 黄欣爱, 刘浩, 郭艺璇, 王子玉, 张艳丽, 万永杰, 樊懿萱, 张国敏, 王锋, 王洁. 黄体期不同营养水平对湖羊卵泡发育及相关葡萄糖代谢途径的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(5): 942-953.