大型基因组亲缘矩阵求逆算法的优化研究

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2020.08.004

Abstract

Abstract: Both GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods involved in the inversion of genomic relationship matrices in genomic selection, and large-scale matrix inversion operations were time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to improve the efficiency of the inverse operation of large genomic relationship matrix. The genomic relationship matrix from real data and simulated data was constructed, and the Intel MKL matrix function was introduced, and the efficiency of matrix inversion was improved by reducing the number of iterations (method 1) and repeating the block (method 2), programming to implement algorithms and test computing time on desktop computers and servers. The results showed that the acceleration ratio of the direct inversion function with the MKL was 0.898 when calculating the genomic relationship matrix of 4 000×4 000 using method 1. The calculation speed of 16 000×16 000 was 1.006 times more than that of the inversion function in MKL; The calculation speed of method 2 in the 4 000×4 000 genomic relationship matrix was 1.084 times more than that of the MKL inversion function; For larger 128 000×128 000 matrix inversion operations, the acceleration ratio of this method was 1.805 times more than that of the inversion function in MKL. Compared with MKL direct inversion function, the improved two methods have higher efficiency.

Key words: genomic selection, matrix inversion, block iterative inverse

CLC Number:

S828.2

ZHOU Jie, ZENG Weijun, YANG Tianrui, CHENG Yufei, LONG Xianda, JING Peiqi, ZENG Yangshuang, XU Xu, TANG Guoqing. Optimization Study of Inverse Algorithm of Large Genomic Relationship Matrix[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(8): 1804-1810.

References 36

[1]	张闻,何永蜀,陈元晓.新一代DNA测序技术[J].国际遗传学杂志,2009,32(5):341-344.ZHANG W,HE Y S,CHEN Y X.New-generation DNA sequencing technology[J].International Journal of Genetics, 2009,32(5):341-344.(in Chinese)
[2]	王晨,秦珂,薛明,等.全基因组选择在猪育种中的应用[J].畜牧兽医学报,2016,47(1):1-9.WANG C,QIN K,XUE M,et al.Application of genomic selection in swine breeding[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016,47(1):1-9.(in Chinese)
[3]	赵晓铎,张鹏,吕昕哲,等.全基因组选择技术在牧场的应用[J].中国奶牛,2019(7):21-24.ZHAO X D,ZHANG P,LV X Z,et al.New-generation dna sequencing technology[J].China Dairy Cattle, 2019(7):21-24.(in Chinese)
[4]	MEUWISSEN T H,HAYES B J,GODDARD M E.Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps[J].Genetics,2001,157(4):1819-1829.
[5]	WIGGANS G R,COLE J B,HUBBARD S M,et al.Genomic selection in dairy cattle:the USDA experience[J]. Annu Rev Anim Biosci,2017,5:309-327.
[6]	ELSEN J M.Genomic selection-the final step or another step in an endless race?[J].J Anim Breed Genet, 2018, 135(2):95-96.
[7]	李宏伟,王瑞军,王志英,等.家畜基因组选择研究进展[J].遗传,2017,39(5):377-387.LI H W,WANG R J,WANG Z Y,et al.The research progress of genomic selection in livestock[J].Hereditas (Beijing), 2017,39(5):377-387.(in Chinese)
[8]	MISZTAL I,LEGARRA A.Invited review:efficient computation strategies in genomic selection[J].Animal, 2017, 11(5):731-736.
[9]	WELLER J I,EZRA E,RON M.Invited review:a perspective on the future of genomic selection in dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci,2017,100(11):8633-8644.
[10]	FRAGOMENI B D,LOURENCO D,TSURUTA S,et al.0352 Genetics of heat stress in purebred and crossbred pigs from different states using BLUP or ssGBLUP[J].J Anim Sci,2016,94(5):169-170.
[11]	KOIVULA M,STRANDÉN I,PÖSÖ J,et al.Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data[J].J Dairy Sci,2015,98(4):2775-2784.
[12]	KOIVULA M,STRANDÉN I,AAMAND G P,et al.Comparison of ssGBLUP and ssGTBLUP using Nordic Holstein TD data[C]//Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.2018.
[13]	HOWARD J T,RATHJE T A,BRUNS C E,et al.The impact of truncating data on the predictive ability of selection candidate EBV in swine using ssgblup[J].J Anim Sci,2018,96(S2):18-19.
[14]	SOLLERO B P,HOWARD J T,SPANGLER M L.The impact of reducing the frequency of animals geno-typed at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP[J].J Anim Sci,2019,97(7):2780-2792.
[15]	BALOCHE G,LEGARRA A,SALLÉ G,et al.Assessment of accuracy of genomic prediction for French Lacaune dairy sheep[J]. J Dairy Sci,2014,97(2):1107-1116.
[16]	MASUDA Y,MISZTAL I,TSURUTA S,et al.Single-step genomic evaluations with 570K genotyped animals in US Holsteins[J].Interbull Bulletin,2015(49):85-89.
[17]	潘荣杨,张哲,高宁,等.基因组选择一步法理论及应用研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2016,43(9):124-131.PAN R Y,ZHANG Z,GAO N,et al.Research progress in Single step procedure theory and application in genomic selection[J].Guangdong Agricultural Sciences,2016,43(9):124-131.(in Chinese)
[18]	MISZTAL I,LEGARRA A,AGUILAR I.Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information[J].J Dairy Sci,2009,92(9):4648-4655.
[19]	LEGARRA A,AGUILAR I,MISZTAL I.A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information[J]. J Dairy Sci,2009,92(9):4656-4663.
[20]	ZHANG X Y,LOURENCO D,AGUILAR I,et al.Weighting strategies for single-step genomic BLUP:an iterative approach for accurate calculation of GEBV and GWAS[J].Front Genet,2016,7:151.
[21]	彭潇,尹立林,梅全顺,等.猪主要经济性状的基因组选择研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2019,50(2):439-445.PENG X,YIN L L,MEI Q S,et al.A study of genome selection based on the porcine major economic traits[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2019,50(2):439-445.(in Chinese)
[22]	KINCAID D R,RESPESS J R,YOUNG D M.Itpack 2C:a FORTRAN package for solving large sparse linear systems by adaptative accelerated iterative methods[R].Austin:University of Texas,1997.
[23]	MADSEN P,JENSEN J,LABOURIAU R,et al.DMU-a package for analyzing multivariate mixed models in quantitative genetics and genomics[C]//Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.2014:18-22.
[24]	周学勇.计算机在养猪生产管理和育种中的应用[J].现代农业科技,2011(12):34-35.ZHOU X Y. Application of computer in pig production management and breeding[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(12):34-35. (in Chinese)
[25]	AGUILAR I,MISZTAL I,LEGARRA A,et al.Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation[J].J Anim Breed Genet,2011,128(6):422-428.
[26]	FORNI S,AGUILAR I,MISZTAL I.Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information[J].Genet Sel Evol,2011,43(1):1.
[27]	MISZTAL I,TSURUTA S,AGUILAR I,et al.Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation[J]. J Dairy Sci,2013,96(1):647-654.
[28]	MEYER K,TIER B,GRASER H U.Technical note:updating the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix[J].J Anim Sci, 2013,91(6):2583-2586.
[29]	MISZTAL I.Inexpensive computation of the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix in populations with small effective population size[J].Genetics,2016,202(2):401-409.
[30]	FRAGOMENI B O,LOURENCO D A L,TSURUTA S,et al.Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses-a simulation study[J].J Anim Breed Genet, 2015,132(5):340-345.
[31]	FAUX P,GENGLER N,MISZTAL I.A recursive algorithm for decomposition and creation of the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix[J].J Dairy Sci,2012,95(10):6093-6102.
[32]	毛汉清.可逆矩阵的分块求逆方法研究[J].上海铁道学院学报,1994,15(3):110-117.MAO H Q.Research of methods to obtain an inverse matrix by partitioning an inversible matrix[J].Journal of Shanghai Institute of Railway Technology,1994,15(3):110-117.(in Chinese)
[33]	张国亮,沈慧,石峰,等.大型实对称矩阵分块迭代求逆算法[J].无线互联科技,2015(6):127-129.ZHANG G L,SHEN H,SHI F,et al.Block iterative inverse algorithm for a iarge-scale real matrix[J].Wireless Internet Technology,2015(6):127-129.(in Chinese)
[34]	VANRADEN P M.Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions[J].J Dairy Sci,2008,91(11):4414-4423.
[35]	AGUILAR I,MISZTAL I,JOHNSON D L,et al.Hot topic:a unified approach to utilize phenotypic,full pedigree,and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score[J].J Dairy Sci,2010,93(2):743-752.
[36]	SARGOLZAEI M,SCHENKEL F S.QMSim:a large-scale genome simulator for livestock[J].Bioinformatics, 2009,25(5):680-681.

Optimization Study of Inverse Algorithm of Large Genomic Relationship Matrix

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Wannian, CHEN Sijia, GAO Jinrong, WEN Zhonghao, YUAN Mengjiao, ZHANG Hongzhi, PANG Zhixu, QIAO Liying, LIU Wenzhong. Simulation Study on Genomic Selection of Sex-limited Traits Using Multilayer Perceptron in Sheep [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(7): 2824-2835.
[2]	YANG Kai, LU Zhuoda, HE Jian, ZHANG Ruiqi, WANG Suqing, LI Kebiao, ZHAO Yunxiang, ZHU Xiaoping, GUO Jinbiao. The Population Effect of Commercial Pigs on the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Carcass Traits in Duroc Pigs [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(12): 4943-4951.
[3]	SUN Dongxiao, ZHANG Shengli, ZHANG Qin, LI Jiao, ZHANG Guixiang, LIU Chousheng, ZHENG Weijie. Application Progress on Genomic Selection Technology for Dairy Cattle in China [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(10): 4028-4039.
[4]	MA Haoran, ZHANG Lupei, JIN Shengyun, BAO Jinshan, LI Hongyan, GAO Huijiang, XU Lingyang, WANG Zezhao, LI Junya. Assessment of the Genomic Relationships for Chinese Indigenous Beef Cattle Using High-density SNP Chip [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(10): 4174-4185.
[5]	SHI Rui, SU Guosheng, CHEN Ziwei, LI Xiang, LUO Hanpeng, LIU Lin, GUO Gang, ZHANG Yi, WANG Yachun, ZHANG Shengli, ZHANG Qin. Comparisons of Genomic Predictions for Fertility Traits in Chinese Holstein Cattle [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(9): 2944-2954.
[6]	PANG Zhixu, ZHANG Hongzhi, QIAO Liying, WANG Wannian, PAN Yangyang, LIU Wenzhong. Simulation Study on Joint Genomic Breeding Using Metafounders [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(7): 2172-2181.
[7]	DING Jiqiang, LI Qinghe, ZHANG Gaomeng, LI Sen, ZHENG Maiqing, WEN Jie, ZHAO Guiping. Comparing the Accuracy of Estimated Breeding Value by Several Algorithms on Laying Traits in Broilers [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(5): 1364-1372.
[8]	DU Yongwang, HUANG Chao, WANG Yidong, LI Sen, WEN Jie, CHEN Zhiwu, ZHAO Guiping, ZHENG Maiqing. Genomic Selection for RFI in Broiler Combining GWAS Prior Marker Information [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(10): 3403-3411.
[9]	ZHANG Pengfei, HE Jun, WANG Lixian, ZHAO Fuping. Simulation Study on the Effects of Different Mating Schemes Based on Genomic and Pedigree Information [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(10): 3448-3458.
[10]	LI Sen, DU Yongwang, WEN Jie, HUANG Chao, CHEN Zhiwu, ZHAO Guiping, ZHENG Maiqing. A Study of Genomic Selection for Feed Efficiency Traits in Fast-growing Yellow-feathered Broilers [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(8): 2151-2161.
[11]	SU Dingran, PENG Peng, YAN Qingxia, CHEN Shaohu, ZHANG Shengli, LI Jiao, LIU Chousheng, SUN Dongxiao. Analysis of the Effects for Genomic Selection in Holstein Young Bulls in China [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(6): 1550-1562.
[12]	ZHU Bo, LI Hongwei, ZHOU Peinuo, LI Qian, GAO Han, WANG Zezhao, WANG Congyong, CAI Wentao, XU Lingyang, CHEN Yan, ZHANG Lupei, GAO Xue, GAO Huijiang, LI Junya. Overview of Genetic Evaluation System of Beef Cattle in China and Abroad [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(6): 1447-1460.
[13]	YUAN Zehu, GE Ling, LI Fadi, YUE Xiangpeng, SUN Wei. The Method of Genomic Selection by Integrating Biological Prior Information and Its Application in Livestock Breeding [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(12): 3323-3334.
[14]	ZHANG Hongzhi, REN Duanyang, AN Lixia, QIAO Liying, LIU Wenzhong. A Novel Genomic Relationship Matrix Applied to Single Birth Animals for Across-breeds Genomic Selection [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(11): 3108-3117.
[15]	DONG Linsong, TAN Cheng, CAI Gengyuan, WU Zhenfang. Comparative Analysis of Different Implementation Strategies on Genomic Selection in Large White Pigs [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(9): 2089-2097.