牛胚胎早期流产研究进展

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2025.10.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

牛胚胎早期流产作为养牛业中的一项重大挑战，近年来吸引了广泛的研究关注并取得了显著进展。研究揭示，遗传因素、环境因素(诸如热应激、营养失衡)、管理疏忽以及感染性病原体等均为导致牛胚胎早期流产的因素。为应对这一难题，科研人员提出了优化营养供给、减轻环境压力、强化疾病防控等综合防治策略。同时，现代生物技术的革新也为深入探究牛胚胎早期流产的复杂机制开辟了新途径。未来，该领域的研究将致力于进一步揭示流产机制，提升防治技术的精准性和有效性，从而为养牛业的可持续发展提供坚实保障。

关键词: 牛, 胚胎, 早期流产

Abstract:

Early embryonic loss in cattle, as a major challenge in the cattle industry, has attracted extensive research attention in recent years and achieved significant progress. Studies have revealed that genetic factors, environmental factors (such as heat stress and nutritional imbalance), management negligence, and infectious pathogens are all factors contributing to early embryonic loss in cattle. To address this issue, researchers have proposed comprehensive prevention and control strategies including optimizing nutritional supply, reducing environmental stress, and strengthening disease prevention and control. Meanwhile, the innovation of modern biotechnology has opened up new avenues for in-depth exploration of the complex mechanisms of early embryonic loss in cattle. In the future, research in this field will focus on further revealing the mechanisms of embryonic loss, improving the precision and effectiveness of prevention and control technologies, and thus providing a solid guarantee for the sustainable development of the cattle industry.

Key words: cattle, embryo, early abortion

中图分类号:

S823.3

王子卓, 张笑梦, 冯肖艺, 宋浩然, 董建华, 崔凯, 赵学明. 牛胚胎早期流产研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(10): 4807-4820.

WANG Zizhuo, ZHANG Xiaomeng, FENG Xiaoyi, SONG Haoran, DONG Jianhua, CUI Kai, ZHAO Xueming. Research Advances in Early Abortion of Cattle Embryos[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2025, 56(10): 4807-4820.

参考文献 146

1	ALBAAJ A , DUROCHER J , LEBLANC S J , et al. Meta-analysis of the incidence of pregnancy losses in dairy cows at different stages to 90 days of gestation[J]. JDS Commun, 2023, 4 (2): 144- 148. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0278
2	MCDOUGALL S , RHODES F M , VERKERK G . Pregnancy loss in dairy cattle in the Waikato region of New Zealand[J]. N Z Vet J, 2005, 53 (5): 279- 287. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2005.36561
3	DISKIN M G , WATERS S M , PARR M H , et al. Pregnancy losses in cattle: potential for improvement[J]. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2016, 28 (1-2): 83- 93.
4	DISKIN M G , SREENAN J M . Fertilization and embryonic mortality rates in beef heifers after artificial insemination[J]. J Reprod Fertil, 1980, 59 (2): 463- 468. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0590463
5	MANN G E , LAMMING G E . Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows[J]. Reproduction, 2001, 121 (1): 175- 180. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210175
6	HANSEN P J . Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2009, 364 (1534): 3341- 3350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0131
7	WILTBANK M C , BAEZ G M , GARCIA-GUERRA A , et al. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows[J]. Theriogenology, 2016, 86 (1): 239- 253. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.037
8	REESE S T , FRANCO G A , POOLE R K , et al. Pregnancy loss in beef cattle: A meta-analysis[J]. Anim Reprod Sci, 2020, 212, 106251. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106251
9	CANTON G J , MORENO F , FIORENTINO M A , et al. Spatial-temporal trends and economic losses associated with bovine abortifacients in central Argentina[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2022, 54 (4): 242. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03237-0
10	WIJMA R , WEIGEL D J , VUKASINOVIC N , et al. Genomic prediction for abortion in lactating Holstein dairy cows[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (16): 2079.
11	PEI J , ZHAO S , YIN M , et al. Differential proteomics of placentas reveals metabolic disturbance and oxidative damage participate yak spontaneous miscarriage during late pregnancy[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2022, 18 (1): 248. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03354-w
12	BAMBER R L , SHOOK G E , WILTBANK M C , et al. Genetic parameters for anovulation and pregnancy loss in dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92 (11): 5739- 5753. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2226
13	CARTHY T R , RYAN D P , FITZGERALD A M , et al. Genetic parameters of ovarian and uterine reproductive traits in dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2015, 98 (6): 4095- 4106. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8924
14	LONERGAN P , RIZOS D , GUTIERREZ-ADAN A , et al. Oocyte and embryo quality: effect of origin, culture conditions and gene expression patterns[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2003, 38 (4): 259- 267. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00437.x
15	TENGHE A M M , BOUWMAN A C , BERGLUND B , et al. Genome-wide association study for endocrine fertility traits using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and sequence variants in dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99 (7): 5470- 5485. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10533
16	SCHETTINI G P , MOROZYUK M , BIASE F H . Identification of novel cattle (Bos taurus) genes and biological insights of their function in pre-implantation embryo development[J]. BMC Genomics, 2024, 25 (1): 775. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10685-5
17	GHANEM M E , NISHIBORI M , ISOBE N , et al. Detection of APAF1 mutation in Holstein cows and mummified foetuses in Japanese dairy herds[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2018, 53 (1): 137- 142. doi: 10.1111/rda.13081
18	COLACO S , SAKKAS D . Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018, 35 (11): 1953- 1968. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1304-4
19	KUMARESAN A , DAS GUPTA M , DATTA T K , et al. Sperm DNA integrity and male fertility in farm animals: A review[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2020, 7, 321. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00321
20	RIVAS J , HASANAJ A , DEBLON C , et al. Genetic diversity of bovine viral diarrhea virus in cattle in France between 2018 and 2020[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2022, 9, 1028866. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1028866
21	FANG L , JIANG J , LI B , et al. Genetic and epigenetic architecture of paternal origin contribute to gestation length in cattle[J]. Commun Biol, 2019, 2, 100. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0341-6
22	LOCKHART K N , FALLON L C , ORTEGA M S . Paternal determinants of early embryo development[J]. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2023, 36 (2): 43- 50. doi: 10.1071/RD23172
23	NICHOLAS F W . Animal breeding and disease[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2005, 360 (1459): 1529- 1536. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1674
24	KHAN M Z , WANG J , MA Y , et al. Genetic polymorphisms in immune- and inflammation-associated genes and their association with bovine mastitis resistance/susceptibility[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14, 1082144. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1082144
25	WARNING J C , MCCRACKEN S A , MORRIS J M . A balancing act: mechanisms by which the fetus avoids rejection by the maternal immune system[J]. Reproduction, 2011, 141 (6): 715- 724. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0360
26	OTT T L . Immunological detection of pregnancy: Evidence for systemic immune modulation during early pregnancy in ruminants[J]. Theriogenology, 2020, 150, 498- 503. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.04.010
27	RUPP R , HERNANDEZ A , MALLARD B A . Association of bovine leukocyte antigen (BoLA) DRB3.2 with immune response, mastitis, and production and type traits in Canadian Holsteins[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90 (2): 1029- 1038. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71589-8
28	SIGDEL A , BISINOTTO R S , PENAGARICANO F . Genes and pathways associated with pregnancy loss in dairy cattle[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11 (1): 13329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92525-0
29	RODRIGUES G R D , BRITO L F , MOTA L F M , et al. Genome-wide association studies and functional annotation of pre-weaning calf mortality and reproductive traits in Nellore cattle from experimental selection lines[J]. BMC Genomics, 2024, 25 (1): 1196. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11113-4
30	MEMILI E , FIRST N L . Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species[J]. Zygote, 2000, 8 (1): 87- 96. doi: 10.1017/S0967199400000861
31	WANG R N , GREEN J , WANG Z , et al. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in development and human diseases[J]. Genes Dis, 2014, 1 (1): 87- 105. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.07.005
32	KRISHNAN M L , VAN STEENWINCKEL J , SCHANG A , et al. Integrative genomics of microglia implicates DLG4 (PSD95) in the white matter development of preterm infants[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8 (1): 428. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00422-w
33	KEE Y , BRONNER-FRASER M . To proliferate or to die: role of Id3 in cell cycle progression and survival of neural crest progenitors[J]. Genes Dev, 2005, 19 (6): 744- 755. doi: 10.1101/gad.1257405
34	HUMBLOT P , LE BOURHIS D , FRITZ S , et al. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle[J]. Vet Med Int, 2010, 2010, 192787.
35	GUTIERREZ-REINOSO M A , APONTE P M , GARCIA-HERREROS M . Genomic analysis, progress and future perspectives in dairy cattle selection: A review[J]. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11 (3): 599.
36	MENEZO Y J R . Paternal and maternal factors in preimplantation embryogenesis: interaction with the biochemical environment[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2006, 12 (5): 616- 621. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61188-1
37	BATOOL I , KAUSAR R , HUSSAIN T . Heat stress-induced dysregulation of bovine reproduction: A focus on corpus luteum and progesterone perspectives[J]. J Therm Biol, 2025, 131, 104201. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104201
38	SIRARD M . How the environment affects early embryonic development[J]. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2021, 34 (2): 203- 213. doi: 10.1071/RD21266
39	WILMUT I , SALES D I , ASHWORTH C J . Maternal and embryonic factors associated with prenatal loss in mammals[J]. J Reprod Fertil, 1986, 76 (2): 851- 864. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0760851
40	TARABORRELLI S . Physiology, production and action of progesterone[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2015, 94 (Suppl 161): 8- 16.
41	BAZER F W , JOHNSON G A . Early embryonic development in agriculturally important species[J]. Animals (Basel), 2024, 14 (13): 1882.
42	LOSORDO D W , ISNER J M . Estrogen and angiogenesis: A review[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2001, 21 (1): 6- 12. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.21.1.6
43	YU K , HUANG Z , XU X , et al. Estrogen receptor function: impact on the human endometrium[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13, 827724. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.827724
44	KELLY R W . Pregnancy maintenance and parturition: the role of prostaglandin in manipulating the immune and inflammatory response[J]. Endocr Rev, 1994, 15 (5): 684- 706. doi: 10.1210/edrv-15-5-684
45	NEPOMNASCHY P A , WELCH K B , MCCONNELL D S , et al. Cortisol levels and very early pregnancy loss in humans[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103 (10): 3938- 3942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511183103
46	ARCK P C . Stress and pregnancy loss: role of immune mediators, hormones and neurotransmitters[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2001, 46 (2): 117- 123. doi: 10.1111/j.8755-8920.2001.460201.x
47	ARCK P C , ROSE M , HERTWIG K , et al. Stress and immune mediators in miscarriage[J]. Hum Reprod, 2001, 16 (7): 1505- 1511. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1505
48	CHAPPEL S C , HOWLES C . Reevaluation of the roles of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in the ovulatory process[J]. Hum Reprod, 1991, 6 (9): 1206- 1212. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137513
49	RAJU G A R , CHAVAN R , DEENADAYAL M , et al. Luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone synergy: A review of role in controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation[J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2013, 6 (4): 227- 234. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.126285
50	FILICORI M . The role of luteinizing hormone in folliculogenesis and ovulation induction[J]. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71 (3): 405- 414. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00482-8
51	BUTLER W R , SMITH R D . Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1989, 72 (3): 767- 783. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
52	CHAGAS L M , BASS J J , BLACHE D , et al. Invited review: New perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90 (9): 4022- 4032. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-852
53	OTA E , DA SILVA LOPES K , MIDDLETON P , et al. Antenatal interventions for preventing stillbirth, fetal loss and perinatal death: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 12 (12): CD009599.
54	TOLEDO M Z , BAEZ G M , GARCIA-GUERRA A , et al. Effect of feeding rumen-protected methionine on productive and reproductive performance of dairy cows[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (12): e0189117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189117
55	AHSAN U , KAMRAN Z , RAZA I , et al. Role of selenium in male reproduction - a review[J]. Anim Reprod Sci, 2014, 146 (1-2): 55- 62. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.009
56	WANG R L , LIANG J G , LU L , et al. Effect of zinc source on performance, zinc status, immune response, and rumen fermentation of lactating cows[J]. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2013, 152 (1): 16- 24. doi: 10.1007/s12011-012-9585-4
57	BLANER W S , SHMARAKOV I O , TRABER M G . Vitamin A and vitamin E: Will the real antioxidant please stand up?[J]. Annu Rev Nutr, 2021, 41, 105- 131. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124228
58	KORICHO Z , ATOMSSA G E , MEKONNEN T C , et al. Dietary vitamin A intakes among pregnant women attending antenatal care in health facilities in Dessie Town, North East Ethiopia[J]. J Hum Nutr Diet, 2020, 33 (5): 678- 685. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12766
59	GE H , LIU W , LI H , et al. The association of vitamin D and vitamin E levels at birth with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2021, 56 (7): 2108- 2113. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25414
60	GRUMMER R R , CARROLL D J . Effects of dietary fat on metabolic disorders and reproductive performance of dairy cattle[J]. J Anim Sci, 1991, 69 (9): 3838- 3852. doi: 10.2527/1991.6993838x
61	ROCHE J F . The effect of nutritional management of the dairy cow on reproductive efficiency[J]. Anim Reprod Sci, 2006, 96 (3-4): 282- 296. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.007
62	MIETKIEWSKA K , KORDOWITZKI P , PAREEK C S . Effects of heat stress on bovine oocytes and early embryonic development-an update[J]. Cells, 2022, 11 (24): 4073. doi: 10.3390/cells11244073
63	SLIMEN I B , NAJAR T , GHRAM A , et al. Reactive oxygen species, heat stress and oxidative-induced mitochondrial damage. A review[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2014, 30 (7): 513- 523. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.971446
64	PSZCZOLA M , AGUILAR I , MISZTAL I . Short communication: Trends for monthly changes in days open in Holsteins[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92 (9): 4689- 4696. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1985
65	VAN ENGEN N K , COETZEE J F . Effects of transportation on cattle health and production: a review[J]. Anim Health Res Rev, 2018, 19 (2): 142- 154. doi: 10.1017/S1466252318000075
66	EDWARDS L M , RAHE C H , GRIFFIN J L , et al. Effect of transportation stress on ovarian function in superovulated Hereford heifers[J]. Theriogenology, 1987, 28 (3): 291- 299. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(87)90016-1
67	CHEBEL R C , SILVA P R B , ENDRES M I , et al. Social stressors and their effects on immunity and health of periparturient dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99 (4): 3217- 3228. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10369
68	FERNANDEZ-NOVO A , PEREZ-GARNELO S S , VILLAGRA A , et al. The effect of stress on reproduction and reproductive technologies in beef cattle-a review[J]. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10 (11): 2096.
69	MEE J F . Invited review: Bovine abortion-Incidence, risk factors and causes[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2023, 58 (Suppl 2): 23- 33.
70	MEE J F , JAWOR P , STEFANIAK T . Role of infection and immunity in bovine perinatal mortality: Part 1. causes and current diagnostic approaches[J]. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11 (4): 1033.
71	YU H , GU X , WANG D , et al. Brucella infection and Toll-like receptors[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2024, 14, 1342684. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1342684
72	Van LOO H , PASCOTTINI O B , RIBBENS S , et al. Retrospective study of factors associated with bovine infectious abortion and perinatal mortality[J]. Prev Vet Med, 2021, 191, 105366. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105366
73	LALSIAMTHARA J , LEE J H . Development and trial of vaccines against Brucella[J]. J Vet Sci, 2017, 18 (S1): 281- 290. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2017.18.S1.281
74	LIAUTARD J P , GROSS A , DORNAND J , et al. Interactions between professional phagocytes and Brucella spp[J]. Microbiologia, 1996, 12 (2): 197- 206.
75	MARTIROSYAN A , MORENO E , GORVEL J . An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen[J]. Immunol Rev, 2011, 240 (1): 211- 234. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00982.x
76	BARQUERO-CALVO E , CHAVES-OLARTE E , WEISS D S , et al. Brucella abortus uses a stealthy strategy to avoid activation of the innate immune system during the onset of infection[J]. PLoS One, 2007, 2 (7): e631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000631
77	DE FIGUEIREDO P , FICHT T A , RICE-FICHT A , et al. Pathogenesis and immunobiology of brucellosis: review of Brucella-host interactions[J]. Am J Pathol, 2015, 185 (6): 1505- 1517. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.003
78	ROSSETTI C A , DRAKE K L , SIDDAVATAM P , et al. Systems biology analysis of Brucella infected Peyer′s patch reveals rapid invasion with modest transient perturbations of the host transcriptome[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8 (12): e81719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081719
79	AYMEE L , MENDES J , LILENBAUM W . Bovine genital leptospirosis: An update of this important reproductive disease[J]. Animals (Basel), 2024, 14 (2): 322.
80	MOL J P S , PIRES S F , CHAPEAUROUGE A D , et al. Proteomic profile of brucella abortus-infected bovine chorioallantoic membrane explants[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11 (4): e0154209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154209
81	WEI Z , ZHANG S , WANG X , et al. Beyond survival to domination: Brucella′s multilayered strategies for evading host immune responses[J]. Front Microbiol, 2025, 16, 1608617. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1608617
82	YANTI Y , SUMIARTO B , KUSUMASTUTI T A , et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis and the brucellosis model at the individual level of dairy cattle in the West Bandung District, Indonesia[J]. Vet World, 2021, 14 (1): 1- 10. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1-10
83	FOSGATE G T , DIPTEE M D , RAMNANAN A , et al. Brucellosis in domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) of Trinidad and Tobago with comparative epidemiology to cattle[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2011, 43 (8): 1479- 1486. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9846-9
84	ZHANG H , DENG X , CUI B , et al. Abortion and various associated risk factors in dairy cow and sheep in Ili, China[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15 (10): e0232568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232568
85	OKUMU T A , JOHN N M , WABACHA J K , et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies for bovine viral diarrhoea virus, Brucella abortus and Neospora caninum, and their roles in the incidence of abortion/foetal loss in dairy cattle herds in Nakuru District, Kenya[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2019, 15 (1): 95. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1842-8
86	GAO Y , WANG S , DU R , et al. Isolation and identification of a bovine viral diarrhea virus from sika deer in china[J]. Virol J, 2011, 8, 83. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-83
87	PANG F , LONG Q , WEI M . Immune evasion strategies of bovine viral diarrhea virus[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2023, 13, 1282526. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1282526
88	NUGROHO W , SILITONGA R J P , REICHEL M P , et al. The epidemiology and control of bovine viral diarrhoea virus in tropical indonesian cattle[J]. Pathogens, 2022, 11 (2): 215. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020215
89	BEER M , CONRATHS F J , VAN DER POEL W H M . 'Schmallenberg virus'--a novel orthobunyavirus emerging in Europe[J]. Epidemiol Infect, 2013, 141 (1): 1- 8. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002245
90	MARTINELLE L , POSKIN A , Dal POZZO F , et al. Experimental infection of sheep at 45 and 60 days of gestation with schmallenberg virus readily led to placental colonization without causing congenital malformations[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10 (9): e0139375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139375
91	WERNIKE K , HOLSTEG M , SCHIRRMEIER H , et al. Natural infection of pregnant cows with Schmallenberg virus--a follow-up study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (5): e98223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098223
92	WUTHRICH M , LECHNER I , AEBI M , et al. A case-control study to estimate the effects of acute clinical infection with the Schmallenberg virus on milk yield, fertility and veterinary costs in Swiss dairy herds[J]. Prev Vet Med, 2016, 126, 54- 65. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.021
93	ABDULLAH H H A M , AMANZOUGAGHENE N , DAHMANA H , et al. Multiple vector-borne pathogens of domestic animals in Egypt[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2021, 15 (9): e0009767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009767
94	ROBI D T , MOSSIE T , TEMTEME S . Eukaryotic infections in dairy calves: Impacts, diagnosis, and strategies for prevention and control[J]. Vet Med (Auckl), 2023, 14, 195- 208.
95	SELIM A , ALSHAMMARI A , GATTAN H S , et al. Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle in Egypt: a serosurvey and associated risk factors[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13 (1): 15489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42538-8
96	JAWOR P , KROL D , MEE J F , et al. Infection exposure, detection and causes of death in perinatal mortalities in Polish dairy herds[J]. Theriogenology, 2017, 103, 130- 136. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.044
97	GRAHAM D A , SMYTH J A , MCLAREN I E , et al. Stillbirth/perinatal weak calf syndrome: serological examination for evidence of Neospora caninum infection[J]. Vet Rec, 1996, 139 (21): 523- 524. doi: 10.1136/vr.139.21.523
98	INNES E A , ANDRIANARIVO A G , BJORKMAN C , et al. Immune responses to Neospora caninum and prospects for vaccination[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2002, 18 (11): 497- 504. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02372-3
99	BUXTON D , MCALLISTER M M , DUBEY J P . The comparative pathogenesis of neosporosis[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2002, 18 (12): 546- 552. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02414-5
100	ROBERTSON S A . Immune regulation of conception and embryo implantation-all about quality control?[J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2010, 85 (1): 51- 57. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2010.01.008
101	DUBE-ZINATELLI E , MAYOTTE E , CAPPELLETTI L , et al. Impact of the maternal microbiome on neonatal immune development[J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2025, 170, 104542. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2025.104542
102	OLIVEIRA L J , BARRETO R S N , PERECIN F , et al. Modulation of maternal immune system during pregnancy in the cow[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2012, 47 (Suppl 4): 384- 393.
103	VAN MOURIK M S M , MACKLON N S , HEIJNEN C J . Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2009, 85 (1): 4- 19. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0708395
104	HANSEN P J , SOTO P , NATZKE R P . Mastitis and fertility in cattle - possible involvement of inflammation or immune activation in embryonic mortality[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2004, 51 (4): 294- 301. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00160.x
105	MAZIERO R R D , GUAITOLINI C R D F , GUASTI P N , et al. Effect of using two cryopreservation methods on viability and fertility of frozen stallion sperm[J]. J Equine Vet Sci, 2019, 72, 37- 40. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.10.008
106	WATSON P F . The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen[J]. Anim Reprod Sci, 2000, 60-61, 481- 492. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3
107	SAKKAS D , ALVAREZ J G . Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93 (4): 1027- 1036. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.046
108	PURSLEY J R , SILCOX R W , WILTBANK M C . Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss, and gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1998, 81 (8): 2139- 2144. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75790-X
109	RIBEIRO E S , GOMES G , GRECO L F , et al. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99 (3): 2201- 2220. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10337
110	SPELL A R , BEAL W E , CORAH L R , et al. Evaluating recipient and embryo factors that affect pregnancy rates of embryo transfer in beef cattle[J]. Theriogenology, 2001, 56 (2): 287- 297. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00563-5
111	HASLER J F . Factors affecting frozen and fresh embryo transfer pregnancy rates in cattle[J]. Theriogenology, 2001, 56 (9): 1401- 1415. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00643-4
112	JOHNSON G A , STEWART M D , GRAY C A , et al. Effects of the estrous cycle, pregnancy, and interferon tau on 2′, 5′-oligoadenylate synthetase expression in the ovine uterus[J]. Biol Reprod, 2001, 64 (5): 1392- 1399. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1392
113	YU H , ZHU W , YUAN Z , et al. A progesterone microneedle patch for self-administration in the prevention of preterm birth in a mouse model[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2025, 19, 2473- 2490. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S502701
114	SHAHIN M , FRIEDRICH M , GAULY M , et al. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) profile of Holstein-Friesian cows as compared to dual-purpose and beef cows[J]. Reprod Domest Anim, 2014, 49 (4): 618- 620. doi: 10.1111/rda.12336
115	SHEIKH A A , HOODA O K , KALYAN A , et al. Interferon-tau stimulated gene expression: A proxy to predict embryonic mortality in dairy cows[J]. Theriogenology, 2018, 120, 61- 67. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.07.028
116	SCULLY S , EVANS A C O , CARTER F , et al. Ultrasound monitoring of blood flow and echotexture of the corpus luteum and uterus during early pregnancy of beef heifers[J]. Theriogenology, 2015, 83 (3): 449- 458. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.009
117	BORS S , BORS A . Economics of rebreeding nonpregnant dairy cows diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography on day 25 after artificial insemination[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (6): 761.
118	KAREN A , BAJCSY A C , MINOIA R , et al. Relationship of progesterone, bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein-1 and nitric oxide with late embryonic and early fetal mortalities in dairy cows[J]. J Reprod Dev, 2014, 60 (2): 162- 167. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2013-033
119	LOPEZ-GATIUS F , SZENCI O . Clinical management of pregnancy-related problems between days 28 and 60 in the dairy cow[J]. Theriogenology, 2023, 206, 140- 148. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.04.024
120	SZENCI O . Recent Possibilities for the Diagnosis of Early Pregnancy and Embryonic Mortality in Dairy Cows[J]. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11 (6): 1666.
121	ROMANO J E , THOMPSON J A , FORREST D W , et al. Early pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography in dairy cattle[J]. Theriogenology, 2006, 66 (4): 1034- 1041. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.044
122	FRICKE P M . Scanning the future--ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002, 85 (8): 1918- 1926. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74268-9
123	YAN L , ROBINSON R , SHI Z , et al. Efficacy of progesterone supplementation during early pregnancy in cows: A meta-analysis[J]. Theriogenology, 2016, 85 (8): 1390- 1398. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.12.027
124	MARTINS J P N , WANG D , MU N , et al. Level of circulating concentrations of progesterone during ovulatory follicle development affects timing of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2018, 101 (11): 10505- 10525. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14410
125	NYMAN S , GUSTAFSSON H , BERGLUND B . Extent and pattern of pregnancy losses and progesterone levels during gestation in Swedish Red and Swedish Holstein dairy cows[J]. Acta Vet Scand, 2018, 60 (1): 68. doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0420-6
126	OMONTESE B O , GOMES G C , SANTOS A R , et al. Use of on-farm milk progesterone information to predict fertility outcomes in dairy cows subjected to timed artificial insemination[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2020, 103 (7): 6600- 6611. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17405
127	PEIXOTO P M , HUBNER A M , JUNIOR W M C , et al. Characterization of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and progesterone as a predictor of twins and conceptus loss in high-risk-pregnancy Holstein cows[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2021, 104 (4): 5034- 5046. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19334
128	PARR M H , MULLEN M P , CROWE M A , et al. Relationship between pregnancy per artificial insemination and early luteal concentrations of progesterone and establishment of repeatability estimates for these traits in Holstein-Friesian heifers[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2012, 95 (5): 2390- 2396. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4498
129	SIQUEIRA L G B , TORRES C A A , AMORIM L S , et al. Interrelationships among morphology, echotexture, and function of the bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle[J]. Anim Reprod Sci, 2009, 115 (1-4): 18- 28. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.11.009
130	MIYAMOTO A , SHIRASUNA K , HAYASHI K , et al. A potential use of color ultrasound as a tool for reproductive management: New observations using color ultrasound scanning that were not possible with imaging only in black and white[J]. J Reprod Dev, 2006, 52 (1): 153- 160. doi: 10.1262/jrd.17087
131	KANAZAWA T , SEKI M , IGA K . Early pregnancy diagnosis based on luteal morphology and blood flow on days 17-21 post-artificial insemination in Japanese Black cattle[J]. Theriogenology, 2022, 181, 69- 78. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.01.002
132	BALHARA A K , GUPTA M , SINGH S , et al. Early pregnancy diagnosis in bovines: current status and future directions[J]. Sci World J, 2013, 2013, 958540. doi: 10.1155/2013/958540
133	WALLACE R M , POHLER K G , SMITH M F , et al. Placental PAGs: gene origins, expression patterns, and use as markers of pregnancy[J]. Reproduction, 2015, 149 (3): R115- R126. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0485
134	SANTOS G M G D , JUNIOR L B , SILVA-SANTOS K C , et al. Conception rate and pregnancy loss in fixed-time cattle embryo transfer programs are related to the luteal blood perfusion but not to the corpus luteum size[J]. Theriogenology, 2023, 210, 251- 255. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.07.039
135	WIJMA R , STANGAFERRO M L , KAMAT M M , et al. Embryo mortality around the period of maintenance of the corpus luteum causes alterations to the ovarian function of lactating dairy cows[J]. Biol Reprod, 2016, 95 (5): 112. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.142075
136	DOMINGUES R R , ANDRADE J P N , CUNHA T O , et al. Profiles of interferon-stimulated genes in multiple tissues and circulating pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and their association with pregnancy loss in dairy cowsdagger[J]. Biol Reprod, 2024, 110 (3): 558- 568. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad164
137	YOSHINO H , KIZAKI K , HIRATA T , et al. Interferon-stimulated gene expression in peripheral blood leucocytes as a convenient prediction marker for embryo status in embryo-transferred Japanese Black cows during the peri-implantation period[J]. Vet Sci, 2023, 10 (7): 408.
138	CASANO A B , MENCHETTI L , TRABALZA-MARINUCCI M , et al. Gene expression of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins-1 (PAG-1), interferon-tau (IFNt) and interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) as diagnostic and prognostic markers of maternal-fetal cellular interaction in buffalo cows[J]. Theriogenology, 2023, 209, 89- 97. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.06.028
139	REITH S , HOY S . Review: Behavioral signs of estrus and the potential of fully automated systems for detection of estrus in dairy cattle[J]. Animal, 2018, 12 (2): 398- 407. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117001975
140	MOTTRAM T . Animal board invited review: precision livestock farming for dairy cows with a focus on oestrus detection[J]. Animal, 2016, 10 (10): 1575- 1584. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002517
141	CORTES-ALBORNOZ M C , GARCIA-GUAQUETA D P , VELEZ-VAN-MEERBEKE A , et al. Maternal nutrition and neurodevelopment: A scoping review[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13 (10): 3530. doi: 10.3390/nu13103530
142	GILBERT R O . Management of reproductive disease in dairy cows[J]. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 2016, 32 (2): 387- 410. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.01.009
143	DASH S , CHAKRAVARTY A K , SINGH A , et al. Effect of heat stress on reproductive performances of dairy cattle and buffaloes: A review[J]. Vet World, 2016, 9 (3): 235- 244. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.235-244
144	BAYNE J E , WATERS K M , ARMSTRONG C L . Biosecurity principles for reproductive diseases of cattle[J]. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 2025, 41 (1): 55- 69. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2024.11.008
145	ADNANE M , CHAPWANYA A . Microbial gatekeepers of fertility in the female reproductive microbiome of cattle[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25 (20): 10923. doi: 10.3390/ijms252010923
146	KAUR U , MALACCO V M R , BAI H , et al. Invited review: integration of technologies and systems for precision animal agriculture-a case study on precision dairy farming[J]. J Anim Sci, 2023, 3, 101.

[1]	张紫璇, 于雯靖, 王中华, 董旭晟, 侯秋玲. 奶牛乳腺发育评估技术及应用研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4176-4190.
[2]	曹晓瑶, 汪聪勇, 王亭, 熊兰玲, 于河洋, 王泽昭, 高会江, 李俊雅, 朱波. 华西牛群体生长发育性状遗传参数估计及其遗传进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4355-4368.
[3]	郑云畅, 侯睿霖, 梁晓贺, 杨利丹, 张银蛟, 霍浩楠, 陈玮娜, 张萃, 李世杰. 牛FOXP2基因的单等位基因表达和DNA甲基化状态分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4369-4378.
[4]	王蕊, 衡诺, 胡樱凡, 王欢, 朱妮, 何维, 轩秀丽, 胡智辉, 熊铿, 巩建飞, 郝海生, 朱化彬, 赵善江. 不同等级牛卵丘-卵母细胞复合体体外成熟后卵母细胞发育能力差异的机制分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4432-4451.
[5]	夏春秋, 苗舒, 李志青, 刘磊, 万发春, 沈维军. 缬氨酸通过AMPK/mTOR信号通路调控牛成肌细胞增殖[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4491-4506.
[6]	马思琪, 吕雯雯, 陈俊贞, 李建林, 刘昱成, 关团, 丁剑, 刘浩然, 叶鸿艳, 杨莉, 付强, 史慧君. 牛肠病毒VP1基因重组腺病毒的构建及其对小鼠的免疫原性评价[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4615-4625.
[7]	杨书博, 苑庆欣, 陈麒百, 王培, 高东阳, 李鹤, 宋军. 金黄色葡萄球菌噬菌体脂质体的制备及胞内抗菌活性[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4638-4645.
[8]	刘佳金, 温小庆, 罗春海, 贾红豆, 王薇, 李丹阳, 付世新. FoxO1对高NEFA诱导的奶牛子宫内膜上皮细胞凋亡因子表达的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4708-4717.
[9]	杨文哲, 王锦浩, 赵子琛, 赵彤, 潘飞龙, 陈芳芳, 邵雯琪, 刘克祥, 赵树臣, 赵立佳. 姜黄素影响铁死亡途径缓解LPS诱导牛乳腺上皮细胞炎性反应的分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(9): 4730-4740.
[10]	万琼飞, 石闪闪, 郭若楠, 吕航, 胡德宝, 郭益文, 张林林, 丁向彬, 郭宏, 李新. 牛胚胎期肌肉发育关键lncRNA的筛选及功能分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3802-3812.
[11]	李伉, 陈思颍, 孙雅雯, 冷璇, 王栋, 崔凯, 庞云渭. 甜菜碱对猪孤雌激活胚胎体外发育的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3826-3836.
[12]	袁越, 周建旭, 罗晓林, 官久强, 安添午, 赵洪文, 柏琴, 任子利, 张翔飞, 赵彦玲. 过瘤胃脂肪对育肥牦牛生产性能、血清生化及屠宰性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3849-3860.
[13]	包小平, 崔俊伟, 赵玉龙, 郭成, 陈明, 毕研亮. 产后不同挤奶时间对初乳品质及不同品质初乳对新生犊牛被动免疫转移的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3861-3871.
[14]	王琳玮, 王靖, 韩赛波, 李涵川, 王盼盼, 郭刚, 蒋林树. 植物精油对哺乳期犊牛血清免疫及生化指标影响的Meta分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3872-3892.
[15]	时文健, 徐磊, 张泽, 杨蕊, 辛凌翔, 王楠, 陈祥, 鑫婷. 基于结核分枝杆菌牛变种C68001随机突变体库筛选和鉴定成膜相关基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(8): 3992-4006.