蛋鸡啄羽行为的影响因素与遗传调控基础研究进展

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.09.001

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 3745-3756.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.09.001

蛋鸡啄羽行为的影响因素与遗传调控基础研究进展

章琦¹^,²(), 郭江鹏³, 倪爱心¹^,⁴, 杜洪峰¹, 陈继兰¹^,*(), 孙研研¹^,*()

1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所畜禽生物育种全国重点实验室，北京 100193
2. 青岛农业大学动物科技学院，青岛 266109
3. 北京市畜牧总站，北京 100107
4. 瓦赫宁根大学及研究中心动物育种与基因组课题组，瓦赫宁根 6700AH

收稿日期:2024-03-06 出版日期:2024-09-23 发布日期:2024-09-27
通讯作者: 陈继兰,孙研研 E-mail:zqqzshh1012@163.com;chen.jilan@163.com;yanyansun2014@163.com
作者简介:章琦(2001-)，女，安徽铜陵人，硕士生，主要从事鸡遗传育种研究，E-mail：zqqzshh1012@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系国家蛋鸡体系(CARS-40);中国农业科学院科技创新工程(ASTIP-IAS-16);北京市家禽创新团队(BAIC06-2023)

Research Progress on Influencing Factors and Genetic Architecture of Feather Pecking in Laying Hens

Qi ZHANG¹^,²(), Jiangpeng GUO³, Aixin NI¹^,⁴, Hongfeng DU¹, Jilan CHEN¹^,*(), Yanyan SUN¹^,*()

1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
3. Beijing Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Beijing 100107, China
4. Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700AH, Netherlands

Received:2024-03-06 Online:2024-09-23 Published:2024-09-27
Contact: Jilan CHEN, Yanyan SUN E-mail:zqqzshh1012@163.com;chen.jilan@163.com;yanyansun2014@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

啄羽是蛋鸡生产中一个常见的严重破坏行为，会造成被啄鸡羽毛和皮肤受损，甚至相互啄食导致鸡只死亡。啄羽不仅对蛋鸡的健康和福祉造成了负面影响，也进一步影响蛋鸡养殖效益，因此受到蛋鸡产业和研究的广泛关注。本文将综合已有的研究成果，探讨蛋鸡啄羽行为的外在影响因素和遗传调控机制，以促进对蛋鸡啄羽行为的深入理解，并提出未来研究方向。为制定可持续解决方案，进一步改善蛋鸡福利水平和提高生产效益奠定基础。

关键词: 蛋鸡, 啄羽, 动物福利, 影响因素, 行为学

Abstract:

Feather pecking is a common and serious act of destruction in the production of laying hens, which can cause damage to the feathers and skin of the pecked chickens, and even results in mortality. Feather pecking not only does negative impact on the health and well-being of laying hens, but also further affects the benefit of farming layers, therefore received extensive attention from the layer industry and research. This review aims to synthesize the existing research results to explore the external influencing factors and genetic regulatory mechanisms of feather pecking behavior of laying hens, so as to promote the in-depth understanding of feather pecking behavior of laying hens, and put forward future research directions. This provides the basis for developing sustainable solutions, improving the welfare of laying hens, and increasing production efficiency.

Key words: laying hens, feather pecking, animal welfare, factors, ethology

中图分类号:

章琦, 郭江鹏, 倪爱心, 杜洪峰, 陈继兰, 孙研研. 蛋鸡啄羽行为的影响因素与遗传调控基础研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(9): 3745-3756.

Qi ZHANG, Jiangpeng GUO, Aixin NI, Hongfeng DU, Jilan CHEN, Yanyan SUN. Research Progress on Influencing Factors and Genetic Architecture of Feather Pecking in Laying Hens[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(9): 3745-3756.

图/表 4

表 1

图 1

图 2

表 2

参考文献 87

1	RODENBURG T B , VAN KRIMPEN M M , DE JONG I C , et al. The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2013, 69 (2): 361- 374. doi: 10.1017/S0043933913000354
2	KITTELSEN K E , TAHAMTANI F , MOE R O , et al. Flock factors correlated with elevated mortality in non-beak trimmed aviary-housed layers[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (24): 3577.
3	DRAKE K A , DONNELLY C A , DAWKINS M S . Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens[J]. Br Poult Sci, 2010, 51 (6): 725- 733. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.528751
4	EL-LETHEY H , AERNI V , JUNGI T W , et al. Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions[J]. Br Poult Sci, 2000, 41 (1): 22- 28. doi: 10.1080/00071660086358
5	杨断利, 王永胜, 陈辉, 等. 基于改进YOLO v6-tiny的蛋鸡啄羽行为识别与个体分类[J]. 农业机械学报, 2023, 54 (5): 268- 277.
	YANG D L , WANG Y S , CHEN H , et al. Feather pecking abnormal behavior identification and individual classification method of laying hens based on improved YOLO v6-tiny[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54 (5): 268- 277.
6	LAMBTON S L , KNOWLES T G , YORKE C , et al. The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2010, 123 (1-2): 32- 42. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.12.010
7	BIST R B , SUBEDI S , YANG X , et al. Effective strategies for mitigating feather pecking and cannibalism in cage-free w-36 pullets[J]. Poultry, 2023, 2 (2): 281- 291. doi: 10.3390/poultry2020021
8	刘翔雨, 霍浩然, 段树楠, 等. 五域模型的发展完善及其在农场动物福利评估中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54 (10): 4073- 4082.
	LIU X Y , HUO H R , DUAN S N , et al. The development and improvement of the five domains model and application in farm animal welfare assessment[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54 (10): 4073- 4082.
9	BLOKHUIS H J , VAN NIEKERK T F , BESSEI W , et al. The laywel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2007, 63 (1): 101- 114. doi: 10.1017/S0043933907001328
10	HEERKENS J L T , DELEZIE E , KEMPEN I , et al. Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2015, 94 (9): 2008- 2017. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev187
11	SINGH M , RUHNKE I , DE KONING C , et al. Demographics and practices of semi-intensive free-range farming systems in Australia with an outdoor stocking density of ≤1500 hens/hectare[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (10): e0187057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187057
12	BESTMAN M , KOENE P , WAGENAAR J P . Influence of farm factors on the occurrence of feather pecking in organic reared hens and their predictability for feather pecking in the laying period[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2009, 121 (2): 120- 125. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.007
13	SUN Y , ELLEN E D , VAN DER POEL J J , et al. Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: variance component and trait-based approach[J]. Poult Sci, 2014, 93 (4): 773- 783. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03367
14	RIEDSTRA B , GROOTHUIS T G G . Early feather pecking as a form of social exploration: the effect of group stability on feather pecking and tonic immobility in domestic chicks[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2002, 77 (2): 127- 138. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00031-X
15	AERNI V , EL-LETHEY H , WECHSLER B . Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens[J]. Br Poult Sci, 2000, 41 (1): 16- 21. doi: 10.1080/00071660086349
16	MENS A J W , VAN KRIMPEN M M , KWAKKEL R P . Nutritional approaches to reduce or prevent feather pecking in laying hens: any potential to intervene during rearing?[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2020, 76 (3): 591- 610. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2020.1772024
17	常心雨, 王继光, 王晶, 等. 商品蛋鸡精准饲养技术研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54 (5): 1815- 1823.
	CHANG X Y , WANG J G , WANG J , et al. Research progress of precision rearing technology for commercial layers[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54 (5): 1815- 1823.
18	SCHWARZER A , RAUCH E , BERGMANN S , et al. Risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in non-beak-trimmed pullets and laying hens on commercial farms[J]. Appl Sci, 2022, 12 (19): 9699. doi: 10.3390/app12199699
19	ZEPP M , LOUTON H , ERHARD M , et al. The influence of stocking density and enrichment on the occurrence of feather pecking and aggressive pecking behavior in laying hen chicks[J]. J Vet Behav, 2018, 24, 9- 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.12.005
20	BILČÍK B , KEELING L J . Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2000, 68 (1): 55- 66. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00089-7
21	KJAER J B , VESTERGAARD K S . Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1999, 62 (2-3): 243- 254. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00217-2
22	NICOL C J , BESTMAN M , GILANI A M , et al. The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2013, 69 (4): 775- 788. doi: 10.1017/S0043933913000809
23	RIBER A B , GUZMAN D A . Effects of dark brooders on behavior and fearfulness in layers[J]. Animals (Basel), 2016, 6 (1): 3.
24	RIEDSTRA B , GROOTHUIS T G G . Prenatal light exposure affects early feather-pecking behaviour in the domestic chick[J]. Anim Behav, 2004, 67 (6): 1037- 1042. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.009
25	杜永所, 刘瑞磊, 庞利娜. 可调节照明设备对光照强度和蛋雏鸡啄羽影响的研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021, (15): 61- 64.
	DU Y S , LIU R L , PANG L N . Effect of adjustable lighting equipment on light intensity and feather pecking in laying chickens[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, (15): 61- 64.
26	GENG A L , ZHANG Y , ZHANG J , et al. Lighting pattern and photoperiod affect the range use and feather cover of native laying hens under free range condition[J]. Poult Sci, 2023, 102 (1): 102264. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102264
27	FALKER-GIESKE C , BENNEWITZ J , TETENS J . The light response in chickens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior reveals mechanistic insights towards psychiatric disorders[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2022, 49 (2): 1649- 1654. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-07111-4
28	NORDQUIST R E , ZEINSTRA E C , DOUGHERTY A , et al. Effects of dark brooder rearing and age on hypothalamic vasotocin and feather corticosterone levels in laying hens[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2020, 7, 19. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00019
29	SIROVNIK J , RIBER A B . Why-oh-why?Dark brooders reduce injurious pecking, though are still not widely used in commercial rearing of layer pullets[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (10): 1276.
30	SHI H P , LI B M , TONG Q , et al. Effects of led light color and intensity on feather pecking and fear responses of layer breeders in natural mating colony cages[J]. Animals (Basel), 2019, 9 (10): 814.
31	ÖZKANS, YALÇINS, BAYRAKTARÖ H, 等. Effects of incubation lighting with green or white light on brown layers: hatching performance, feather pecking and hypothalamic expressions of genes related with photoreception, serotonin, and stress systems[J]. Poult Sci, 2022, 101 (11): 102114.
32	KJAER J B , BESSEI W . The interrelationships of nutrition and feather pecking in the domestic fowl-a review[J]. Arch Geflugelkd, 2013, 77 (1): 1- 9.
33	李梦瑶, 王长平. 蛋白浓度对育成期蛋鸡啄羽及羽毛损伤状况的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2020, (9): 91- 94.
	LI M Y , WANG C P . The effects of protein concentration on feather pecking and plumage damage of laying hens during incubation period[J]. China Feed, 2020, (9): 91- 94.
34	宫浩阳, 吴佳鑫, 杨晓钰, 等. 肠道菌群抗病毒机制研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54 (12): 4910- 4919.
	GONG H Y , WU J X , YANG X Y , et al. Research progress in antiviral mechanism of intestinal microflora[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54 (12): 4910- 4919.
35	VAN HIEU T , QUI N H , QUYEN N T K . Mitigating feather pecking behavior in laying poultry production through tryptophan supplementation[J]. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 2022, 10 (2): 2211.
36	刘萌, 黄晨轩, 陈一凡, 等. 饲粮色氨酸水平对本交笼蛋种鸡羽毛损伤、生产性能和犬尿氨酸代谢的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34 (12): 7770- 7780.
	LIU M , HUANG C X , CHEN Y F , et al. Effects of dietary tryptophan level on feather damage, performance and kynurenine metabolism of laying breeders in natural mating cage[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34 (12): 7770- 7780.
37	DESBRUSLAIS A , WEALLEANS A , GONZALEZ-SANCHEZ D , et al. Dietary fibre in laying hens: a review of effects on performance, gut health and feather pecking[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2021, 77 (4): 797- 823. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2021.1960236
38	PATT A , HALLE I , DUDDE A , et al. Influence of different dietary fibre contents in the diet on feather pecking, locomotor activity and performance of laying hens[J]. Br Poult Sci, 2022, 63 (5): 571- 580. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2022.2076212
39	VAN KRIMPEN M M , KWAKKEL R P , VAN DER PEET-SCHWERING C M C , et al. Low dietary energy concentration, high nonstarch polysaccharide concentration, and coarse particle sizes of nonstarch polysaccharides affect the behavior of feather-pecking-prone laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2008, 87 (3): 485- 496. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00279
40	SCHREITER R , FREICK M . Flock-level risk factors of litter condition for the occurrence of plumage damage and skin lesions in commercial laying hen farms[J]. Poult Sci, 2023, 102 (7): 102705. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102705
41	NEWBERRY R C . Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1995, 44 (2-4): 229- 243. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-Z
42	WECHSLER B , HUBER-EICHER B . The effect of foraging material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1998, 58 (1-2): 131- 141. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00137-8
43	XU D , SHU G , LIU Y T , et al. Farm environmental enrichments improve the welfare of layer chicks and pullets: a comprehensive review[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (19): 2610.
44	CAMPBELL D L M , DE HAAS E N , LEE C . A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development[J]. Poult Sci, 2019, 98 (1): 9- 28. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey319
45	RUDKIN C . Feather pecking and foraging uncorrelated-the redirection hypothesis revisited[J]. Br Poult Sci, 2022, 63 (3): 265- 273. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2021.1972935
46	TAHAMTANI F M , BRANTSÆTER M , NORDGREEN J , et al. Effects of litter provision during early rearing and environmental enrichment during the production phase on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2016, 95 (12): 2747- 2756. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew265
47	TAHAMTANI F M , NORDGREEN J , BRANTSÆTER M , et al. Does early environmental complexity influence tyrosine hydroxylase in the chicken hippocampus and "prefrontal" caudolateral nidopallium?[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2016, 3, 8.
48	JANCZAK A M , RIBER A B . Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2015, 94 (7): 1454- 1469. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev123
49	DE HAAS E N , BOLHUIS J E , DE JONG I C , et al. Predicting feather damage in laying hens during the laying period.Is it the past or is it the present?[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2014, 160, 75- 85. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.009
50	GILANI A M , KNOWLES T G , NICOL C J . The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2013, 148 (1-2): 54- 63. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.014
51	DE JONG I C , REUVEKAMP B F J , GUNNINK H . Can substrate in early rearing prevent feather pecking in adult laying hens?[J]. Anim Welf, 2013, 22 (3): 305- 314. doi: 10.7120/09627286.22.3.305
52	DIXON L M , DUNCAN I J H , MASON G J . Effects of four types of enrichment on feather-pecking behaviour in laying hens housed in barren environments[J]. Anim Welf, 2010, 19 (4): 429- 435. doi: 10.1017/S0962728600001913
53	MCADIE T M , KEELING L J , BLOKHUIS H J , et al. Reduction in feather pecking and improvement of feather condition with the presentation of a string device to chickens[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2005, 93 (1-2): 67- 80. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.09.004
54	IQBAL Z , DRAKE K , SWICK R A , et al. Effect of pecking stones and age on feather cover, hen mortality, and performance in free-range laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2020, 99 (5): 2307- 2314. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.068
55	SCHWARZER A , ERHARD M , SCHMIDT P , et al. Effects of stocking rate and environmental enrichment on the ontogeny of pecking behavior of laying hen pullets confined in aviary compartments during the first 4 weeks of life[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (19): 2639.
56	SON J , LEE W D , KIM H J , et al. Effect of providing environmental enrichment into aviary house on the welfare of laying hens[J]. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12 (9): 1165.
57	曹诗文. 不同声源及饲养密度对绿壳蛋鸡行为及生理的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2023.
	CAO S W. Effects of sound sources and stocking densities on behavior and physiology of green shell layers[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2023. (in Chinese)
58	ZHAO S , ZHANG R X , LI C , et al. The effect of short-term classical music stimulus on behavior and tonic immobility reaction of pullets[J]. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 2023, 26 (3): 386- 392. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.1983724
59	VAN STAAVEREN N , ELLIS J , BAES C F , et al. A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2021, 100 (2): 397- 411. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.006
60	SCHREITER R , DAMME K , VON BORELL E , et al. Effects of litter and additional enrichment elements on the occurrence of feather pecking in pullets and laying hens-a focused review[J]. Vet Med Sci, 2019, 5 (4): 500- 507. doi: 10.1002/vms3.184
61	WYSOCKI M , BESSEI W , KJAER J B , et al. Genetic and physiological factors influencing feather pecking in chickens[J]. World's Poultry Sci J, 2010, 66 (4): 659- 672. doi: 10.1017/S0043933910000644
62	SEDLAČKOVÁ M , BILČÍK B , KOŠŤÁ L . Feather pecking in laying hens: environmental and endogenous factors[J]. Acta Vet Brno, 2004, 73 (4): 521- 531. doi: 10.2754/avb200473040521
63	KOPS M S , DE HAAS E N , RODENBURG T B , et al. Effects of feather pecking phenotype (severe feather peckers, victims and non-peckers) on serotonergic and dopaminergic activity in four brain areas of laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus)[J]. Physiol Behav, 2013, 120, 77- 82. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.07.007
64	VAN HIERDEN Y M , KORTE S M , RUESINK E W , et al. Adrenocortical reactivity and central serotonin and dopamine turnover in young chicks from a high and low feather-pecking line of laying hens[J]. Physiol Behav, 2002, 75 (5): 653- 659. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00667-4
65	HUANG C X , HAO E Y , YUE Q X , et al. Malfunctioned inflammatory response and serotonin metabolism at the microbiota-gut-brain axis drive feather pecking behavior in laying hens[J]. Poult Sci, 2023, 102 (8): 102686. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102686
66	HUANG C X , YUE Q X , CHEN Y F , et al. Effects of in ovo injection of serotonin on behavior and hypothalamic genes expression in post hatch-chicks[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2021, 234, 105176. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105176
67	HU J Y , JOHNSON T A , ZHANG H M , et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis: gut microbiota modulates conspecific aggression in diversely selected laying hens[J]. Microorganisms, 2022, 10 (6): 1081. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061081
68	VAN STAAVEREN N , KRUMMA J , FORSYTHE P , et al. Cecal motility and the impact of lactobacillus in feather pecking laying hens[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10 (1): 12978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69928-6
69	JADHAV V V , HAN J , FASINA Y , et al. Connecting gut microbiomes and short chain fatty acids with the serotonergic system and behavior in Gallus gallus and other avian species[J]. Front Physiol, 2022, 13, 1035538. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1035538
70	VAN DER EIJK J A J , DE VRIES H , KJAER J B , et al. Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking[J]. Poult Sci, 2019, 98 (12): 7009- 7021. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez336
71	VAN DER EIJK J A J , RODENBURG T B , DE VRIES H , et al. Early-life microbiota transplantation affects behavioural responses, serotonin and immune characteristics in chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10 (1): 2750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59125-w
72	WANG C , LI Y L , WANG H L , et al. Differences in peripheral and central metabolites and gut microbiome of laying hens with different feather-pecking phenotypes[J]. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14, 1132866. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132866
73	KJAER J B , SØRENSEN P , SU G . Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus)[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2001, 71 (3): 229- 239. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00184-2
74	GRAMS V , WELLMANN R , PREUSS S , et al. Genetic parameters and signatures of selection in two divergent laying hen lines selected for feather pecking behaviour[J]. Genet Sel Evol, 2015, 47 (1): 77. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0154-0
75	IFFLAND H , WELLMANN R , SCHMID M , et al. Genomewide mapping of selection signatures and genes for extreme feather pecking in two divergently selected laying hen lines[J]. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10 (2): 262.
76	BUITENHUIS A J , KJAER J B , LABOURIAU R , et al. Altered circulating levels of serotonin and immunological changes in laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior[J]. Poult Sci, 2006, 85 (10): 1722- 1728. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.10.1722
77	BISCARINI F , BOVENHUIS H , VAN DER POEL J , et al. Across-line snp association study for direct and associative effects on feather damage in laying hens[J]. Behav Genet, 2010, 40 (5): 715- 727. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9370-0
78	FALKER-GIESKE C , MOTT A , PREUß S , et al. Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking[J]. BMC Genom, 2020, 21 (1): 595. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07002-1
79	MOTT A C , MOTT A , PREUß S , et al. eQTL analysis of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking identifies KLF14 as a potential key regulator for this behavioral disorder[J]. Front Genet, 2022, 13, 969752. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.969752
80	FALKER-GIESKE C , BENNEWITZ J , TETENS J . Structural variation and eQTL analysis in two experimental populations of chickens divergently selected for feather-pecking behavior[J]. Neurogenetics, 2023, 24 (1): 29- 41.
81	FALKER-GIESKE C , IFFLAND H , PREUß S , et al. Meta-analyses of genome wide association studies in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking using imputed sequence level genotypes[J]. BMC Genet, 2020, 21 (1): 114. doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00920-9
82	ELLEN E D , BIJMA P . Can breeders solve mortality due to feather pecking in laying hens?[J]. Poult Sci, 2019, 98 (9): 3431- 3442. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez250
83	WANG Z S , DOEKES H , BIJMA P . Towards genetic improvement of social behaviours in livestock using large-scale sensor data: data simulation and genetic analysis[J]. Genet Sel Evol, 2023, 55 (1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00840-z
84	KJAER J B , SØRENSEN P . Feather pecking behaviour in white leghorns, a genetic study[J]. Br Poult Sci, 1997, 38 (4): 333- 341. doi: 10.1080/00071669708417999
85	RODENBURG T B , BUITENHUIS A J , ASK B , et al. Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages[J]. Poult Sci, 2003, 82 (6): 861- 867. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.6.861
86	BENNEWITZ J , BÖGELEIN S , STRATZ P , et al. Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F₂-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models[J]. Poult Sci, 2014, 93 (4): 810- 817. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03638
87	GRAMS V , BÖGELEIN S , GRASHORN M A , et al. Quantitative genetic analysis of traits related to fear and feather pecking in laying hens[J]. Behav Genet, 2015, 45 (2): 228- 235. doi: 10.1007/s10519-014-9695-1

行为 Behavior	描述 Description
温和啄羽 Gentle feather pecking	啄羽鸡温柔地轻啄羽毛，被啄鸡通常没有反应，颈部保持静止
严重啄羽 Severe feather pecking	啄羽鸡严重地啄食羽毛，被啄鸡反应强烈，颈部扭动
攻击性啄食 Aggressive pecking	啄羽鸡带有支配性地啄食，通常直接攻击头部、颈部或背部

周龄 Week	群体 Breed	性状描述 Character description	遗传力 Heritability	文献 Reference
6、38、69	白来航	鸡只发出啄羽的次数	0.06、0.14、0.38	[84]
6、38、69	白来航	鸡只发出啄羽的回合次数	0.13、0.13、0.35	[84]
6、38、69	白来航	鸡只接收啄羽的次数	0.15、0.00、0.04	[84]
6、38、69	白来航	鸡只接收啄羽的回合次数	0.15、0.00、0.00	[84]
6、30	白来航啄羽性状F2群体	鸡只发出啄羽的次数	0.00、0.07	[85]
6、30	白来航啄羽性状F2群体	鸡只发出啄羽的回合次数	0.00、0.06	[85]
27	白来航啄羽性状F2群体	鸡只发出啄羽的次数	0.11	[86]
27	白来航啄羽性状F2群体	鸡只被啄羽的次数	<0.01	[86]
27	白来航啄羽性状F2群体	鸡只发出啄羽的次数	0.14	[87]

[1]	于秀菊, 胡燕姣, 刘佳悦, 王海东, 朱芷葳, 范阔海, 王蓉蓉, 段承昊, 石佳炜, 杨丽华. 一株鸡源唾液乳杆菌的分离鉴定及其对育雏早期蛋鸡肠道健康的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(9): 4161-4171.
[2]	杨亚新, 刘慧敏, 孟璐, 叶巧燕, 佀博学, 王加启, 郑楠. 生乳酸度分析及影响因素研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(7): 2836-2845.
[3]	王晓旭, 陈艳青, 张家麒, 王野, 王蕊, 于翰林, 杨凯淇, 包军, 张润祥. 爪趾皮肤炎对富集笼养蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质、行为和免疫的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2680-2691.
[4]	段益欣, 张林云, 赵永聚. SNP遗传力估计方法、影响因素及其在畜禽育种中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1854-1865.
[5]	李铁, 齐梦迪, 张克英, 王建萍, 白世平, 曾秋凤, 彭焕伟, 玄月, 吕莉, 丁雪梅. 育雏育成期饲粮添加益生菌对蛋鸡生长性能、血清指标、肠道健康及后续生产性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1062-1076.
[6]	常馨丹, 胡帆, 伍志武, 叶炳森, 刘铁海, 林杰, 贺志雄, 谭支良. 日粮添加高比例过瘤胃脂肪对生长肉用绵羊采食行为的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1077-1084.
[7]	片慧芳, 杜旭彬, 李妍, 张雨辰, 何惠, 虞德兵. 甜菜碱对产蛋后期蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质和抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1085-1094.
[8]	任钰为, 陈星, 林燕宁, 黄潇仙, 洪玲玲, 王峰, 孙瑞萍, 张艳, 刘海隆, 郑心力, 晁哲. 基于全基因组重测序研究文昌鸡产蛋性能的影响因素[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(2): 502-514.
[9]	郭妍婷, 周建民, 王晶, 齐广海. 产蛋鸡子宫部钙离子转运及调控的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 39-50.
[10]	卢建, 张欣, 江栋材, 马猛, 王强, 王星果, 李永峰, 郭军, 窦套存, 胡玉萍, 李尚民, 邵丹, 曲亮. 甘氨酸锰对产蛋后期蛋鸡产蛋性能和肠道微生物的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 218-231.
[11]	茹盟, 曾文惠, 彭剑玲, 曾庆节, 殷超, 崔勇, 魏庆, 梁海平, 谢贤华, 黄建珍. 蛋鸡卵泡发育及其表观遗传调控机制研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(9): 3613-3622.
[12]	韩坤良, 兰伟, 胡新, 崔亚东, 孔祥峰. 复方中药超微粉对蛋鸡抗氧化性能及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(9): 3784-3792.
[13]	安宗麒, 占思远, 李利, 张红平. circRNA作为ceRNA调控畜禽重要经济性状的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2215-2222.
[14]	王静宇, 樊姝琪, 黎成, 尹宁, 庄彬贤, 刘慧铭, 温永仙. 我国猪丹毒疫情的时空特征及其影响因素[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2528-2542.
[15]	常心雨, 王继光, 王晶, 张海军, 齐广海, 邱凯, 武书庚. 商品蛋鸡精准饲养技术研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(5): 1815-1823.

蛋鸡啄羽行为的影响因素与遗传调控基础研究进展

Research Progress on Influencing Factors and Genetic Architecture of Feather Pecking in Laying Hens

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 87

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价