奶牛分子系谱构建或亲权鉴定的微卫星标记筛选

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2017.04.002

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 595-604.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2017.04.002

奶牛分子系谱构建或亲权鉴定的微卫星标记筛选

殷彬¹, 岳书俭¹, 俞英², 曹巧巧¹, 王中华^1*, 师科荣^1*

1. 山东农业大学动物科技学院, 山东省动物生物工程与疾病防治重点实验室, 泰安 271018;
2. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 农业部畜禽遗传育种重点实验室, 畜禽育种国家工程实验室, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2016-09-29 出版日期:2017-04-23 发布日期:2017-04-23
通讯作者: 师科荣，副教授，E-mail：krshi@sdau.edu.cn；王中华，教授，E-mail：zhwang@sdau.edu.cn
作者简介:殷彬（1990-），男，山东滨州人，硕士，主要从事畜禽分子遗传育种的研究，E-mail：yinbin19900122@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31402054）；山东省自然科学基金（ZR2013CM013）；山东省农业良种工程项目（2016LZGC030）；国家现代奶业产业技术体系（CARS-37）；山东省泰山学者种业创新人才团队计划培养项目（2014LZ07-04）

Selection of Microsatellite Markers Used for Pedigree Tree Construction and/or Paternity Testing in Chinese Holstein Cows

YIN Bin¹, YUE Shu-jian¹, YU Ying², CAO Qiao-qiao¹, WANG Zhong-hua^1*, SHI Ke-rong^1*

1. Shandong Key Laboratory of Animal Bioengineering and Disease Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2016-09-29 Online:2017-04-23 Published:2017-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在利用较少的经过优化的遗传标记组合达到快速高效的亲缘鉴定，最终可有效应用于奶牛群体亲子鉴定与系谱构建。本研究从国际动物遗传学会（ISAG）数据库中初步选择了18个多态性较高的微卫星位点，经PCR优化验证获得可高效扩增的8个位点，并检测其在300头中国荷斯坦牛群体中的多态性分布。这些微卫星位点的亲子鉴定效力检测结果表明，8个标记平均等位基因数为14.63，平均多态性信息含量（PIC）为0.747，群体平均观察杂合度（Ho）为0.718，平均期望杂合度（He）为0.773。3种不同情形下进行亲子鉴定时8个位点的结合排除概率（CPE）均≥0.990。8对父子牛亲权鉴定结果表明，利用该8个标记可以识别并剔除系谱中的错误记录。结合排除概率的分析结果表明，当微卫星位点数增加至4个（TGLA227、TGLA122、BMC1207、BM103）时，3种不同情形下的CPE均≥0.949，可以满足个别案例牛亲子鉴定的要求。群体分子系谱构建的结果表明，当微卫星位点数大于或等于6个时，群体内近交系数和总群体近交系数均明显升高。因此，在生产实践中推荐使用TGLA227、TGLA122、BMC1207、BM103、INRA037、INRA134位点进行小规模群体（<200）的分子系谱构建或亲权鉴定。

Abstract:

How to use less and optimized genetic markers to achieve convenient and efficient parentage determination for cows was our research purpose, so as to effectively apply them into paternity test and pedigree construction. Eighteen microsatellite markers with high polymorphisms in cattle recommended on the web of ISAG were selected in this study, 8 markers that could be efficiently amplified were genotyped in 300 Chinese Holstein cows from the Jiabao Farm, based on fluorescent primer and automatic sequencing techniques. The results of paternity testing efficiency showed that the average of allele number, polymorphism information content (PIC), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 14.63, 0.747, 0.718 and 0.773, respectively. In 3 different conditions of known and/or unknown parent-offspring, their combined probabilities of exclusion (CPEs) were 0.990, 0.999 and 0.999, respectively. The results of paternity testing from 8 father-son showed that the 8 markers could successively be used to identify correct parentage and eliminate error records in the pedigree. Combined probability of exclusion analysis showed that when the number of microsatellite markers increased to 4 (TGLA227, TGLA122, BMC1207, BM103), all CPEs under 3 different situations were 0.949 or higher, which met the requirements of paternity tests in individual case. While, the results of molecular pedigree tree building at population level revealed that when the number of microsatellite sites increased to 6 (TGLA227, TGLA122, BMC1207, BM103, INRA037 and INRA134), inbreeding coefficient and total inbreeding coefficient within population were significantly increased, suggested that the 6 markers could efficiently be applied for pedigree tree construction and/or paternity testing for Chinese Holstein cows population(<200 individuals).

中图分类号:

S823
S813.1

殷彬, 岳书俭, 俞英, 曹巧巧, 王中华, 师科荣. 奶牛分子系谱构建或亲权鉴定的微卫星标记筛选[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(4): 595-604.

YIN Bin, YUE Shu-jian, YU Ying, CAO Qiao-qiao, WANG Zhong-hua, SHI Ke-rong. Selection of Microsatellite Markers Used for Pedigree Tree Construction and/or Paternity Testing in Chinese Holstein Cows[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2017, 48(4): 595-604.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2017.04.002

https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/Y2017/V48/I4/595

参考文献

[1] VISSCHER P M, WOOLLIAMS J A, SMITH D, et al. Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2002, 85(9):2368-2375.
[2] RON M, DOMOCHOVSKY R,GOLIK M, et al. Analysis of vaginal swabs for paternity testing and marker-assisted selection in cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86(5):1818-1820.
[3] WELLER J I, FELDMESSER E, GOLIK M, et al. Factors affecting incorrect paternity assignment in the Israeli Holstein population[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2004, 87(8):2627-2640.
[4] ISRAEL C, WELLER J I. Effect of misidentification on genetic gain and estimation of breeding value in dairy cattle populations[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83(1):181-187.
[5] BANOS G, WIGGANS G R, POWELL R L. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2001, 84(11):2523-2529.
[6] CERVINI M, HENRIQUE-SILVA F, MORTARI N, et al. Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bos indicus)[J]. Genet Mol Biol, 2006, 29(3):486-490.
[7] 钟美明. 利用15个微卫星位点对荷斯坦奶牛进行亲子鉴定[J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2010(4):5-8.
ZHONG M M. Paternity testing of Holstein cows using 15 microsatellite loci[J]. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2010(4):5-8.(in Chinese)
[8] TIAN F, SUN D X, ZHANG Y. Establishment of paternity testing system using microsatellite markers in Chinese Holstein[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2008, 35(5):279-284.
[9] 鲁玉霞. 应用微卫星DNA对Holstein奶牛进行亲子鉴定[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2008.
LU Y X. Applying microsatellites DNA to identify the paternity of Holstein[D]. Jinan:Shandong Normal University, 2008.(in Chinese)
[10] BUNTJER J B, OTSEN M, NIJMAN I J, et al. Phylogeny of bovine species based on AFLP fingerprinting[J]. Heredity, 2002, 88(1):46-51.
[11] KASHI Y, LIPKIN E, DARVASI A, et al. Parentage identification in the bovine using "deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprints"[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1990, 73(11):3306-3311.
[12] 周磊, 初芹, 刘林, 等. 利用微卫星和SNP标记信息进行奶牛亲子鉴定的模拟研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2011, 42(2):169-176.
ZHOU L, CHU Q, LIU L, et al. Simulation study on paternity identification in dairy cattle with microsatellite and SNP markers[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2011, 42(2):169-176.(in Chinese)
[13] 初芹, 张毅, 孙东晓, 等. 应用微卫星DNA标记分析荷斯坦母牛系谱可靠性及影响因素[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2011, 42(2):163-168.
CHU Q, ZHANG Y, SUN D X, et al. Pedigree verification of Holstein cows and analysis of factors affecting incorrect paternity based on microsatellite markers[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2011, 42(2):163-168.(in Chinese)
[14] 郭立平. 利用微卫星和SNP标记对西门塔尔牛进行亲子推断的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2013.
GUO L P. Study of parentage prediction of Simmental cattle using microsatellite and SNP markers[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.(in Chinese)
[15] 郭立平, 徐丽, 朱淼, 等. 西门塔尔牛微卫星亲子鉴定体系的优化[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(6):871-879.
GUO L P, XU L, ZHU M, et al. Optimization of microsatellite-based paternity testing system for Simmental[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2013, 44(6):871-879. (in Chinese)
[16] VAN TASSELL C P, ASHWELL M S, SONSTEGARD T S. Detection of putative loci affecting milk, health, and conformation traits in a US Holstein population using 105 microsatellite markers[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2000, 83(8):1865-1872.
[17] OZKAN E, SOYSAL M I, OZDER M, et al. Evaluation of parentage testing in the Turkish Holstein population based on 12 microsatellite loci[J]. Livest Sci, 2009, 124(1):101-106.
[18] 杨超, 张毅, 石万海,等. 中国荷斯坦种公牛亲子鉴定及个体识别信息库的建立[J]. 中国奶牛, 2011(16):1-5.
YANG C, ZHANG Y, SHI W H, et al. Establishment of a genotype database for genetic testing using microsatellites in Chinese Holstein bulls[J]. China Dairy Cattle. 2011(16):1-5. (in Chinese)

奶牛分子系谱构建或亲权鉴定的微卫星标记筛选

Selection of Microsatellite Markers Used for Pedigree Tree Construction and/or Paternity Testing in Chinese Holstein Cows

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹建华, 杨柏高, 张培培, 冯肖艺, 张航, 余洲, 牛一凡, 郝海生, 杜卫华, 朱化彬, 杨凌, 赵学明. 能量负平衡影响奶牛卵泡发育的机制[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 22-30.
[2]	苗舒, 安济山, 王祚, 肖定福, 兰欣怡, 刘磊, 沈维军, 万发春. 亮氨酸通过PI3K-AKT信号通路促进牛成肌细胞的增殖[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 142-152.
[3]	刘益丽, 唐娇, 闵奇, 杨露, 王泽宁, 胡莲, 赵迪, 江明锋. 基于转录组数据挖掘牦牛皱胃发育代谢的关键候选基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 153-168.
[4]	姚颖, 周应聪, 杜培岩, 李一娟, 钱文洁, 李柳杨, 余志鹏, 崔燕, 余四九, 樊江峰. 基于TMT技术的牦牛妊娠期血清蛋白质组学分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 192-206.
[5]	张颖, 袁莉刚, 陈国娟, 张芳, 杨大鹏. ET-1/eNOS表达差异在牦牛隐睾发生中的作用分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 207-217.
[6]	张文涛, 刘晨阳, 朱炳霖, 柳丽, 田媛, 姚宇航, 成功. Snail1对牛脂肪细胞增殖分化影响及作用机制的研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(12): 5008-5019.
[7]	牛一凡, 杨柏高, 张培培, 张航, 冯肖艺, 曹建华, 余洲, 郝海生, 杜卫华, 邹惠影, 朱化彬, 马友记, 赵学明. 牛胚胎基因组选择研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(11): 4449-4457.
[8]	王文翔, 杜丽丽, 胡俊伟, 张琰翔, 马铭昊, 段蕊, 钱聪, 王欣玥, 李三禄, 张长庆, 张路培, 高雪, 徐凌洋, 李俊雅, 高会江. 基于转录组分析挖掘平凉红牛背最长肌肉质性状候选基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(11): 4589-4604.
[9]	张倩, 崔燕, 余四九, 何俊峰, 潘阳阳, 王萌. 初生及成年牦牛大脑皮质的转录组分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(11): 4605-4614.
[10]	董智豪, 时玉新, 郭冠华, 原开敏, 修豪宇, 汪超, 白俊艳, 王栋. 母牛不同发情阶段唾液化合物的比较分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(11): 4636-4652.
[11]	孙东晓, 张胜利, 张勤, 李姣, 张桂香, 刘丑生, 郑伟杰. 我国奶牛基因组选择技术应用进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4028-4039.
[12]	冯肖艺, 郝海生, 杜卫华, 朱化彬, 崔凯, 赵学明. 能量负平衡导致奶牛繁殖力下降的机制进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4050-4060.
[13]	马浩然, 张路培, 金生云, 宝金山, 李红艳, 高会江, 徐凌洋, 王泽昭, 李俊雅. 利用高密度SNP芯片评估中国地方肉牛品种基因组亲缘关系[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4174-4185.
[14]	郭逸芯, 王之盛, 胡瑞, 王俊梅, 王森, 施丽媛, 张晓红, 邹华围, 左家学, 彭全辉, 薛白, 王立志. 亮氨酸对黄牛皮下脂肪细胞棕色化的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3286-3298.
[15]	褚楚, 张静静, 丁磊, 樊懿楷, 包向男, 向世馨, 刘锐, 罗雪路, 任小丽, 李春芳, 刘文举, 王亮, 刘莉, 李永青, 江汉, 李委奇, 孙伟, 李喜和, 温万, 周佳敏, 张淑君. 基于中红外光谱的牛奶中三种氨基酸含量预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3299-3312.