畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 2424-2437.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2025.05.039
朱秋祥(), 胡雨林(
), 朱鑫超, 钟永澄, 丁晓晴, 冀锦朝, 王京煜, 贾坤, 张海洋*(
), 李守军*(
)
收稿日期:
2024-05-29
出版日期:
2025-05-23
发布日期:
2025-05-27
通讯作者:
张海洋,李守军
E-mail:vet_zhuqiuxiang@163.com;huyulin2023@163.com;zhanghaiyang0429@163.com;shoujunli@scau.edu.cn
作者简介:
朱秋祥(1999-),男,四川德阳人,硕士生,主要从事动物应激相关研究,E-mail:vet_zhuqiuxiang@163.com朱秋祥和胡雨林为同等贡献作者
基金资助:
ZHU Qiuxiang(), HU Yulin(
), ZHU Xinchao, ZHONG Yongcheng, DING Xiaoqing, JI Jinzhao, WANG Jingyu, JIA Kun, ZHANG Haiyang*(
), LI Shoujun*(
)
Received:
2024-05-29
Online:
2025-05-23
Published:
2025-05-27
Contact:
ZHANG Haiyang, LI Shoujun
E-mail:vet_zhuqiuxiang@163.com;huyulin2023@163.com;zhanghaiyang0429@163.com;shoujunli@scau.edu.cn
摘要:
本研究旨在完善猫急性应激(cat acute stress, CAS)诊断标准,并将该标准应用于临床试验,以评价加巴喷丁片预防CAS的有效性和安全性。使用猫应激评分(cat stress score, CSS)法诊断CAS,在临床收集健康猫和急性应激猫各15只,分别纳入健康组和急性应激组。通过临床资料对比、CSS评估、促肾上腺激素释放激素(corticotropin releasing hormone, CRH)、促肾上腺激素(adrenocorticotropic hormone, ACTH)和肾上腺素(epinephrine, EPI)检测,评价3种激素的诊断价值并完善CAS诊断标准。再使用完善后的CAS诊断标准,在临床收集106只急性应激猫,随机平均分为赋形剂组和加巴喷丁组,共进行3次就诊。第2次就诊前1.5 h,两组试验猫需分别口服推荐剂量的赋形剂片和加巴喷丁片。通过临床资料对比、基础生理指标检查、行为学评估、血常规检查、血生化检查、激素检查和不良反应监测,评价加巴喷丁片预防CAS的有效性和安全性。结果表明,健康组和急性应激组临床资料具备同质性;CRH、ACTH和EPI联合诊断CAS的最佳临界值为0.212,曲线下面积为0.973,灵敏度为100.00%,特异度为86.67%。药物临床试验中,赋形剂组和加巴喷丁组临床资料具备同质性;与赋形剂组相比,加巴喷丁组的CSS差值、体温差值、呼吸频率差值、心率差值、ACTH差值、EPI差值和不良反应发生率(无力、共济失调、嗜睡)显著升高,而整体镇静评分差值显著降低;上述不良反应约发生在用药2~3 h后,持续时间为1.5~3.0 h;加巴喷丁片未导致血常规和血生化指标的改变。综上,本研究建议CAS的诊断标准完善为猫在检测前数小时内受到应激源刺激,检测时血清CRH(pg·mL-1)、ACTH(pg·mL-1)和EPI(ng·mL-1)浓度联合诊断的预测概率值>0.212,且检测时CSS>3分。在应激事件前1.5 h以推荐剂量单次口服加巴喷丁片,对CAS有一定预防作用,但可能出现无力、共济失调和嗜睡的不良反应。
中图分类号:
朱秋祥, 胡雨林, 朱鑫超, 钟永澄, 丁晓晴, 冀锦朝, 王京煜, 贾坤, 张海洋, 李守军. 猫急性应激诊断标准的完善及其在加巴喷丁片临床试验中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(5): 2424-2437.
ZHU Qiuxiang, HU Yulin, ZHU Xinchao, ZHONG Yongcheng, DING Xiaoqing, JI Jinzhao, WANG Jingyu, JIA Kun, ZHANG Haiyang, LI Shoujun. Refinement of the Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Stress in Cats and Its Application in Clinical Trials of Gabapentin Tablets[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2025, 56(5): 2424-2437.
表 1
GSS评分表"
得分/分 Score (point) | 具体表现 Presentation |
-3 | 非常易激动(过度活跃;不断移动;间歇或持续发声;安静环境下活跃) |
-2 | 有点易激动(易激动;站立并可能间歇性移动;有或没有间歇性发声;对环境保持警惕;活动水平随着环境的变化而增加;最初易兴奋,但在安静的环境中稳定下来) |
-1 | 轻微的兴奋[轻微兴奋;坐着或站着;有或没有间歇性发声;活动水平随着环境的变化(如遮盖物的移动)而增加;在安静的环境平静] |
0 | 正常(警觉、反应灵敏;胸骨横卧或坐着或站着;不发声;意识到环境的变化,随之增加或不增加活动水平;容易在安静的环境中保持平静) |
1 | 轻微镇静(安静、警觉、反应灵敏;胸骨横卧或坐着;无发声;对环境的变化导致活动水平增加量最少;在安静环境中立即平静) |
2 | 有点镇静(态度平静;胸骨横卧;不发声;对环境的变化有或无意识;环境变化后,活动水平并无变化;在安静环境中立即平静) |
3 | 非常镇静(迟钝;胸骨或侧卧;无发声;除听觉刺激外,对环境变化无意识且无反应;对遮盖物的移动无反应) |
表 2
临床资料表"
组别 Groups | 健康组 The healthy group | 急性应激组 The acute stress group | P值 P value | |
年龄/月Age (month) | 27 (24, 36) | 24 (19, 27) | 0.106 | |
体重/kg Weight | 3.6 (2.8, 4.0) | 3.1 (2.5, 3.5) | 0.233 | |
性别(雄/雌,例)Sex (male/female) | 8/7 | 10/5 | 0.710 | |
品种/% Breed | 英国短毛猫British shorthair | 8 | 7 | 1.000 |
美国短毛猫American shorthair | 4 | 5 | ||
其他品种Others breeds | 3 | 3 |
表 4
血清CRH、ACTH和EPI水平对CAS的诊断价值"
指标Indexes | CRH | ACTH | EPI | 联合诊断Combined diagnosis |
曲线下面积AUC | 0.596 | 0.836 | 0.569 | 0.973 |
95%置信区间95% CI | 0.375~0.816 | 0.693~0.978 | 0.359~0.779 | 0.926~1.000 |
截断值Cutoff value | 48.88 pg·mL-1 | 47.54 pg·mL-1 | 10.13 ng·mL-1 | 0.212 |
灵敏度/% Sensitivity | 46.67 | 60.00 | 60.00 | 100.00 |
特异度/% Specificity | 93.33 | 93.33 | 66.67 | 86.67 |
约登指数Youden index | 0.400 | 0.533 | 0.267 | 0.867 |
P值P value | 0.373 | 0.002 | 0.520 | <0.001 |
表 5
临床资料表"
组别 Groups | 赋形剂组 The vehicle group | 加巴喷丁组 The gabapentin group | P值 P value | |
年龄/月Age (month) | 24.0 (22.0, 28.5) | 24.0 (19.0, 35.5) | 0.992 | |
体重/kg Weight | 3.1 (2.5, 3.5) | 3.3 (2.8, 3.6) | 0.144 | |
性别(雄/雌,例)Sex (male/female) | 21/32 | 29/24 | 0.120 | |
品种/% Breed | 英国短毛猫British shorthair | 33 (62.3) | 28 (52.8) | 0.395 |
中华田园猫Domestic cat | 9 (17.0) | 14 (26.4) | ||
美国短毛猫American shorthair | 5 (9.4) | 8 (15.1) | ||
其他品种Others breeds | 6 (11.3) | 3 (5.7) |
表 6
赋形剂组用药前后血常规分析表"
项目 Items | 参考范围 Normal range | 检测值Detection value | P值 P value | |
Day 1 | Day 9 | |||
白细胞/(109·L-1) WBC | 5.50~19.50 | 16.17±6.25 | 16.32±6.20 | 0.826 |
中性粒细胞/(109·L-1) NEU | 3.12~12.58 | 10.23 (6.97, 15.60) | 10.54 (6.84, 13.82) | 0.965 |
淋巴细胞/(109·L-1) LYM | 0.73~7.86 | 3.34 (2.68, 4.20) | 3.44 (2.68, 4.59) | 0.626 |
嗜酸性粒细胞/(109·L-1) EOS | 0.06~1.93 | 0.74 (0.50, 1.08) | 0.83 (0.52, 1.24) | 0.392 |
红细胞/(1012·L-1) RBC | 4.60~10.20 | 8.01±1.49 | 7.85±1.60 | 0.356 |
血红蛋白/(g·L-1) HGB | 85.00~153.00 | 113.08±20.10 | 111.55±22.17 | 0.510 |
红细胞压积/% HCT | 26.00~47.00 | 31.57±5.27 | 30.87±6.05 | 0.303 |
血小板/(109·L-1) PLT | 100.00~518.00 | 201.00 (119.00, 311.50) | 181.00 (86.00, 315.50) | 0.286 |
表 7
加巴喷丁组用药前后血常规分析表"
项目 Items | 参考范围 Normal range | 检测值Detection value | P值 P value | |
Day 1 | Day 9 | |||
白细胞/(109·L-1) WBC | 5.50~19.50 | 14.54 (10.93, 20.01) | 15.37 (9.96, 19.53) | 0.979 |
中性粒细胞/(109·L-1) NEU | 3.12~12.58 | 9.85 (6.51, 13.52) | 9.66 (6.02, 13.58) | 0.828 |
淋巴细胞/(109·L-1) LYM | 0.73~7.86 | 4.66 (3.23, 5.83) | 3.95 (3.01, 5.65) | 0.276 |
嗜酸性粒细胞/(109·L-1) EOS | 0.06~1.93 | 0.80 (0.48, 1.25) | 0.75 (0.49, 1.27) | 0.366 |
红细胞/(1012·L-1) RBC | 4.60~10.20 | 8.85±1.51 | 8.29±1.17## | 0.002 |
血红蛋白/(g·L-1) HGB | 85.00~153.00 | 132.00 (118.00, 140.00) | 120.00 (107.50, 135.50)## | 0.000 |
红细胞压积/% HCT | 26.00~47.00 | 36.60 (31.95, 38.95) | 33.50 (29.10, 37.25)## | 0.000 |
血小板/(109·L-1) PLT | 100.00~518.00 | 208.00 (146.50, 303.00) | 178.00 (107.50, 303.50) | 0.181 |
表 8
赋形剂组用药前后血生化分析表"
项目 Items | 参考范围 Normal range | 检测值Detection value | P值 P value | |
Day 1 | Day 9 | |||
丙氨酸转氨酶/(U·L-1) ALT | 22.00~84.00 | 59.10 (46.45, 76.00) | 56.40 (46.80, 73.05) | 0.975 |
天门冬氨酸转氨酶/(U·L-1) AST | 18.00~51.00 | 23.70 (18.60, 31.45) | 22.00 (19.00, 27.75) | 0.236 |
碱性磷酸酶/(U·L-1) ALP | 23.00~118.00 | 29.10 (19.55, 43.75) | 31.80 (25.00, 45.25)** | 0.006 |
总蛋白/(g·L-1) TP | 57.00~78.00 | 78.01±5.75 | 74.81±8.18** | 0.002 |
白蛋白/(g·L-1) ALB | 23.00~35.00 | 26.88±4.31 | 26.02±3.85* | 0.021 |
淀粉酶/(U·L-1) AMY | 300.00~1100.00 | 1 446.10 (1 239.00, 1 822.35) | 1 340.10 (1 116.50, 1 606.40)** | 0.000 |
肌酐/(μmol·L-1) CRE | 71.00~159.00 | 96.50 (79.00, 126.80) | 91.60 (78.40, 107.15) | 0.390 |
尿素氮/(mmol·L-1) BUN | 6.28~11.70 | 8.31 (6.93, 10.10) | 7.59 (6.60, 9.34)** | 0.002 |
表 9
加巴喷丁组用药前后血生化分析表"
项目 Items | 参考范围 Normal range | 检测值Detection value | P值 P value | |
Day 1 | Day 9 | |||
丙氨酸转氨酶/(U·L-1) ALT | 22.00~84.00 | 58.40 (43.75, 80.70) | 53.80 (44.20, 84.05) | 0.856 |
天门冬氨酸转氨酶/(U·L-1) AST | 18.00~51.00 | 23.80 (18.60, 31.15) | 21.00 (17.20, 26.85)# | 0.033 |
碱性磷酸酶/(U·L-1) ALP | 23.00~118.00 | 35.90 (26.05, 50.75) | 37.20 (25.75, 49.10) | 0.547 |
总蛋白/(g·L-1) TP | 57.00~78.00 | 77.78±8.86 | 76.02±9.58 | 0.082 |
白蛋白/(g·L-1) ALB | 23.00~35.00 | 28.05±3.98 | 28.09±4.52 | 0.958 |
淀粉酶/(U·L-1) AMY | 300.00~1 100.00 | 1 809.50 (1 306.90, 2 372.60) | 1 435.60 (1 171.30, 2 351.20)## | 0.003 |
肌酐/(μmol·L-1) CRE | 71.00~159.00 | 106.70 (86.45, 128.25) | 104.30 (87.90, 127.15) | 0.863 |
尿素氮/(mmol·L-1) BUN | 6.28~11.70 | 9.12±2.29 | 8.16±1.87## | 0.001 |
表 10
不良反应分析表"
不良反应类型 Type of adverse reaction | 赋形剂组 The vehicle group | 加巴喷丁组 The gabapentin group | χ2检验P值 The P values of χ2 test |
无力Atony | 1 (1.9%) | 11 (20.8%)** | 0.002 |
共济失调Ataxia | 1 (1.9%) | 8 (15.1%)* | 0.031 |
嗜睡Somnolence | 0 (0) | 6 (11.3%)* | 0.027 |
发声增加Increased vocalization | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
食欲不佳Poor appetite | 0 (0) | 1 (1.9%) | 1.000 |
过度进食Overeating | 0 (0) | 1 (1.9%) | 1.000 |
1 | DORLAND N W . Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary[M]. aaa: Saunders/Elsevier Health Sciences Division, 1985: 1259. |
2 |
DHABHAR F S , MCEWEN B S . Acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses cell-mediated immunity in vivo: a potential role for leukocyte trafficking[J]. Brain Behav Immun, 1997, 11 (4): 286- 306.
doi: 10.1006/brbi.1997.0508 |
3 |
ELLIS J J , STRYHN H , COCKRAM M S . Effects of the provision of a hiding box or shelf on the behaviour and faecal glucocorticoid metabolites of bold and shy cats housed in single cages[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2021, 236, 105221.
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105221 |
4 |
KESSLER M R , TURNER D C . Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis Silvestris Catus) housed singly, in Pairs and in groups in boarding catteries[J]. Anim Welfare, 1997, 6 (3): 243- 254.
doi: 10.1017/S0962728600019837 |
5 |
KESSLER M R , TURNER D C . Effects of density and cage size on stress in domestic cats (Felis Silvestris Catus) housed in animal shelters and boarding catteries[J]. Anim Welfare, 1999, 8 (3): 259- 267.
doi: 10.1017/S0962728600021746 |
6 | 张海洋, 朱秋祥, 高志诚, 等. 猫急性应激模型的建立及诊断标志物的筛选[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54 (3): 1249- 1260. |
ZHANG H Y , ZHU Q X , GAO Z C , et al. Establishment of acute stress model and screening of diagnostic markers in cats[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54 (3): 1249- 1260. | |
7 |
PANKRATZ K E , FERRIS K K , GRIFFITH E H , et al. Use of single-dose oral gabapentin to attenuate fear responses in cage-trap confined community cats: a double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial[J]. J Feline Med Surg, 2018, 20 (6): 535- 543.
doi: 10.1177/1098612X17719399 |
8 | DI CESARE F , NEGRO V , RAVASIO G , et al. Gabapentin: clinical use and pharmacokinetics in dogs, cats, and horses[J]. Animals (Basel), 2023, 13 (12): 2045- 2062. |
9 |
VAN HAAFTEN K A , FORSYTHE L R E , STELOW E A , et al. Effects of a single preappointment dose of gabapentin on signs of stress in cats during transportation and veterinary examination[J]. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 2017, 251 (10): 1175- 1181.
doi: 10.2460/javma.251.10.1175 |
10 |
CHARMANDARI E , TSIGOS C , CHROUSOS G . Endocrinology of the stress response[J]. Annu Rev Physiol, 2005, 67, 259- 284.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.120816 |
11 |
HABIB K E , GOLD P W , CHROUSOS G P . Neuroendocrinology of stress[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2001, 30 (3): 695- 728.
doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70208-5 |
12 | 柯舸, 肖勇, 张弛, 等. 肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血伴心肌损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024, 46 (3): 271- 276. |
KE G , XIAO Y , ZHANG C , et al. Risk factors for myocardial injury in esophagogastric variceal bleeding patients with cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46 (3): 271- 276. | |
13 |
SMITH S M , VALE W W . The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress[J]. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2006, 8 (4): 383- 395.
doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/ssmith |
14 |
KVETNANSKY R , SABBAN E L , PALKOVITS M . Catecholaminergic systems in stress: structural and molecular genetic approaches[J]. Physiol Rev, 2009, 89 (2): 535- 606.
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2006 |
15 |
ROMANA-SOUZA B , OTRANTO M , VIEIRA A M , et al. Rotational stress-induced increase in epinephrine levels delays cutaneous wound healing in mice[J]. Brain Behav Immun, 2010, 24 (3): 427- 437.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.012 |
16 |
SANCHEZ A , TOLEDO-PINTO E A , MENEZES M L , et al. Changes in norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations in adrenal gland of the rats submitted to acute immobilization stress[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2003, 48 (6): 607- 613.
doi: 10.1016/S1043-6618(03)00241-X |
17 |
WONG D L , TAI T C , WONG-FAULL D C , et al. Epinephrine: a short- and long-term regulator of stress and development of illness: a potential new role for epinephrine in stress[J]. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 2012, 32 (5): 737- 748.
doi: 10.1007/s10571-011-9768-0 |
18 | KAMOHARA H , KAMOHARA T , HIKASA Y . A randomized clinical trial on effects of alfaxalone combined with medetomidine and midazolam in preventing stress-related neurohormonal and metabolic responses of isoflurane-anesthetized cats undergoing surgery[J]. Am J Vet Res, 2022, 83 (11): 1- 10. |
19 | 曹永孝. 药物代谢动力学经典模型的局限与改进[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 40 (5): 669- 673. |
CAO Y X . Limitations and improvements of classical models of pharmacokinetics[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Medical Sciences), 2019, 40 (5): 669- 673. | |
20 |
ADRIAN D , PAPICH M G , BAYNES R , et al. The pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in cats[J]. J Vet Int Med, 2018, 32 (6): 1996- 2002.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15313 |
21 |
QUIMBY J M , LORBACH S K , SAFFIRE A , et al. Serum concentrations of gabapentin in cats with chronic kidney disease[J]. J Feline Med Surg, 2022, 24 (12): 1260- 1266.
doi: 10.1177/1098612X221077017 |
22 |
KUKANICH B , COHEN R L . Pharmacokinetics of oral gabapentin in greyhound dogs[J]. Vet J, 2011, 187 (1): 133- 135.
doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.09.022 |
23 |
MILLS P O , TANSEY C O , GENZER S C , et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of gabapentin after oral and subcutaneous administration in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus)[J]. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci, 2020, 59 (3): 305- 309.
doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000150 |
24 |
CROWE Y C , GROTH A D , BILLSON F M , et al. Gabapentin reduces stress and does not affect ocular parameters in clinically normal cats[J]. Vet Ophthalmol, 2022, 25 (6): 493- 498.
doi: 10.1111/vop.13018 |
25 |
EAGAN B H , VAN HAAFTEN K , PROTOPOPOVA A . Daily gabapentin improved behavior modification progress and decreased stress in shelter cats from hoarding environments in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 2023, 261 (9): 1305- 1315.
doi: 10.2460/javma.23.01.0044 |
26 |
MCCARTY R . Learning about stress: neural, endocrine and behavioral adaptations[J]. Stress, 2016, 19 (5): 449- 475.
doi: 10.1080/10253890.2016.1192120 |
27 | MATHIESON S , LIN C C , UNDERWOOD M , et al. Pregabalin and gabapentin for pain[J]. BMJ, 2020, 369, m1315. |
28 | 魏春华, 温明春, 王先芳, 等. 3611例哮喘患者血浆皮质醇水平及相关因素的回顾性分析[C]//中华医学会呼吸病学年会——2011(第十二次全国呼吸病学学术会议). 广州, 2011: 509. |
WEI C H, WEN M C, WANG X F, et al. Retrospective analysis of plasma cortisol levels and related factors in 3611 patients with asthma[C]//Annual Meeting of Respiratory Disease of Chinese Medical Association-2011 (The 12th National Respiratory Disease Conference). Guangzhou, 2011: 509. (in Chinese) | |
29 | 衣家奇. 双期增强扫描联合血清皮质醇对肾上腺乏脂性腺瘤及嗜铬细胞瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2023, 22 (1): 96- 97. |
YI J Q . The diagnostic value of dual-phase enhanced scan combined with serum cortisol in lipid-poor adrenal adenoma and pheochromocytoma[J]. Health Engineering in China, 2023, 22 (1): 96- 97. | |
30 |
MIGEON M . Is gabapentin a safe and effective treatment for nonneuropathic pain?[J]. JAAPA, 2021, 34 (12): 54- 56.
doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000794984.26635.42 |
31 |
RUSSO M , GRAHAM B , SANTARELLI D M . Gabapentin-friend or foe?[J]. Pain Pract, 2023, 23 (1): 63- 69.
doi: 10.1111/papr.13165 |
32 |
MESSENGER K M , HOPFENSPERGER M , KNYCH H K , et al. Pharmacokinetics of detomidine following intravenous or oral-transmucosal administration and sedative effects of the oral-transmucosal treatment in dogs[J]. Am J Vet Res, 2016, 77 (4): 413- 420.
doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.4.413 |
33 |
ALLEN M E , LEBLANC N L , SCOLLAN K F . Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and sedative effects of oral gabapentin in healthy cats[J]. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 2021, 57 (6): 278- 284.
doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7081 |
34 | PINTO FILHO W A , SILVEIRA L H J , VALE M L , et al. Gabapentin in improvement of procedural sedation and analgesia in oncologic pediatric patients: a clinical trial[J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2019, 9 (5): e91197. |
35 | 彭桂芳. 加巴喷丁的临床应用进展[J]. 中外医疗, 2021, 40 (10): 191- 194. |
PENG G F . Progress in clinical application of gabapentin[J]. China Foreign Medical Treatment, 2021, 40 (10): 191- 194. | |
36 | WIFFEN P J , DERRY S , BELL R F , et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 6 (6): CD007938. |
37 |
CAI K , NANGA R P , LAMPROU L , et al. The impact of gabapentin administration on brain GABA and glutamate concentrations: a 7T (1)H-MRS study[J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2012, 37 (13): 2764- 2771.
doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.142 |
38 |
QU W M , YUE X F , SUN Y , et al. Honokiol promotes non-rapid eye movement sleep via the benzodiazepine site of the GABA(A) receptor in mice[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2012, 167 (3): 587- 598.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02010.x |
39 |
STRUYK A , GARGANO C , DREXEL M , et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of suvorexant and zolpidem on EEG during sleep in healthy subjects[J]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2016, 26 (10): 1649- 1656.
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.07.002 |
[1] | 姜林, 张耀辉, 黎静, 张晓晶. 影像学技术在犬猫常见心脏疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(5): 2103-2111. |
[2] | 卢娜, 高钰, 赵嘉伟, 苏迪, 陈家磊, 罗忠礼. 猫传染性腹膜炎病毒mRNA疫苗转录载体的构建与鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2025, 56(2): 803-813. |
[3] | 郑焕琴, 姜晓敏, 岳红, 王宝岩, 刘洋, 张兴晓, 张建龙, 朱洪伟. 猫1型疱疹病毒分离鉴定及部分生物学特性分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(7): 3040-3048. |
[4] | 孙凡媛, 刘怡婷, 郭昕怡, 陈建材, 周华波, 覃一峰, 欧阳康, 韦祖樟, 黄伟坚, 陈樱. 猫上呼吸道疾病的病原、诊断与防治[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2345-2356. |
[5] | 周宁, 汤承, 许佳, 岳华, 陈曦. 猫泛白细胞减少症病毒A91S变异株对猫的致病性及基因组特征研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(6): 2560-2568. |
[6] | 罗晓琴, 郭志廷, 王贺, 张景艳, 张康, 王磊, 马永华, 李建喜. 常山口服液治疗鸡球虫病的效果分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1747-1755. |
[7] | 李春晓, 安尉, 高博泉, 王振龙, 韩冰, 陶慧, 王金全, 王秀敏. 猫犬主要过敏原蛋白的最新研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(2): 471-480. |
[8] | 张泽宇, 董宁宁, 谈晓梅, 李传锋, 朱杰, 刘光清, 张伟, 孟春春. 猫杯状病毒VP1蛋白的单克隆抗体制备及抗原表位鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(12): 5784-5791. |
[9] | 康博, 郭瑞泽, 张迪. 计算机断层扫描淋巴管造影技术在猫乳糜胸诊疗中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(11): 4890-4899. |
[10] | 刘福康, 袁莉刚, 张达, 汤傲星, 刘光清, 朱杰. 猫传染性腹膜炎病毒N蛋白表达及其多克隆抗体制备[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(10): 4773-4778. |
[11] | 范小雨, 米洁, 刘佳琦, 菅玉双, 李四豪, 范云鹏, 刘迎秋, 宋晓平, 张为民, 麻武仁. 回阳九针术对母猫绝育术后苏醒监测指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 365-372. |
[12] | 王莹, 李佳康, 曾悦, 史开拓, 韦丽婷, 彭佳佳, 李秋燕, 曹龙龙, 周登元. 猫杯状病毒单克隆抗体的制备[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 401-405. |
[13] | 眭玉珍, 陈桂珍, 左守军, 汪海东, 宋鹏涛, 栗亮亮, 张龙现, 董海聚, 刘芳. 河南省宠物猫华支睾吸虫和其他肠道寄生虫感染状况分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 3022-3030. |
[14] | 胥辉豪, 冯雪倩, 朴雪玲, 慎晓军, 郑小波, 杨恒, 林珈好, 金艺鹏, 林德贵. 猫角膜缘干细胞不同采集、分离与培养鉴定方法的对比研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 3091-3101. |
[15] | 李昭燕, 高江, 郭时惠, 赵茹茜, 马文强. 猫过敏原检测方法与控制措施的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2272-2279. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||