[1] ZIMMERMAN J J, KARRIKER L A, RAMIREZ A, 等. 猪病学[M]. 10版. 赵德明, 张仲秋, 周向梅, 等译. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2014.
ZIMMERMAN J J, KARRIKER L A, RAMIREZ A, et al. Diseases of swine[M]. 10th ed. ZHAO D M, ZHANG Z Q, ZHOU X M, et al, trans. Beijing:China Agricultural University Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
[2] CHEONG Y, OH C, LEE K, et al. Survey of porcine respiratory disease complex-associated pathogens among commercial pig farms in Korea via oral fluid method[J]. J Vet Sci, 2017, 18(3):283-289.
[3] LIU H S, XUE Q, ZENG Q Y, et al. Haemophilus parasuis vaccines[J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2016, 180:53-58.
[4] BLANCO I, CANALS A, EVANS G, et al. Differences in susceptibility to Haemophilus parasuis infection in pigs[J]. Can J Vet Res, 2008, 72(3):228-235.
[5] 陈洪波. 副猪嗜血杆菌感染:宿主免疫应答模型与巨噬细胞活化[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2015, 46(1):1-11.
CHEN H B. Haemophilus parasuis infection:model for the host immune response and the macrophage activation[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2015, 46(1):1-11. (in Chinese)
[6] COSTA-HURTADO M, OLVERA A, MARTINEZ-MOLINER V, et al. Changes in macrophage phenotype after infection of pigs with Haemophilus parasuis strains with different levels of virulence[J]. Infect Immun, 2013, 81(7):2327-2333.
[7] MULLINS M A, REGISTER K B, BAYLES D O, et al. Haemophilus parasuis exhibits IgA protease activity but lacks homologs of the IgA protease genes of Haemophilus influenzae[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2011, 153(3-4):407-412.
[8] VAHLE J L, HAYNES J S, ANDREWS J J. Experimental reproduction of Haemophilus parasuis infection in swine:clinical, bacteriologic, and morphologic findings[J]. J Vet Diagn Invest, 1995, 7(4):476-480.
[9] OLVERA A, BALLESTER M, NOFRARÍAS M, et al. Differences in phagocytosis susceptibility in Haemophilus parasuis strains[J]. Vet Res, 2009, 40(3):24.
[10] COSTA-HURTADO M, BALLESTER M, GALOFRÉ-MILÀ N, et al. VtaA8 and VtaA9 from Haemophilus parasuis delay phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages[J]. Vet Res, 2012, 43(1):57.
[11] CHEN H B, LI C C, FANG M D, et al. Understanding Haemophilus parasuis infection in porcine spleen through a transcriptomics approach[J]. BMC Genomics, 2009, 10:64.
[12] 陈洪波, 程蕾, 向敏, 等. 副猪嗜血杆菌感染禁食初乳仔猪实验动物模型的构建[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2015, 36(6):53-62.
CHEN H B, CHENG L, XIANG M, et al. Establishment of experimental model for colostrum-deprived piglets infected by Haemophilus parasuis[J]. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2015, 36(6):53-62. (in Chinese)
[13] WANG Y, LIU C, FANG Y, et al. Transcription analysis on response of porcine alveolar macrophages to Haemophilus parasuis[J]. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13:68.
[14] WILKINSON J M, SARGENT C A, GALINA-PANTOJA L, et al. Gene expression profiling in the lungs of pigs with different susceptibilities to Glässer's disease[J]. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11:455.
[15] CHEN H B, LUNNEY J K, CHENG L, et al. Porcine S100A8 and S100A9:molecular characterizations and crucial functions in response to Haemophilus parasuis infection[J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2011, 35(4):490-500.
[16] ZHOU S M, XU C G, ZHANG B, et al. Natural IgG antibodies in normal rabbit serum are involved in killing of the ompP2 mutant of Haemophilus parasuis SC096 strain via the classical complement pathway[J]. Vet J, 2013, 196(1):111-113.
[17] CELLI J, FINLAY B B. Bacterial avoidance of phagocytosis[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2002, 10(5):232-237.
[18] CERDÀ-CUÉLLAR M, ARAGON V. Serum-resistance in Haemophilus parasuis is associated with systemic disease in swine[J]. Vet J, 2008, 175(3):384-389.
[19] ROSENBERGER C M, FINLAY B B. Phagocyte sabotage:disruption of macrophage signalling by bacterial pathogens[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2003, 4(5):385-396.
[20] KAVANOVÁ L, PRODěLALOVÁ J, NEDBALCOVÁ K, et al. Immune response of porcine alveolar macrophages to a concurrent infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Haemophilus parasuis in vitro[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2015, 180(1-2):28-35.
[21] BELLO-ORTI B, COSTA-HURTADO M, MARTINEZ-MOLINER V, et al. Time course Haemophilus parasuis infection reveals pathological differences between virulent and non-virulent strains in the respiratory tract[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2014, 170(3-4):430-437.
[22] SINGLETON H, GRAHAM S P, BODMAN-SMITH K B, et al. Establishing porcine monocyte-derived macrophage and dendritic cell systems for studying the interaction with PRRSV-1[J]. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7:832.
[23] ZHOU S M, HE X H, XU C G, et al. The outer membrane protein P2(OmpP2) of Haemophilus parasuis induces proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in porcine alveolar macrophages[J]. Vet J, 2014, 199(3):461-464.
[24] SAHA B, KODYS K, SZABO G. Hepatitis C virus-induced monocyte differentiation into polarized M2 macrophages promotes stellate cell activation via TGF-β[J]. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 2(3):302-316.e8.
[25] FABRIEK B O, VAN BRUGGEN R, DENG D M, et al. The macrophage scavenger receptor CD163 functions as an innate immune sensor for bacteria[J]. Blood, 2009, 113(4):887-892.
[26] MØLLER H J. Soluble CD163[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2012, 72(1):1-13.
[27] MARTÍNEZ-MARTÍNEZ S, FRANDOLOSO R, RODRÍGUEZ-FERRI E F, et al. A vaccine based on a mutant transferrin binding protein B of Haemophilus parasuis induces a strong T-helper 2 response and bacterial clearance after experimental infection[J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2016, 179:18-25.
[28] FRANDOLOSO R, MARTÍNEZ-MARTÍNEZ S, CALMETTES C, et al. Nonbinding site-directed mutants of transferrin binding protein B exhibit enhanced immunogenicity and protective capabilities[J]. Infect Immun, 2015, 83(3):1030-1038.
[29] FRANDOLOSO R, MARTÍNEZ-MARTÍNEZ S, YUBERO S, et al. New insights in cellular immune response in colostrum-deprived pigs after immunization with subunit and commercial vaccines against Glässer's disease[J]. Cell Immunol, 2012, 277(1-2):74-82.
[30] MARTÍNEZ-MARTÍNEZ S, RODRÍGUEZ-FERRI E F, FRANDOLOSO R, et al. Molecular analysis of lungs from pigs immunized with a mutant transferrin binding protein B-based vaccine and challenged with Haemophilus parasuis[J]. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 2016, 48:69-78.
[31] TIMMERMANN M, BUCK F, SORG C, et al. Interaction of soluble CD163 with activated T lymphocytes involves its association with non-muscle myosin heavy chain type A[J]. Immunol Cell Biol, 2004, 82(5):479-487.
[32] WILLIAMS A R, FRYGANAS C, REICHWALD K, et al. Polymerization-dependent activation of porcine γδ T-cells by proanthocyanidins[J]. Res Vet Sci, 2016, 105:209-215.
[33] ISHIGAMI M, NISHIMURA H, YOSHIOKA K, et al. The role of intrahepatic γδ-T cells for liver injury induced by Salmonella infection in mouse[J]. Microbiol Immunol, 1999, 43(5):461-469.
[34] TAKAMATSU H H, DENYER M S, STIRLING C, et al. Porcine γδ T cells:possible roles on the innate and adaptive immune responses following virus infection[J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2006, 112(1-2):49-61.
[35] STENFELDT C, PACHECO J M, BORCA M V, et al. Morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of myocarditis in two pigs infected by foot-and mouth disease virus strains of serotypes O or A[J]. Acta Vet Scand, 2014, 56:42.
[36] ONDRACKOVA P, NECHVATALOVA K, KUCEROVA Z, et al. Porcine mononuclear phagocyte subpopulations in the lung, blood and bone marrow:dynamics during inflammation induced by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae[J]. Vet Res, 2010, 41(5):64.
[37] LIU M L, FANG L R, TAN C, et al. Understanding Streptococcus suis serotype 2 infection in pigs through a transcriptional approach[J]. BMC Genomics, 2011, 12:253.
[38] UTHE J J, BEARSON S M D, QU L, et al. Integrating comparative expression profiling data and association of SNPs with Salmonella shedding for improved food safety and porcine disease resistance[J]. Anim Genet, 2011, 42(5):521-534.
[39] WANG F L, QIU H F, ZHANG Q D, et al. Association of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) receptor genes, CD163 and SN with immune traits[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2012, 39(4):3971-3976.
[40] NIU P X, SHABIR N, KHATUN A, et al. Effect of polymorphisms in the GBP1, Mx1 and CD163 genes on host responses to PRRSV infection in pigs[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2016, 182:187-195.
[41] BURKARD C, LILLICO S G, REID E, et al. Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs:Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function[J]. PLoS Pathog, 2017, 13(2):e1006206. |