不同单细胞全基因组扩增体系扩增牛微量血液DNA效果评价

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.08.017

Abstract

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the amplification effect of different single cell whole genome amplification (scWGA) systems on bovine trace blood genomic DNA by next-generation sequencing, and to establish a trace DNA whole genome amplification system. In this study, the whole genome of 1 ng blood genomic DNA of Huaxi cattle was amplified by MDA (multiple displacement amplification) and MALBAC (multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles) scWGA systems, and then the sequencing library was constructed based on the amplification products of the two systems and the original undiluted blood DNA. The whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using the DNBSEQ-T7RS sequencing platform. The amplification efficiency was evaluated by comparing the fragment's size, concentration and total mass of the amplified products. The amplification effects of the two systems were evaluated by analyzing GC content, average depth, consistent rate of typing and call rate. The results showed that the fragment of the amplified product in MDA system was larger than that in MALBAC system (8 kb vs.0.2-2 kb), the concentration and total mass of the product were significantly higher than those in MALBAC system (P < 0.05). Based on the sequencing data, the genome coverage of MDA system was significantly higher than that of MALBAC system at 1×and 5×sequencing depth(P < 0.05). In addition, the consistency of typing rate and call rate of MDA system were significantly higher than MALBAC system, while the allele drop rate and false positive rate of MALBAC system were significantly lower than MALBAC system(P < 0.05). In summary, this study revealed that the characteristics of two amplification systems of MDA and MALBAC were based on the DNA amplification of Huaxi cattle 1 ng blood genome, which provided a theoretical basis for improving the key amplification techniques in Huaxi cattle embryo genome selection and promoting the progress of Huaxi cattle genetics and breeding.

Key words: whole genome amplification, MDA, MALBAC, trace DNA amplification system

CLC Number:

S823.2

Yifan NIU, Chongyang LI, Baigao YANG, Peipei ZHANG, Hang ZHANG, Xiaoyi FENG, Jianhua CAO, Zhou YU, Youji MA, Xueming ZHAO. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Systems on the Amplification of Bovine Trace Blood DNA[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(8): 3436-3445.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 3

Table 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References 42

1	LAGE J M , LEAMON J H , PEJOVIC T , et al. Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH[J]. Genome Res, 2003, 13 (2): 294- 307. doi: 10.1101/gr.377203
2	WANG X Y , LIU Y P , LIU H N , et al. Recent advances and application of whole genome amplification in molecular diagnosis and medicine[J]. MedComm, 2022, 3 (1): e116. doi: 10.1002/mco2.116
3	姚雅馨, 喇永富, 狄冉, 等. 不同单细胞全基因组扩增方法的比较及MALBAC在辅助生殖中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2018, 40 (8): 620- 631.
	YAO Y X , LA Y F , DI R , et al. Comparison of different single cell whole genome amplification methods and MALBAC applications in assisted reproduction[J]. Hereditas (Beijing), 2018, 40 (8): 620- 631.
4	ZHOU X X , XU Y , ZHU L B , et al. Comparison of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in limited DNA sequencing based on tube and droplet[J]. Micromachines (Basel), 2020, 11 (7): 645. doi: 10.3390/mi11070645
5	DEAN F B , HOSONO S , FANG L H , et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002, 99 (8): 5261- 5266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082089499
6	ORDÓÑEZ C D , REDREJO-RODRÍGUEZ M . DNA polymerases for whole genome amplification: considerations and future directions[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24 (11): 9331. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119331
7	KHAN T , BECKER T M , PO J W , et al. Single-circulating tumor cell whole genome amplification to unravel cancer heterogeneity and actionable biomarkers[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23 (15): 8386. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158386
8	LU N , QIAO Y , AN P F , et al. Exploration of whole genome amplification generated chimeric sequences in long-read sequencing data[J]. Brief Bioinform, 2023, 24 (5): bbad275. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad275
9	PATRO S C , NIYONGABO A , MALDARELLI F , et al. New approaches to multi-parametric HIV-1 genetics using multiple displacement amplification: determining the what, how, and where of the HIV-1 reservoir[J]. Viruses, 2021, 13 (12): 2475. doi: 10.3390/v13122475
10	OSPINO M C , ENGEL K , RUIZ-NAVAS S , et al. Evaluation of multiple displacement amplification for metagenomic analysis of low biomass samples[J]. ISME Commun, 2024, 4 (1): ycae024. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae024
11	LIU Y , LIANG S M , WANG B , et al. Advances in single-cell sequencing technology and its application in poultry science[J]. Genes (Basel), 2022, 13 (12): 2211. doi: 10.3390/genes13122211
12	SHOJAEI SAADI H A , VIGNEAULT C , SARGOLZAEI M , et al. Impact of whole-genome amplification on the reliability of pre-transfer cattle embryo breeding value estimates[J]. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15 (1): 889. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-889
13	CHEN M F , SONG P F , ZOU D , et al. Correction: comparison of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in single-cell sequencing[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10 (4): e0124990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124990
14	HUANG L , MA F , CHAPMAN A , et al. Single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing: methodology and applications[J]. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet, 2015, 16, 79- 102. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025352
15	FU Y , SHEN X T , WU H T , et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease of spinal muscular atrophy by multiple displacement amplification: 11 unaffected livebirths[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2019, 16 (9): 1313- 1319. doi: 10.7150/ijms.32319
16	YAO K , GONZÁLEZ-ESCALONA N , HOFFMANN M . Multiple displacement amplification as a solution for low copy number plasmid sequencing[J]. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12, 617487. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.617487
17	RUAN Q Y , RUAN W D , LIN X Y , et al. Digital-WGS: automated, highly efficient whole-genome sequencing of single cells by digital microfluidics[J]. Sci Adv, 2020, 6 (50)
18	LAURI A , LAZZARI G , GALLI C , et al. Assessment of MDA efficiency for genotyping using cloned embryo biopsies[J]. Genomics, 2013, 101 (1): 24- 29. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.09.002
19	SOBOL M S , KASTER A K . Back to basics: a simplified improvement to multiple displacement amplification for microbial single-cell genomics[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24 (5): 4270. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054270
20	LU N , QIAO Y , LU Z H , et al. Chimera: the spoiler in multiple displacement amplification[J]. Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 2023, 21, 1688- 1696.
21	ARAKAWA K . Ultralow-input genome library preparation for nanopore sequencing with droplet MDA[M]. //ARAKAWA K.Nanopore Sequencing: Methods and Protocols.New York: Humana, 2023: 91- 100.
22	LUO C , FERNIE A R , YAN J B . Single-cell genomics and epigenomics: technologies and applications in plants[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2020, 25 (10): 1030- 1040.
23	VOLOZONOKA L , MISKOVA A , GAILITE L . Whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic testing in the era of massively parallel sequencing[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23 (9): 4819.
24	LI N , WANG L , WANG H , et al. The performance of whole genome amplification methods and next-generation sequencing for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2015, 42 (4): 151- 159. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.001
25	徐晓丽, 吴凌娟, 鄢仁祥. 单细胞全基因组扩增技术与应用[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2019, 46 (4): 342- 352.
	XU X L , WU L J , YAN R X . Single cell whole genome amplification technology and application[J]. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2019, 46 (4): 342- 352.
26	TRIPATHI J , ZHU L , NAYAK S , et al. Stochastic expression of invasion genes in Plasmodium falciparum schizonts[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13 (1): 3004. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30605-z
27	LU S J , ZONG C H , FAN W , et al. Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing[J]. Science, 2012, 338 (6114): 1627- 1630.
28	LIU N Q , WEN X J , OU Z H , et al. Case report: preimplantation genetic testing for X-linked alport syndrome caused by variation in the COL4A5 gene[J]. Front Pediatr, 2023, 11, 1177019.
29	DE BOURCY C F A , DE VLAMINCK I , KANBAR J N , et al. A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (8): e105585.
30	LASKEN R S . Single-cell sequencing in its prime[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31 (3): 211- 212.
31	ZONG C H , LU S J , CHAPMAN A R , et al. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell[J]. Science, 2012, 338 (6114): 1622- 1626.
32	MA J , GAO X , LI J Y , et al. Assessing the genetic background and selection signatures of Huaxi cattle using high-density SNP array[J]. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11 (12): 3469.
33	张莹, 吴兆海, 卜登攀. 育肥期华西牛蛋白质与能量需要量研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34 (12): 7886- 7894.
	ZHANG Y , WU Z H , BU D P . A study on protein and energy requirements of Huaxi cattle during fattening period[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34 (12): 7886- 7894.
34	LIU L , LI Y H , LI S L , et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2012, 2012, 251364.
35	SIDORE A M , LAN F , LIM S W , et al. Enhanced sequencing coverage with digital droplet multiple displacement amplification[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016, 44 (7): e66.
36	ZHOU Y , JIA E T , QIAO Y , et al. Low bias multiple displacement amplification with confinement effect based on agarose gel[J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2021, 413 (17): 4397- 4405.
37	LIU W Q , ZHANG H M , HU D , et al. The performance of MALBAC and MDA methods in the identification of concurrent mutations and aneuploidy screening to diagnose beta-thalassaemia disorders at the single- and multiple-cell levels[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018, 32 (2): e22267.
38	LYU L P , ASGHAR U , FU J Y , et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell genome sequencing techniques toward the characterization of germline and somatic genomes in ciliated protists[J]. Eur J Protistol, 2023, 88, 125969.
39	ZHANG X Y , LIANG B , XU X Y , et al. The comparison of the performance of four whole genome amplification kits on ion proton platform in copy number variation detection[J]. Biosci Rep, 2017, 37 (4): BSR20170252.
40	SRISUTHAM S , SUWANNASIN K , MATHEMA V B , et al. Utility of Plasmodium falciparum DNA from rapid diagnostic test kits for molecular analysis and whole genome amplification[J]. Malar J, 2020, 19 (1): 193.
41	BIEZUNER T , RAZ O , AMIR S , et al. Comparison of seven single cell whole genome amplification commercial kits using targeted sequencing[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11 (1): 17171.
42	CASPER R F . PGT-A: houston, we have a problem[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2023, 40 (10): 2325- 2332.

样品名称 Sample	浓度/(ng·μL^-1) Concentration	体积/μL Volume	总质量/μg Total mass
A	49.9	45	2.25
B	35.8	45	1.61
C	65.5	45	2.95

体系名称 System name	扩增产物浓度/(ng·μL^-1) Post-amplification concentration	体积/μL Volume	扩增产物总质量/μg Total mass	扩增倍数 Amplification multiple
MDA	138.67±14.43^A	50	6.93±0.72^A	6.1×10³~7.35×10^{3 A}
MALBAC	19.63±0.98^B	65	1.27±0.06^B	1.2×10³~1.31×10^{3 B}

样本名称 Sample name	原始数据/G Raw data	原始reads Raw reads	过滤后的碱基量/G Clean base	过滤后的reads数目 Clean reads	有效碱基比率/% Effective rate	Q20/%	Q30/%	GC/%
NC-A	68.75	229 182 528	68.75	229 028 205	99.93	97.29	92.28	42.72
NC-B	72.08	240 265 726	71.98	240 132 402	99.94	97.28	92.27	42.77
NC-C	65.32	217 735 046	65.21	217 602 659	99.94	97.21	92.07	43.15
MDA-A	86.45	288 158 236	109.88	366 596 150	99.94	96.56	90.30	41.88
MDA-B	111.18	370 586 573	60.65	202 316 763	99.94	97.81	93.61	41.79
MDA-C	103.68	345 605 125	73.80	246 140 648	99.94	97.40	92.58	41.69
MALBAC-A	110.05	366 826 265	86.31	287 837 233	99.89	96.65	90.58	42.69
MALBAC-B	60.73	202 436 895	110.98	370 296 021	99.92	97.13	91.85	42.85
MALBAC-C	73.89	246 290 038	103.49	345 336 461	99.92	96.93	91.32	43.16
小计Total	752.13	2 507 086 432	751.05	2 505 286 542
总体均值Average					99.93	97.14	91.87	42.52
Average

样本名称 Sample name	总reads数目 Total reads	比对reads数目 Mapped reads	比对率/% Mapped ratio	正确比对reads数目 Properly mapped reads	正确比对率/% Properly mapped ratio	重复率/% Dup ratio
NC-A	458 957 384	458 409 872	99.88	450 607 404	98.37	2.27
NC-B	481 227 738	480 697 245	99.89	472 836 054	98.45	2.15
NC-C	436 169 391	435 532 805	99.85	428 305 230	98.41	2.33
MDA-A	589 036 553	588 273 032	99.87	539 900 540	93.79	1.34
MDA-B	755 359 505	754 544 244	99.89	711 784 484	96.11	1.55
MDA-C	707 734 945	706 809 010	99.87	655 106 940	94.85	1.56
MALBAC-A	757 009 041	755 925 119	99.86	689 538 526	94.05	2.37
MALBAC-B	418 273 461	417 698 203	99.86	379 232 754	93.72	1.50
MALBAC-C	507 852 724	507 177 062	99.87	463 366 622	94.13	2.11
小计Total	5 111 620 742	5 105 066 592		4 790 678 554
总体均值Average			99.87		95.76	1.91
Average

对照组 Control group	扩增组 Amplification group	分型一致率/% Consistent rate of typing	分型一致位点数 Common loci	分型不一致位点数 Differed loci	检出位点数 Call loci	对照组缺失的位点 Control group drop loci
NC-A	MDA-A	97.91	11 352 029	242 889	11 594 918	37 974
	MALBAC-A	88.93	9 415 570	1 172 572	10 588 142	25 968
NC-B	MDA-B	98.07	11 404 499	223 896	11 628 395	33 366
	MALBAC-B	86.79	8 579 289	1 305 443	9 884 732	15 952
NC-C	MDA-C	97.89	11 391 983	245 867	11 637 850	39 855
	MALBAC-C	86.79	8 750 915	1 331 445	10 082 360	19 658

对照组 Control group	扩增组 Amplification group	扩增组缺失位点 Amplification group drop loci	两组同时缺失位点 Simultaneous drop loci in both groups	等位基因缺失率/% Allele drop rate	假阳性率/% False positive rate	检出率/% Call rate
NC-A	MDA-A	78 636	79 601	0.93	0.81	98.66
	MALBAC-A	1 085 412	91 607	4.88	4.46	90.02
NC-B	MDA-B	66 664	62 704	0.83	0.79	98.90
	MALBAC-B	1 810 327	80 118	7.19	3.67	83.97
NC-C	MDA-C	53 837	59 587	0.79	1.00	99.04
	MALBAC-C	1 609 327	79 784	6.81	4.14	85.67

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Systems on the Amplification of Bovine Trace Blood DNA

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 42

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LUAN Ya'nan, XU Danlei, GE Ming, TANG Zequn, ZHAO Xia, ZHANG Ruili. Study on the Involvement of Chicken Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5 Pathway in Bursa Injury of Chicken Induced by Infectious Bursal Disease Virus [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(10): 2557-2566.
[2]	LUAN Ya-nan，GE Ming，LI Guang-xing，XIE Wan-qiu，YANG Gui-jun，ZHANG Rui-li. The Expression and Location of chMDA5 in Chick Immune Organs [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2016, 47(7): 1480-1487.
[3]	WANG Cheng-cheng，GE Ming，LIU Chao-nan，LUAN Ya-nan，LI Guang-xing，ZHANG Rui-li. Dynamic Changing in the Expression of chMDA5 Signal Pathway Factors in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Chicken Infected with IBDV [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2015, 46(5): 830-835.
[4]	LIU Bao-jian, WANG Cun-lian, XU Ming-ju, WEI Dong, WANG Guo-hua, ZHANG Rui-hua, LIU Ying, XU Tong. Effect of Ginsenoside Rb1 on Oxygen Free Radicals in Acute Lung Injury of Mice Induced by H9N2 Swine Influenza Virus [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2013, 44(9): 1468-1474.
[5]	LI Hua;ZENG Yongqing;WEI Shudong;CHEN Qimei;SONG Yiping;QIAN Yuan;DONG Bin;CUI Zhifeng . Changes of Superoxide Dismutase Activity and Malondialdehyde Level in PostmortemMuscle and Their Association with Meat Quality in Pigs [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2010, 41(3): 257-261.
[6]	WANG Wen-kui;QI Yong-hua;CHENG Jia;LI Xue-lian;ZHOU Li-qing;GUO Na;ZHANG Ying;LIU Jin-ping;SONG Jin-xiang;BAI Jian. The Preventive Effect of LGZG Tang on Ascites Syndrome of Broiler [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2005, 36(11): 1215-1222.