畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 3925-3935.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.09.017
范广轩1(), 王天骄1, 董依萌1, 王洪亮1, 丁宁2, 王莘皓3, 邢秀梅1,*(
)
收稿日期:
2024-02-19
出版日期:
2024-09-23
发布日期:
2024-09-27
通讯作者:
邢秀梅
E-mail:2362416222@qq.com;xingxiumei2004@126.com
作者简介:
范广轩(1997-),男,河南卫辉人,硕士生,主要从事动物遗传资源研究,E-mail: 2362416222@qq.com
基金资助:
Guangxuan FAN1(), Tianjiao WANG1, Yimeng DONG1, Hongliang WANG1, Ning DING2, Xinhao WANG3, Xiumei XING1,*(
)
Received:
2024-02-19
Online:
2024-09-23
Published:
2024-09-27
Contact:
Xiumei XING
E-mail:2362416222@qq.com;xingxiumei2004@126.com
摘要:
旨在利用全基因重测序技术获得的SNP位点为吉林梅花鹿保种群构建分子系谱,并对其遗传结构进行分析。本研究在锯茸期采集保种群的吉林梅花鹿血液10 mL(n=425),其中成年公鹿132只、成年母鹿208只、仔鹿85只,提取DNA后进行全基因重测序。通过计算血源同源系数(IBD)分析吉林梅花鹿亲缘关系;基于观测杂合度(Ho)、期望杂合度(He)、多态信息含量(PIC)、系统发育树和群体分化指数(Fst)等对吉林梅花鹿保种群遗传结构进行分析。通过全基因重测序筛选出25 548 601个高质量SNPs,425个样本共组成了90 100对亲缘关系,平均亲缘系数为0.435 1,得出195对父子关系与143对母子关系,占到采样群体原始系谱记录的92%,检出原始系谱错误率为2.2%,纠正了原始记录错误8处,具有较高的准确性和可靠性;分析群体分化指数(Fst),东丰型吉林梅花鹿与伊通型距离较远;绘制系统发育树,将吉林梅花鹿保种群划分为17个家系;采用的SNP标记平均观测杂合度为0.456,平均期望杂合度为0.277,平均多态信息含量为0.627,吉林梅花鹿保种群平均近交系数为0.078,存在较弱的近交。本研究建立了吉林梅花鹿保种群的分子系谱并对其群体遗传结构进行了分析,这对于保护吉林梅花鹿遗传多样性和规划保种群后续选育计划至关重要。
中图分类号:
范广轩, 王天骄, 董依萌, 王洪亮, 丁宁, 王莘皓, 邢秀梅. 基于SNP位点的吉林梅花鹿分子系谱构建及群体遗传结构分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(9): 3925-3935.
Guangxuan FAN, Tianjiao WANG, Yimeng DONG, Hongliang WANG, Ning DING, Xinhao WANG, Xiumei XING. Molecular Genealogy Construction and Population Genetic Structure Analysis of Jilin Sika Deer Based on SNP Loci[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2024, 55(9): 3925-3935.
表 1
样品信息"
出生年份 Year of birth | 东丰公鹿/只 Dongfeng buck | 东丰母鹿/只 Dongfeng doe | 伊通公鹿/只 Yitong buck | 伊通母鹿/只 Yitong doe | 双阳公鹿/只 Shuangyang buck | 双阳母鹿/只 Shuangyang doe |
2015 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 6 |
2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
2017 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 22 |
2018 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
2019 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 17 |
2020 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 11 | 14 |
2021 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 18 |
2022 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 25 | 20 | 19 |
类型合计 Total number | 75 | 196 | 154 |
表 2
基于SNPs的部分吉林梅花鹿个体的遗传关系"
个体号 Individual number | 父本编号 Father’s number | PI_HAT | 母本编号 Mother’s number | PI_HAT |
21005 | D107 | 0.547 8 | D134 | 0.549 1 |
21007 | D107 | 0.536 5 | D012 | 0.546 1 |
21008 | D107 | 0.561 9 | D090 | 0.504 2 |
21036 | SY504 | 0.548 0 | SY758 | 0.559 0 |
21037 | D133 | 0.436 2 | 16006 | 0.445 2 |
21038 | SY504 | 0.545 2 | SY730 | 0.564 7 |
21039 | SY504 | 0.541 3 | SY770 | 0.555 9 |
21040 | SY504 | 0.553 4 | SY830 | 0.472 0 |
21041 | SY504 | 0.547 3 | SY822 | 0.542 0 |
21060 | DW031 | 0.538 3 | 17736 | 0.456 0 |
21062 | DW031 | 0.539 2 | 18016 | 0.383 2 |
22066 | 16063 | 0.545 0 | 17712 | 0.535 7 |
22067 | SY560 | 0.543 0 | 20080 | 0.510 0 |
22068 | 16063 | 0.553 6 | 17728 | 0.489 2 |
22069 | SY560 | 0.532 0 | 20074 | 0.512 2 |
22070 | SY504 | 0.540 3 | SY872 | 0.552 2 |
22075 | SY560 | 0.541 5 | 20078 | 0.509 0 |
表 5
17个家系的分布情况"
家系名称 Family name | 样本个数 No. of samples | 种公鹿数量 Number of bucks | 近交系数 Fis |
JL1 | 58 | 40 | 0.086 3 |
JL2 | 18 | 5 | 0.084 4 |
JL3 | 18 | 10 | 0.075 6 |
JL4 | 23 | 10 | 0.111 1 |
JL5 | 41 | 16 | 0.091 4 |
JL6 | 19 | 5 | 0.073 8 |
JL7 | 8 | 5 | 0.057 4 |
JL8 | 14 | 2 | 0.057 4 |
JL9 | 13 | 1 | 0.081 6 |
JL10 | 17 | 0 | 0.076 8 |
JL11 | 18 | 4 | 0.069 8 |
JL12 | 30 | 11 | 0.082 2 |
JL13 | 14 | 10 | 0.079 0 |
JL14 | 34 | 14 | 0.071 5 |
JL15 | 24 | 8 | 0.075 2 |
JL16 | 28 | 11 | 0.076 6 |
JL17 | 48 | 14 | 0.068 8 |
1 |
WANG I L , HSIAO C Y , SHEN J Y , et al. The effects of Jilin Sika Deer's (Cervus dybowski) tendon liquid supplementation on endurance drop jumps performance, biochemistry profile of free boxing players[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2019, 245, 112119.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112119 |
2 |
RADKO A , SMOŁUCHA G , KOSENIUK A . Microsatellite DNA analysis for diversity study, individual identification and parentage control in pig breeds in Poland[J]. Genes (Basel), 2021, 12 (4): 595.
doi: 10.3390/genes12040595 |
3 |
WOJCIECHOWSKA-KOSZKO I , MNICHOWSKA-POLANOWSKA M , ROSZKOWSKA P , et al. Improved RAPD method for Candida parapsilosis fingerprinting[J]. Genes (Basel), 2023, 14 (4): 868.
doi: 10.3390/genes14040868 |
4 |
LI J S , WU L Y , ZHANG H , et al. PCR-RFLP for detection of Fusarium graminearum genotypes with resistance to phenamacril[J]. Plant Dis, 2021, 105 (4): 889- 895.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1156-RE |
5 | 赵蒙蒙. 用于番鸭亲子鉴定的微卫星分子标记筛选[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2020. |
ZHAO M M. Screening of microsatellite markers for paternity ldentification of muscovy ducks[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
6 |
BROOKES A J . The essence of SNPs[J]. Gene, 1999, 234 (2): 177- 186.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00219-X |
7 |
WENG Z Y , YANG Y , WANG X , et al. Parentage analysis in giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) using microsatellite and SNP markers from genotyping-by-sequencing data[J]. Genes (Basel), 2021, 12 (7): 1042.
doi: 10.3390/genes12071042 |
8 |
SUN T H , SHAO Y J , MAO C L , et al. A novel quality-control procedure to improve the accuracy of rare variant calling in SNP arrays[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12, 736390.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.736390 |
9 |
COOPER D N , SMITH B A , COOKE H J , et al. An estimate of unique DNA sequence heterozygosity in the human genome[J]. Hum Genet, 1985, 69 (3): 201- 205.
doi: 10.1007/BF00293024 |
10 |
TANG M S , WANG T , ZHANG X F . A review of SNP heritability estimation methods[J]. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23 (3): bbac067.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac067 |
11 |
KRUGLYAK L . Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes[J]. Nat Genet, 1999, 22 (2): 139- 144.
doi: 10.1038/9642 |
12 |
唐修君, 樊艳凤, 贾晓旭, 等. 基于线粒体控制区的鸡不同杂交组合遗传多样性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52 (6): 1523- 1534.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2021.06.008 |
TANG X J , FAN Y F , JIA X X , et al. Study on genetic diversity in different hybrid combinations of chickens based on mitochondrial control region[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52 (6): 1523- 1534.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2021.06.008 |
|
13 |
董晓宇, 单文娟, 于丽娟, 等. 塔里木马鹿(Cervus elaphus yarkandensis)遗传结构及遗传多样性分析[J]. 生物技术, 2010, 20 (5): 16- 20.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-311X.2010.05.150 |
DONG X Y , SHAN W J , YU L J , et al. Structure of the mitochondrial DNA control region and population genetic diversity analysis of Tarim Red Deer (C.·e.·yarkandensis)[J]. Biotechnology, 2010, 20 (5): 16- 20.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-311X.2010.05.150 |
|
14 |
李正杰, 周先坤, 王浥尘, 等. 阿坝藏族羌族自治州若尔盖地区藏猪mtDNA D-loop的遗传多样性分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50 (12): 2387- 2399.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.12.003 |
LI Z J , ZHOU X K , WANG Y C , et al. Genetic diversity of Tibetan pig mitochondrial DNA D-Loop in Ruoergai Area of A'ba Tibetan and Qiang autonomous prefecture[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019, 50 (12): 2387- 2399.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.12.003 |
|
15 | 卜李那, 彭业博, 张春媛, 等. 基于祖源分析的猪遗传成分鉴定[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47 (2): 544- 553. |
BU L N , PENG Y B , ZHANG C Y , et al. Ancestry analysis of genetic components of pigs[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 47 (2): 544- 553. | |
16 |
XING X M , AI C , WANG T J , et al. The first high-quality reference genome of Sika deer provides insights into high-tannin adaptation[J]. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2023, 21 (1): 203- 215.
doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.05.008 |
17 | 卢凯妹, 王天骄, 董世武, 等. 梅花鹿基因组微卫星分布特征研究[J]. 特产研究, 2022, 44 (6): 8-15, 23. |
LU K M , WANG T J , DONG S W , et al. Research on distribution characteristics of microsatellites in Sika deer genome[J]. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 2022, 44 (6): 8-15, 23. | |
18 |
YUE G D , GAO Q , LUO L H , et al. The application of high-throughput sequencing technology in plant and animal research[J]. Sci Sin Vitae, 2012, 42 (2): 107- 124.
doi: 10.1360/052011-634 |
19 |
PURCELL S , NEALE B , TODD-BROWN K , et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2007, 81 (3): 559- 575.
doi: 10.1086/519795 |
20 | BOTSTEIN D , WHITE R L , SKOLNICK M , et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 1980, 32 (3): 314- 331. |
21 | ALHUSAIN L , HAFEZ A M . Nonparametric approaches for population structure analysis[J]. Human Genomics, 2018, (12): 25. |
22 |
LI R H , WANG X A , BIAN C , et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Sinocyclocheilus maitianheensis reveals phylogenetic evolution and immunological variances in various Sinocyclocheilus fishes[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12, 736500.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.736500 |
23 |
CHENG P L , HUANG Y , DU H , et al. Draft genome and complete Hox-cluster characterization of the sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus)[J]. Front Genet, 2019, 10, 776.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00776 |
24 |
VIGNAL A , MILAN D , SANCRISTOBAL M , et al. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics[J]. Genet Sel Evol, 2002, 34 (3): 275.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-34-3-275 |
25 |
YU G C , TANG Q Z , LONG K R , et al. Effectiveness of microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers for parentage analysis in European domestic pigs[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2015, 14 (1): 1362- 1370.
doi: 10.4238/2015.February.13.15 |
26 | HAUSER L , BAIRD M , HILBORN R , et al. An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2015, 11 (S1): 150- 161. |
27 |
REVERTER A , HUDSON N J , MCWILLIAM S , et al. Low-density SNP genotyping panel for the accurate prediction of cattle breeds[J]. J Anim Sci, 2020, 98 (11): 337.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa337 |
28 |
ZHU H H , ZHOU X . Statistical methods for SNP heritability estimation and partition: a review[J]. Computat Struct Biotechnol J, 2020, 18, 1557- 1568.
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.06.011 |
29 | ELBLINGER E , BOKOR J , BOKOR Á , et al. Parentage testing and looking for single nucleotide markers associated with antler quality in deer (Cervus elaphus)[J]. J Anim Sci, 2022, 65 (3): 267- 274. |
30 | CHRISTENSEN L G, MADSEN P, PETERSEN J. The influence of incorrectsire-identification on the estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values[C]//2nd World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production. 1982: 200-208. |
31 |
杨雨婷, 张兴, 牛安然. 基于高密度SNP标记重构猪多品种群体系谱[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53 (12): 4183- 4196.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.12.006 |
YANG Y T , ZHANG X , NIU A R . Rebuilding multi-species population genealogies based on high-density SNP markers in pigs[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53 (12): 4183- 4196.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.12.006 |
|
32 |
李玲, 李业芳, 梁奔梦, 等. 基于SNP标记的滩羊亲子鉴定研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53 (9): 2912- 2919.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.09.009 |
LI L , LI Y F , LIANG B M , et al. Paternity identification of tan sheep based on SNP markers[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53 (9): 2912- 2919.
doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2022.09.009 |
|
33 |
YANG H . Livestock development in China: animal production, consumption and genetic resources[J]. J Anim Breed Genet, 2013, 130 (4): 249- 251.
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12045 |
34 | 孙萍. 大尾寒羊保种群分子系谱的构建及遗传结构分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. |
SUN P. Construction of molecular pedigree and analysis of genetic structure of large tailed han sheep population[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
35 | 赵志达, 王欣悦, 石田培, 等. 基于微卫星标记鉴定湖羊家系[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2020, 47 (11): 3573- 3583. |
ZHAO Z D , WANG X Y , SHI T P , et al. Identification of Hu sheep family based on microsatellite markers[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 47 (11): 3573- 3583. | |
36 |
WANG X P , ZHANG H , HUANG M , et al. Whole-genome SNP markers reveal conservation status, signatures of selection, and introgression in Chinese Laiwu pigs[J]. Evol Appl, 2021, 14 (2): 383- 398.
doi: 10.1111/eva.13124 |
37 |
GUERRERO-CÓZAR I , PEREZ-GARCIA C , BENZEKRI H , et al. Development of whole-genome multiplex assays and construction of an integrated genetic map using SSR markers in senegalese sole[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10 (1): 21905.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78397-w |
38 |
RUNGE J N , KÖNIG B , LINDHOLM A K , et al. Parent-offspring Inference in Inbred Populations[J]. Mol Ecol Resources, 2022, 22 (8): 2981- 2993.
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13680 |
39 |
MACHMOUM M , BOUJENANE I , AZELHAK R , et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Arabian horse populations using microsatellite markers[J]. J Equine Vet Sci, 2020, 93, 103200.
doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103200 |
40 |
KING F J M , BANGA C B , VISSER C . Genetic diversity and population structure of three native cattle populations in mozambique[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2021, 53 (1): 117.
doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02562-0 |
[1] | 张瑞琪, 厐彦芹, 李再山, 尚秀国, 兰干球, 郭金彪, 赵云翔. 基于智能饲喂开展哺乳母猪采食量基因组遗传评估研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(7): 2890-2900. |
[2] | 段益欣, 张林云, 赵永聚. SNP遗传力估计方法、影响因素及其在畜禽育种中的应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1854-1865. |
[3] | 崔晟頔, 王凯, 赵真坚, 陈栋, 申琦, 余杨, 王俊戈, 陈子旸, 禹世欣, 陈佳苗, 王翔枫, 唐国庆. 利用GWAS和DNA甲基化共定位鉴定猪肉质性状的候选基因[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1945-1957. |
[4] | 孙雯莉, 王浩奇, 泽里磋, 高雨樊, 张非凡, 张健, 段梦琪, 商鹏, 强巴央宗. 藏猪促炎因子(IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α)多态性及其表达与免疫性状的关联分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1958-1969. |
[5] | 屠芸, 曾雅楠, 张蒸豪, 洪瑞, 王震, 吴平, 周泽洋, 叶艺茹, 杜亚楠, 左福元, 张龚炜. 保种场涪陵水牛及西南地区水牛品种间遗传结构与ROH分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1989-1998. |
[6] | 宋科林, 闫尊强, 王鹏飞, 程文昊, 李杰, 白雅琴, 孙国虎, 滚双宝. 基于SNP芯片分析徽县青泥黑猪遗传多样性和遗传结构[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 995-1006. |
[7] | 刘阳光, 章会斌, 文浩宇, 谢帆, 赵世明, 丁月云, 郑先瑞, 殷宗俊, 张晓东. 猪卵泡液外泌体处理卵巢颗粒细胞的SNP/Indel筛选分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(2): 576-586. |
[8] | 李在文, 李响, 李小伟, 李飙, 江明锋. 基于GBS简化基因组测序数据重建麦洼牦牛保种群系谱[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(9): 3710-3721. |
[9] | 白露, 王梦杰, 马小春, 何政肖, 谭晓冬, 刘杰, 赵桂苹, 文杰, 刘冉冉. 一种快速挖掘鸡品种特征性SNP标记集合的方法[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3252-3261. |
[10] | 杨晴, 巩静, 赵雪艳, 朱晓东, 耿立英, 张传生, 王继英. 芯片和重测序在猪遗传结构研究中的应用比较[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2772-2782. |
[11] | 王静琳, 刘阳光, 徐启隆, 陈朔, 邓在双, 程诗雨, 丁月云, 郑先瑞, 殷宗俊, 张晓东. 皖岳黑猪基因组遗传变异分析及特征SNPs挖掘[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2783-2793. |
[12] | 陈春, 康昭风, 魏岳, 黎观红, 武艳平, 谢金防. Wnt3a基因多态性与崇仁麻鸡皮肤毛囊性状相关性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2810-2823. |
[13] | 张任豹, 周东辉, 周李生, 高霄霄, 柳楠, 贺建宁. 基于70 K SNP芯片分析济宁青山羊保种群体的遗传结构[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2836-2847. |
[14] | 陶璇, 杨雪梅, 梁艳, 刘一辉, 汪勇, 孔繁晶, 雷云峰, 杨跃奎, 王言, 安瑞, 杨坤, 吕学斌, 何志平, 顾以韧. 基于SNP芯片的丫杈猪保种群体遗传结构研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2308-2319. |
[15] | 龙熙, 陈力, 吴平先, 张廷焕, 潘红梅, 张亮, 王金勇, 郭宗义, 柴捷. 合川黑猪保种群遗传结构及选择信号分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(5): 1854-1867. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||