影响非洲猪瘟病毒对培养细胞感染性的因素分析

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.08.025

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (8): 3406-3414.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.08.025

影响非洲猪瘟病毒对培养细胞感染性的因素分析

冯永智^1,2, 龚婷^2,3, 吴东东^1,2, 高琦^1,3,4, 郑晓宇^1,3, 张桂红^1,2,3,4, 孙彦阔^1,2,4*

1. 华南农业大学兽医学院国家非洲猪瘟区域实验室(广州), 广州 510642;
2. 广东省动物源性人兽共患病预防与控制重点实验室, 广州 510642;
3. 岭南现代农业科学与技术广东省实验室茂名分中心, 茂名 525000;
4. 农业农村部人畜共患病重点实验室, 广州 510642

收稿日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-08-23 发布日期:2023-08-22
通讯作者: 孙彦阔,主要从事猪病毒病的流行病学、病原致病性和疫苗等方面研究,E-mail:yankuosun@scau.edu.cn
作者简介:冯永智(1997-),男,山东潍坊人,硕士,主要从事非洲猪瘟病毒致病机制研究,E-mail:fyz@stu.scau.edu.cn
基金资助:
“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFD1800100）；广州市基础与应用基础研究项目（202201010490）；财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系、茂名实验室科研启动项目（2021TDQD002）

Analysis of Factors Affecting the Infectivity of African Swine Fever Virus on Cultured Cells

FENG Yongzhi^1,2, GONG Ting^2,3, WU Dongdong^1,2, GAO Qi^1,3,4, ZHENG Xiaoyu^1,3, ZHANG Guihong^1,2,3,4, SUN Yankuo^1,2,4*

1. National Regional Laboratory of African Swine Fever (Guangzhou), College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Animal-borne Zoonoses in Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China;
3. Lingnan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Guangdong Provincial Laboratory Maoming Branch, Maoming 525000, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Zoonotic Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510642, China 510642

Received:2022-10-31 Online:2023-08-23 Published:2023-08-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 猪原代肺泡巨噬细胞（PAMs）是非洲猪瘟病毒（ASFV）的主要靶细胞，除宿主单核/巨噬细胞外，ASFV难以在其他体外细胞系中持续生长繁殖。本研究旨在研究影响ASFV在体外感染能力的因素。通过比较ASFV接种易感细胞PAMs和非易感细胞系3D4/21、PK15细胞的全基因组转录谱差异；使用小分子药物改变细胞代谢或周期、物理方法改变细胞黏附；通过荧光定量PCR、Western blot、红细胞吸附检测病毒在3D4/21和PK15细胞系中的增殖情况。结果表明：ASFV接种3D4/21和PK15两种细胞与PAMs细胞的共同差异基因显著富集在细胞黏附、细胞周期和细胞代谢等方面；使用多种调控细胞周期、细胞代谢的小分子药物处理细胞后对ASFV感染PK15和3D4/21细胞的能力无显著影响；通过悬浮培养来调节细胞的黏附后，显著提高ASFV感染PK15和3D4/21细胞的能力，但随着传代次数的增加，病毒的复制能力逐渐下降。综上所述，细胞黏附可能是影响ASFV体外感染能力的重要因素之一，但是改变细胞黏附后并不能维持ASFV的复制能力。本研究为ASFV体外细胞系的建立提供了初步参考。

关键词: 非洲猪瘟病毒, 全基因组转录谱, 悬浮培养, 体外感染细胞系

Abstract: Porcine primary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) were the main target cells of African swine fever virus (ASFV), and it was difficult for ASFV to grow and multiply continuously in other in vitro cell lines except host monocytes/macrophages. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting ASFV in in vitro passaging cultures. By comparing the genome-wide transcriptional profile differences between ASFV inoculated susceptible cells PAMs and non-susceptible cell lines 3D4/21 and PK15 cells; Using small molecule drugs to alter cell metabolism or cycle, physical methods to alter cell adhesion; detecting virus proliferation in 3D4/21 and PK15 cell lines by fluorescence quantitative PCR, Western blot, red cell adsorption. The results showed that:ASFV inoculation of both 3D4/21 and PK15 cells and PAMs cells were significantly enriched in genes common to both cell adhesion, cell cycle and cell metabolism; The ability of ASFV to infect PK15 and 3D4/21 cells was not significantly affected by treatment of cells with various small molecule drugs that regulate cell cycle and cell metabolism; The ability of ASFV to infect PK15 and 3D4/21 cells was significantly affected by suspension culture to regulate The ability of ASFV to infect PK15 and 3D4/21 cells was significantly improved after cell adhesion was regulated by suspension culture, but the replication ability of the virus gradually decreased with the increase in the number of passages. In conclusion, cell adhesion may be one of the important factors affecting the in vitro infection ability of ASFV, but altering cell adhesion did not maintain the replication ability of ASFV. This study provides a preliminary reference for the establishment of ASFV in vitro cell lines.

Key words: African swine fever virus, genome-wide transcriptional profiling, suspension culture, in vitro infected cell line

中图分类号:

S852.659.1

冯永智, 龚婷, 吴东东, 高琦, 郑晓宇, 张桂红, 孙彦阔. 影响非洲猪瘟病毒对培养细胞感染性的因素分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3406-3414.

FENG Yongzhi, GONG Ting, WU Dongdong, GAO Qi, ZHENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Guihong, SUN Yankuo. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Infectivity of African Swine Fever Virus on Cultured Cells[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2023, 54(8): 3406-3414.

参考文献 22

[1]	SEREDA A D, KAZAKOVA A S, NAMSRAYN S G, et al. The attenuated ASFV strains MK-200 and FK-32/135 as possible models for investigation of protective immunity by ASFV infection[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(7):e0270641.
[2]	CHAPMAN D A G, TCHEREPANOV V, UPTON C, et al. Comparison of the genome sequences of non-pathogenic and pathogenic African swine fever virus isolates[J]. J Gen Virol, 2008, 89(2):397-408.
[3]	ALEJO A, MATAMOROS T, GUERRA M, et al. A proteomic atlas of the African swine fever virus particle[J]. J Virol, 2018, 92(23):e01293-18.
[4]	SALAS M L, ANDRÉS G. African swine fever virus morphogenesis[J]. Virus Res, 2013, 173(1):29-41.
[5]	KEßLER C, FORTH J H, KEIL G M, et al. The intracellular proteome of African swine fever virus[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):14714.
[6]	FAN Y Q, CHEN W Y, JIANG C G, et al. Host responses to live-attenuated ASFV (HLJ/18-7GD)[J]. Viruses, 2022, 14(9):2003.
[7]	TRAN X H, PHUONG L T T, HUY N Q, et al. Evaluation of the safety profile of the ASFV vaccine candidate ASFV-G-Δ177L[J]. Viruses, 2022, 14(5):896.
[8]	GÓMEZ-VILLAMANDOS J C, BAUTISTA M J, SÁNCHEZ-CORDÓN P J, et al. Pathology of African swine fever:the role of monocyte-macrophage[J]. Virus Res, 2013, 173(1):140-149.
[9]	AIT-ALI T, WILSON A D, WESTCOTT D G, et al. Innate immune responses to replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in isolated swine alveolar macrophages[J]. Viral Immunol, 2007, 20(1):105-118.
[10]	XIE C, WANG B Y, SHEN Z J, et al. Validation of the reference genes for the gene expression studies in different cell lines of pig[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021:5364190.
[11]	温灵燕. PK15细胞全悬浮摇瓶培养工艺初探[J]. 福建畜牧兽医, 2022, 44(1):1-3.WEN L Y. Preliminary study on suspension culture of PK15 cells in shaker flask[J]. Fujian Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 44(1):1-3. (in Chinese)
[12]	CARRASCOSA A L, BUSTOS M J, DE LEON P. Methods for growing and titrating African swine fever virus:field and laboratory samples[J]. Curr Protoc Cell Biol, 2011, doi:10. 1002/0471143030. cb2614s53.
[13]	GAUDREAULT N N, MADDEN D W, WILSON W C, et al. African swine fever virus:an emerging DNA arbovirus[J]. Front Vet Sci, 2020, 7:215.
[14]	VALDEIRA M L, BERNARDES C, CRUZ B, et al. Entry of African swine fever virus into Vero cells and uncoating[J]. Vet Microbiol, 1998, 60(2-4):131-140.
[15]	TABARÉS E, OLIVARES I, SANTURDE G, et al. African swine fever virus DNA:deletions and additions during adaptation to growth in monkey kidney cells[J]. Arch Virol, 1987, 97(3-4):333-346.
[16]	ENJUANES L, CARRASCOSA A L, MORENO M A, et al. Titration of African swine fever (ASF) virus[J]. J Gen Virol, 1976, 32(3):471-477.
[17]	KRUG P W, HOLINKA L G, O'DONNELL V, et al. The progressive adaptation of a Georgian isolate of African swine fever virus to Vero cells leads to a gradual attenuation of virulence in swine corresponding to major modifications of the viral genome[J]. J Virol, 2015, 89(4):2324-2332.
[18]	WANG T, WANG L, HAN Y, et al. Adaptation of African swine fever virus to HEK293T cells[J]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2021, 68(5):2853-2866.
[19]	PORTUGAL R, GOATLEY L C, HUSMANN R, et al. A porcine macrophage cell line that supports high levels of replication of OURT88/3, an attenuated strain of African swine fever virus[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2020, 9(1):1245-1253.
[20]	BORCA M V, RAI A, RAMIREZ-MEDINA E, et al. A cell culture-adapted vaccine virus against the current African swine fever virus pandemic strain[J]. J Virol, 2021, 95(14):e0012321.
[21]	MASUJIN K, KITAMURA T, KAMEYAMA K I, et al. An immortalized porcine macrophage cell line competent for the isolation of African swine fever virus[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):4759.
[22]	VENTRE M, NETTI P A. Engineering cell instructive materials to control cell fate and functions through material cues and surface patterning[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(24):14896-14908.

影响非洲猪瘟病毒对培养细胞感染性的因素分析

Analysis of Factors Affecting the Infectivity of African Swine Fever Virus on Cultured Cells

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘传霞, 王晓, 李雪雯, 鲍苗菲, 李婷婷, 陈欣, 翁长江, 郑君. 非洲猪瘟病毒pE120R蛋白单克隆抗体的制备[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(1): 388-394.
[2]	王慧, 冯保亮, 吴丹, 向光明, 王楠, 牟玉莲, 李奎, 刘志国. CD163基因在猪繁殖与呼吸综合征抗病育种中的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3127-3138.
[3]	刘桃雪, 苏冰倩, 齐艳丽, 郭江涛, 刘忠虎, 褚贝贝, 王江, 曾磊. 非洲猪瘟病毒p30蛋白单克隆抗体制备及其抗原表位鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(8): 3415-3423.
[4]	丁晓艳, 何久香, 周晓杨, 周伃欣, 李晋涛. 非洲猪瘟病毒感染相关调控基因以及毒力基因初步筛选[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(7): 2964-2971.
[5]	王映, 朱家宏, 赵加凯, 纪品品, 陈旭, 张路, 刘宝元, 孙亚妮, 赵钦. 抗非洲猪瘟病毒NP419L蛋白纳米抗体的筛选鉴定及其在抗体检测中的初步应用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2509-2520.
[6]	刘文豪, 朱彦策, 张冬萱, 王智豪, 张超. 稳定表达非洲猪瘟病毒E165R蛋白PK 15细胞系的构建[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(6): 2662-2666.
[7]	王国超, 赵亚茹, 张忠辉, 张玉龙, 白鸽, 耿抒贤, 樊洁, 杨吉飞, 关贵全, 殷宏, 罗建勋, 牛庆丽. 非洲猪瘟病毒RNA聚合酶亚基D205R基因生物信息学分析及多克隆抗体制备[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(5): 2042-2049.
[8]	张婷, 冯涛, 杨金柯, 郝雨, 杨行, 张大俊, 史喜绢, 闫文倩, 陈玲玲, 刘湘涛, 郑海学, 张克山. 条件性敲除D1133L基因的重组非洲猪瘟病毒的构建及增殖特性[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(2): 706-714.
[9]	张芳源, 杨大为, 仇德洋, 姜国骞, 李桂梅, 单虎. 非洲猪瘟病毒P30蛋白的表达及抗体液相芯片检测方法的建立[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(10): 4300-4310.
[10]	齐艳丽, 刘桃雪, 于海深, 张超, 鲁维飞, 王江, 褚贝贝, 张改平. 非洲猪瘟病毒p54蛋白单克隆抗体制备及其抗原表位鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2023, 54(1): 281-292.
[11]	王洋, 崔帅, 鑫婷, 王西西, 于海男, 陈世钰, 蒋亚君, 高新桃, 庞忠宝, 姜一曈, 郭晓宇, 贾红, 朱鸿飞. 非洲猪瘟病毒MGF360-14L靶向MAVS抑制Ⅰ型干扰素的产生[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(9): 3272-3278.
[12]	赵旭阳, 靳家鑫, 路闻龙, 张帅, 黄丽, 张改平, 孙爱军, 庄国庆. 非洲猪瘟病毒免疫逃逸分子机制研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(7): 2074-2082.
[13]	陈孝军, 马俊, 陈熊男, 梁祎凡, 高琦, 黄钊, 许润达, 郑佳琛, 郑泽中, 张桂红, 王衡, 龚浪. 1株非洲猪瘟病毒p30蛋白单克隆抗体识别的B细胞抗原表位的鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(7): 2239-2251.
[14]	袁兴国, 申超超, 赵登率, 杨博, 崔卉梅, 郝雨, 杨金柯, 陈学辉, 张婷, 张克山, 刘霞, 郑海学, 刘湘涛. β-雌二醇和孕酮促进非洲猪瘟病毒体外复制[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(7): 2252-2259.
[15]	李厚伟, 王蕾, 张先锋, 胡慧, 张真真, 张云飞, 刘林涛, 姬星宇, 胡永浩. 猪丁型冠状病毒在悬浮培养猪肾细胞LLC-PK1上的增殖特性分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(6): 2024-2028.