青绿甜高粱秸秆替代部分全价饲粮对鹅生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2017.03.011

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 483-491.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2017.03.011

青绿甜高粱秸秆替代部分全价饲粮对鹅生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

黄勇^1#，马娇丽^2#，王启贵¹，董国忠²，谢明³，侯水生³，刘作兰¹，汪超^1*

（1.重庆市畜牧科学院，荣昌 402460； 2.西南大学动物科技学院，重庆市牧草与草食家畜重点实验室，重庆 400716； 3.中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所，北京 100193）

收稿日期:2016-06-08 出版日期:2017-03-23 发布日期:2017-03-22
通讯作者: 汪超，E-mail:wangccq@foxmail.com
作者简介:黄勇(1963-)，男，四川资中人，硕士生，副研究员，主要从事动物营养与饲料研究，E-mail:huangyongcqbb@126.com；马娇丽（1990-），女，贵州威宁人，硕士生，主要从事动物营养与免疫研究，E-mail:947962628@qq.com。二者对本研究具有同等贡献，为共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家水禽产业技术体系专项基金（CARS-43）；国家公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303143）；重庆市农业发展资金（15402）

A Substitution Effect of Green Sweet Sorghum Stalks for Diet on the Growth Performance, Carcass Yields and Meat Quality in Geese

HUANGYong^1# , MA Jiao-li^2# , WANG Qi-gui¹, DONG Guo-zhong², XIEMing³, HOU Shui-sheng³, LIU Zuo-lan¹, WANG Chao^1*

(1.Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Rongchang 402460, China; 2.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Forage and Herbivores, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China; 3.Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Received:2016-06-08 Online:2017-03-23 Published:2017-03-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过研究青绿甜高粱秸秆替代不同比例的基础饲粮对四川白鹅生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响，探索建立利用青绿甜高粱秸秆替代鹅部分全价基础饲粮的饲喂技术。选取360只28日龄的四川白鹅（公母各半，(1.11±0.008) kg），随机分为对照组、试验I组、试验II组、试验III组、试验IV组、试验V组 6个处理组，每个组6个重复，每个重复10只鹅。对照组自由采食全价基础饲粮，不补饲青绿甜高粱秸秆；试验I~V组分别饲喂对照组日采食量96% 、92%、88%、84%和80%的基础饲粮，同时自由采食青绿甜高粱秸秆。试验至70日龄结束。结果表明：1）试验I、II组末重和平均日增重与对照组相比无显著差异（P>0.05），对照组、试验I组平均日增重显著高于试验III、IV、V组（P<0.05）。2 )试验I～V组屠宰率、胸肌率、腿肌率与对照组相比无显著差异（P>0.05）；与对照组相比，试验I~V组腹脂率均显著降低（P<0.05），试验I、IV和V组皮脂率显著降低（P<0.05），试验I~V组的肌胃指数均显著升高（P<0.05）。3）与对照组相比，试验I~V组胸肌粗蛋白质、肌内脂肪和肌苷酸含量均无显著差异（P>0.05），试验I~III组总氨基酸、必需氨基酸、鲜味氨基酸，饱和脂肪酸、不饱和脂肪酸含量均无显著差异（P>0.05）。综合考虑生长性能、屠宰性能和肌肉品质等指标，对于28~70日龄四川白鹅，利用青绿甜高粱秸秆替代部分全价饲粮是可行的，替代比例以4％~8%最好。

关键词: 青绿甜高粱秸秆, 四川白鹅, 生长性能, 屠宰性能, 肉品质

Abstract:

This experiment was conducted to study the substitution effect of green sweet sorghum stalks for diet on the growth performance, carcass yields and meat quality in geese, and explore the feeding technology using green sweet sorghum stalks substituting diet. Three hundred and sixty 28-day-old Sichuan White geese (male and female in half) with an initial average body weight of (1.11±0.008) kg were randomly allocated into 6 treatments (control group, experimental group I-V) containing 6 replicates with 10 birds per pen. The birds in control group was provided the basal diet ad libitum without the green sweet sorghum stalks; the birds in group I-V were fed 96%, 92%, 88%, 84% and 80% of basal diet fed in control group, respectively, and green sweet sorghum stalks were provided ad libitum. The experiment lasted until 70 days of age. The results showed that: 1) The final body weight and average daily gain in control group was not significantly different from those in group I and II (P>0.05), the average daily gain in control group and group I were higher than those in group III, IV and V (P<0.05). 2) No significant difference was observed in dressing percentage, breast muscle percentage and leg muscle percentage among the 6 treatment groups (P>0.05); compared with control group, abdominal fat percentage in group I-V and skin subcutaneous fat percentage in group I, IV and V were significantly decreased (P<0.05), the gizzard index in group I-V was significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05). 3) No significant difference was observed in the content of crude protein, intramuscular fat and inosine monophosphate in breast muscle among the 6 treatment groups (P>0.05); the content of total amino acids, essential amino acids, delicious amino acids, saturated fatty acids and unsaturated fatty acids in the breast muscle in group I-III were not different from those in control group (P>0.05). Collectively, it seems to be feasible to replace partial diet with green sweet sorghum stalks for geese, and 4％-8% of diet can be replaced with green sweet sorghum stalks without negative effects on growth performance, carcass yields and meat quality in Sichuan White geese from 28 to 70 days of age.

Key words: green sweet sorghum stalks, Sichuan White geese, growth performance, carcass yields, meat quality

中图分类号:

S835
S816.51

黄勇，马娇丽，王启贵，董国忠，谢明，侯水生，刘作兰，汪超. 青绿甜高粱秸秆替代部分全价饲粮对鹅生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(3): 483-491.

HUANGYong, MA Jiao-li, WANG Qi-gui, DONG Guo-zhong, XIEMing, HOU Shui-sheng, LIU Zuo-lan, WANG Chao. A Substitution Effect of Green Sweet Sorghum Stalks for Diet on the Growth Performance, Carcass Yields and Meat Quality in Geese[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2017, 48(3): 483-491.

参考文献

［1］宋增廷,王华朗,王立志,等.我国家禽非常规饲料资源的开发与利用［J］.动物营养学报,2015,27(1):1-7.
SONG Z T,WANG H L,WANG L Z, et al. Development and utilization of unconventional feed resources for poultry in China［J］.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015,27(1):1-7.(in Chinese)
［2］李兵.初产母羊补饲青贮甜高粱秸秆的生产性能试验［J］.新疆农业科学,2001,(S1):214-215.
LI B.Productive function of supplying silage of the sweet sorghum stalks to first parturition ewe［J］.Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2001,(S1):214-215. (in Chinese)
［3］白晶晶.青贮甜高粱秸秆饲料饲喂肉牛对比试验［J］.中国牛业科学,2015,41(1):37-38.
BAI J J.Contrast experiments on feeding beef with silage of the sweet sorghum stalks［J］. China Cattle Science,2015,41(1):37-38. (in Chinese)
［4］白晶晶.饲用型甜高粱秸秆青贮与玉米秸秆青贮喂羊对比试验［J］.畜牧兽医杂志,2015,34(2): 32-33.
BAI J J.Comparative test between silage of hybrid sweet sorghum stalks and corn stalks in sheep［J］.Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,2015,34(2):32-33. (in Chinese)
［5］杨宁.家禽生产学［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2002.
YANG N.Poultry production［M］.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2002. (in Chinese)
［6］胡民强,胡敏华.不同纤维水平日粮对肉鹅生产性能的影响［J］.农业现代化研究,2010,31(1): 118-120.
HU M Q,HU M H.Effects of different dietary fiber levels on production performance of meat geese［J］.Research of Agricultural Modernization,2010,31(1):118-120. (in Chinese)
［7］ELIMINOWSKA WENDA A,ROSIÑSKI G A,K?OSOWSKA D,et al.Effect of feeding system (intensive vs. semi-intensive) on growth rate,microstructural characteristics of pectoralis muscle and carcass parameters of the white Italian geese［J］.Arch Für Geflügelk,1997,61(3):117-119.
［8］莫兴荣,伍贤军.黑麦草养鹅的试验效果［J］.中国畜牧杂志,2000,36(4):40,48.
MO X R,WU X J.Effects of raising geese with ryegrass［J］.Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2000,36(4):40,48. (in Chinese)
［9］左瑞华,薄金水,程再琳,等.黑麦草对皖西白鹅仔鹅生长的影响［J］.湖北畜牧兽医,2006,(2): 38-39.
ZUO R H,BO J S,CHENG Z L,et al.Effects of ryegrass on the growth of Wanxi white geese［J］.Hubei Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,2006,(2):38-39. (in Chinese)
［10］刘林秀,谢明贵,谢金防,等.不同黑麦草饲喂量对兴国灰鹅育肥及屠宰性状的影响［J］.水禽世界,2009,(2):33-35.
LIU L X,XIE M G,XIE J F,et al.Effects of different ryegrass feeding amount on fattening and dressing performance in Xingguo grey geese［J］.ShuiQin ShiJie,2009,(2):33-35. (in Chinese)
［11］YU B,TSAI C C,HSU J C,et al.Effect of different sources of dietary fiber on growth performance,intestinal morphology and caecal carbohydrases of domestic geese［J］.Br Poult Sci,1998,39(4):560-567.
［12］韩娟,江栋材,王志跃,等.鹅对饲粮粗纤维的利用［J］.动物营养学报,2014,26(4): 868-876.
HAN J, JIANG D C,WANG Z Y,et al.Dietary crude fiber utilization of geese［J］. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2014,26(4):868-876. (in Chinese)
［13］SMITS C H,VELDMAN A,VERSTEGEN M W,et al.Dietary carboxymethyl cellulose with high instead of low viscosity reduces macronutrient digestion in broiler chickens［J］. J Nutr,1997, 127(3):483-487.
［14］SERENA A,BACH KNUDSEN K E.Chemical and physicochemical characterisation of co-products from the vegetable food and agro industries［J］.Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2007,139 (1-2): 109-124.
［15］VAN DER KLIS J D,VAN VOORST A,VAN CRUYNINGEN C.Effect of a soluble polysaccharide (carboxy methyl cellulose) on the physico-chemical conditions in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers［J］.Br Poult Sci,1993,34(5):971-983.
［16］史莹华,王成章,姚惠霞,等.不同类型粗纤维饲料对四川白鹅生产性能的影响［J］.动物营养学报,2010,22(6):1752-1756.
SHI Y H,WANG C Z,YAO H X,et al. Effects of different types of fibrous feeds on performance of Sichuan white geese［J］.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2010,22(6): 1752-1756. (in Chinese)
［17］GUY G,ROUSSELOT-PAILLEY D,ROSINSKI A,et al.Comparison of meat geese performance fed with or without grass［J］.Arch Für Geflügelk,1996,60(5):217-221.
［18］RAINBIRD A L, LOW A G.Effect of various types of dietary fiber on gastric emptying in growing pigs［J］.Br J Nutr, 1986,55(1):111-121.
［19］TIMMER R.The influence of diets containing different fiber sources on parameters of the bacterial flora in the gastro-intestinal tract of geese［C］//United Kingdom Branch of the World’s Poultry Science Association.Proceedings of 9th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition,1994:81-88.
［20］杨凤.动物营养学［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2002.
YANG F. Animal nutrition［M］.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2002. (in Chinese)
［21］AMERAH A M,RAVINDRAN V,LENTLE R G.Influence of insoluble fiber and whole wheat inclusion on the performance, digestive tract development and ileal microbiota profile of broiler chickens［J］.Br Poult Sci,2009,50(3):366-375.
［22］SVIHUS B.The gizzard:function,influence of diet structure and effects on nutrient availability［J］.Worlds Poult Sci J,2011,67(2):207-224.
［23］李杰,王安.纤维来源对肉鸡消化道发育的影响［J］.东北农学院学报,1993,24(1):98-100.
LI J,WANG A. Effect of fiber resources on gut size of broilers［J］.Journal of Northeast Agricultural College,1993,24(1):98-100. (in Chinese)
［24］STARCK J M.Phenotypic flexibility of the avian gizzard:rapid,reversible and repeated changes of organ size in response to changes in dietary fiber content［J］.J Exp Biol,1999, 202(Pt22):3171-3179.
［25］HE L W,MENG Q X,LI D Y, et al.Effect of different fiber sources on performance,carcass characteristics and gastrointestinal tract development of growing Greylag geese［J］.Br Poult Sci,2015,56(1):88-93.
［26］DORMITORIO T V,GIAMBRONE J J,HOERR F J,et al.Transmissible proventriculitis in broilers［J］. Avian Pathol,2007,36(2):87-91.
［27］RECKMEYER N M,VICKERS Z M,CSALLANY A S.Effect of free fatty acids on sweet, salty,sour and umami tastes［J］.J Sens Stud,2010,25(5):751-760.
［28］DAVIDEKF J,KHAN A W.Estimation of inosinic acid in chicken muscle and its formation and degradation during post-mortem aging［J］.J Food Sci,1967,32(2):155-157.
［29］BIELINSKI, et al.Effect of age on productivity,carcass value and quality of meat and fat in geese fattened on oats［J］.Rocz Nauk Zoot,1983,10(1):21-35.
［30］LIU H W,ZHOU D W.Influence of pasture intake on meat quality, lipid oxidation, and fatty acid composition of geese［J］.J Anim Sci,2013,91(2):764-771.
［31］KIRCHGESSNER M,JAMROZ D,EDER KLAUS, et al.Carcass quality and fatty acid composition in growing geese fed various rations［J］.Arch Für Geflügelk,1997, 61(4):191-197.
［32］张巧娥,敖长金.影响羊肉脂肪酸组成的因素［J］.畜牧与兽医,2007,39(3):19-21.
ZHANG Q E,AO C J.The factors affecting fatty acid composition in mutton［J］.Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2007,39(3):19-21. (in Chinese)
［33］WOOD J D,ENSERA M,FISHERA A V,et al.Fat deposition,fatty acid composition and meat quality:A review［J］.Meat Sci,2008,78(4):343-358.

[1]	王宇波, 许豆豆, 何鑫, 董冰, 尹靖东. 低蛋白饲粮缬氨酸水平对肥育猪生长性能、胴体性状和肉品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(9): 1832-1840.
[2]	刘一帆, 巨晓军, 章明, 屠云洁, 姬改革, 单艳菊, 邹剑敏, 束婧婷. 白条纹鸡肉和木质化鸡胸肉的发生特征及机理研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(5): 901-908.
[3]	刘一帆, 巨晓军, 章明, 屠云洁, 姬改革, 单艳菊, 邹剑敏, 束婧婷. 白条纹鸡肉和木质化鸡胸肉的发生特征及机理研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(5): 901-908.
[4]	蒲广, 黄瑞华, 牛清, 王欢, 范丽娟, 高琛, 牛培培, 张总平, 吴承武, 周娟, 李平华. 日粮脱脂米糠替代玉米水平对苏淮猪生长性能、肠道发育及养分消化率的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(4): 758-770.
[5]	蒲广, 黄瑞华, 牛清, 王欢, 范丽娟, 高琛, 牛培培, 张总平, 吴承武, 周娟, 李平华. 日粮脱脂米糠替代玉米水平对苏淮猪生长性能、肠道发育及养分消化率的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(4): 758-770.
[6]	赖星, 陈庆菊, 卢昌文, 马娅君, 唐志如. 日粮添加绿原酸和橙皮苷对断奶仔猪生长性能与肠道功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(3): 570-580.
[7]	赖星, 陈庆菊, 卢昌文, 马娅君, 唐志如. 日粮添加绿原酸和橙皮苷对断奶仔猪生长性能与肠道功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(3): 570-580.
[8]	霍路曼, 曹玉凤, 高艳霞, 李妍, 李秋凤, 李建国. 饲粮能量水平对荷斯坦育成牛生长性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(2): 332-342.
[9]	霍路曼, 曹玉凤, 高艳霞, 李妍, 李秋凤, 李建国. 饲粮能量水平对荷斯坦育成牛生长性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(2): 332-342.
[10]	黄文琴, 祁敏丽, 吕小康, 崔凯, 王世琴, 刁其玉, 张乃锋. 饲粮能量和蛋白质水平对21～60日龄湖羊生长、消化性能及血清指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(1): 105-114.
[11]	黄文琴, 祁敏丽, 吕小康, 崔凯, 王世琴, 刁其玉, 张乃锋. 饲粮能量和蛋白质水平对21～60日龄湖羊生长、消化性能及血清指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(1): 105-114.
[12]	周艳, 刁其玉, 董利锋, 邓凯东, 许贵善, 马涛. 饲粮非纤维性碳水化合物(NFC)与中性洗涤纤维(NDF)比例对育成期杜寒杂交母羊生长性能、营养物质消化率和甲烷产量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(7): 1405-1415.
[13]	周艳, 刁其玉, 董利锋, 邓凯东, 许贵善, 马涛. 饲粮非纤维性碳水化合物(NFC)与中性洗涤纤维(NDF)比例对育成期杜寒杂交母羊生长性能、营养物质消化率和甲烷产量的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(7): 1405-1415.
[14]	刘志云, 钟晓霞, 谢跃伟, 肖融, 江山, 黄健, 黄金秀, 周晓容. 发酵玉米-豆粕型全价饲料对生长猪生长性能、粪便臭味物质和菌群区系的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(6): 1169-1177.
[15]	董晓静, 崔凯, 马泽芳, 李建栋, 李迎梅. N-氨甲酰谷氨酸对育成期水貂生长性能、营养物质消化率、氮代谢及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(6): 1194-1203.

青绿甜高粱秸秆替代部分全价饲粮对鹅生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

A Substitution Effect of Green Sweet Sorghum Stalks for Diet on the Growth Performance, Carcass Yields and Meat Quality in Geese

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价