放牧与舍饲对彭波半细毛羊瘤胃细菌群落的生物学信息影响

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.11.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在通过不同蛋白质、非纤维性碳水化合物（NFC）和纤维素含量对瘤胃微环境细菌群落结构的影响研究，阐明瘤胃优势菌群结构的消长情况，清晰地了解瘤胃微生物对养分的依赖程度，以期为西藏传统放牧补饲及规模化养殖营养配比奠定理论基础。本研究选用年龄2岁左右，体重相近（（23.77±2.34） kg）的健康彭波半细毛母羊20只，放牧组及舍饲组各10只（每组各2个重复，每个重复5只）。采用凯氏定氮法、范氏（van soest）法和差值法分别测定放牧组可饲用牧草混合样、舍饲组饲草的粗蛋白、纤维素、NFC含量。饲养半年后，抽取瘤胃液，提取总DNA，构建重组标准质粒对瘤胃细菌进行绝对荧光定量（qRT-PCR）研究。结果：1）在门水平上，发现优势菌群集中在拟杆菌门，其在放牧组的丰度（（49.52±6.07）%）比舍饲组（（55.52±12.18）%）低6.00%，但差异不显著（P>0.05）；放牧组厚壁菌门的丰度（（43.28±4.59）%）比舍饲组（（36.68±9.78）%）高6.60%，两组差异显著（P<0.05）；放牧组螺旋体门的丰度（（1.99±1.75）%）比舍饲组（（0.76±0.59）%）高1.23%，两组差异显著（P<0.05）。2）通过PLS-DA和LEfSe分析发现，两组间均差异显著的主要细菌有：纤维素或其代谢产物主要依赖菌（放牧组）为假丁酸弧菌属（Pseudobutyrivibrio）、月形单胞菌属（Selenomonas）、粪球菌属（Coprococcus）、梭菌属（Clostridium）、厌氧弧菌属（Anaerovibrio）、毛螺旋菌科下一属（Shuttleworthia）、类普雷沃氏菌科下一属（CF231）、丁酸弧菌属（Butyrivibrio）、类普雷沃氏菌科下一属（YRC22）、毛螺菌属（Lachnospira）、毛螺菌科下一属（Moryella）；高蛋白和NFC或其代谢产物主要依赖菌（舍饲组）为脱硫叶菌属（Desulfobulbus）、奇异菌属（Atopobium）、韦荣球菌科下一属（p-75-a5）、普氏菌属（Prevotella）、布劳特氏菌属（Blautia）、瘤胃球菌属（Ruminococcus）和链球菌属（Streptococcus）。结果说明，合理蛋白质能量水平的饲料，不仅利于蛋白、淀粉依赖菌的增殖，也有利于主要纤维降解菌（瘤胃球菌属（Ruminococcus））和协同纤维降解菌（普氏菌属（Prevotella））的增殖。同时，舍饲组中纤维素分解菌（厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）和螺旋体门（Spirochaetes））的整体丰度值出现显著下降。

Abstract: The effect of different protein, nonfibrous carbohydrates(NFC) and cellulose nutritious ingredient on bacterial community structure in rumen microenvironment was studied. The aim was to explore the fluctuation of predominant bacteria in rumens, and to understand clearly the dependence of rumen bacteria on nutrients. It provided foundation for further study on scientific nutrition ratio for supplementary feeding under the traditional grazing and large scale breeding. Experiment was divided into 2 groups under traditional grazing and TMR fodder feeding, at each of which there were 10 Pengbo semi-fine wool ewes (2-year-old, 2 repetitions in each group, (23.77±2.34) kg of weight). The Kjeldahl, van soest and difference methods were used to determine the crude protein, cellulose and NFC content of forage grass mixed forage in the grazing group and forage in the feeding group. After half a year of feeding, the rumen fluid was extracted, the total DNA was extracted, and a recombinant standard plasmid was constructed to perform absolute fluorescence quantification(qRT-PCR) study on rumen bacteria. The results showed that:1) At the level of phylum, the preponderant population was Bacteroidetes, its abundance in grazing group((49.52±6.07)%) was 6.00% fewer than that in barn feeding group((55.52±12.18)%), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The abundance of Firmicutes in grazing group((43.28±4.59)%) was 6.60% higher than that in barn feeding group((36.68±9.78)%), the difference was significant(P<0.05). The abundance of Spirochaetes in grazing group((1.99±1.75)%) was 1.23% higher than that in barn feeding group((0.76±0.59)%), the difference was significant(P<0.05). 2) Analysis by PLS-DA and LEfSe revealed that the main bacteria that showed significant differences between the 2 groups were:the cellulose or its metabolites mainly depended on Pseudobutyrivibrio, Selenomonas, Coprococcus, Clostridium, Anaerovibrio, Shuttleworthia, CF231, Butyrivibrio, YRC22, Lachnospira, Moryella(in grazing group). The high-protein and NFC (in barn-feeding) or their metabolites mainly depended on Desulfobulbus, Atopobium, p-75-a5, Prevotella, Blautia, Ruminococcus and Streptococcus(in barn feeding group). The results indicated that the reasonable protein and energy levels in diet was not only beneficial to the proliferation of protein and starch-dependent bacteria, but also to the proliferation of main fiber-degrading bacteria (Ruminococcus) and synergistic fiber-degrading bacteria (Prevotella). Meanwhile, the abundance of cellulose decomposing bacteria (Firmicutes and Spirochaetes) had all declined obviously in barn feeding group.

中图分类号:

田发益, 武俊喜. 放牧与舍饲对彭波半细毛羊瘤胃细菌群落的生物学信息影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019, 50(11): 2252-2263.

TIAN Fayi, WU Junxi. Effects of Grazing and Barn Feeding on Biological Information of Rumen Bacterial Communities in Pengbo Semi-fine Wool Sheep[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2019, 50(11): 2252-2263.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2019.11.009

https://www.xmsyxb.com/CN/Y2019/V50/I11/2252

参考文献 31

[1]	RUSSELL J B,HESPELL R E.Microbial rumen fermentation[J].J Dairy Sci,1981,64(6):1153-1169.
[2]	BRYANT M P.Microbiology of the rumen[M]//STEVENSON M J.Duke's Physiology of Domestic Animals.9th ed.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press,1977:287-304.
[3]	OWENS F N,BERGEN W G.Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals:historical perspective,current understanding and future implications[J].J Anim Sci,1983,57(S2):498-518.
[4]	林波,梁辛,李丽莉,等.饲粮精粗比对泌乳水牛瘤胃细菌和甲烷菌区系的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(10):3101-3109.
	LIN B,LIANG X,LI L L,et al.Dietary forage to concentrate ratio affects ruminal bacterial and methanogen community composition of water buffaloes[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2016,28(10):3101-3109.(in Chinese)
[5]	NOCEK J E,RUSSELL J B.Protein and energy as an integrated system.Relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production[J].J Dairy Sci,1988,71(8):2070-2107.
[6]	LUDDEN P A,KERLEY M S.Amino acid and energy interrelationships in growing beef steers:I.the effect of level of feed intake on ruminal characteristics and intestinal amino acid flows[J].J Anim Sci,1997,75(9):2550-2560.
[7]	冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:341-344.
	FENG Y L.Ruminant nutrition[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004:341-344.(in Chinese)
[8]	FERNANDO S C,PURVIS II H T,NAJAR F Z,et al.Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2010,76(22):7482-7490.
[9]	靳继鹏,郭武君,张筱艳,等.冷季放牧补饲对甘肃高山细毛后备母羊瘤胃代谢参数及瘤胃微生物数量的影响[J].草业学报, 2018, 27(7):93-102.
	JIN J P,GUO W J,ZHANG X Y,et al.Impact of cold-season grazing and supplementary feeding on rumen metabolic parameters and micro-organisms in the ewes of Gansu Alpine Fine Wool Sheep[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2018,27(7):93-102.(in Chinese)
[10]	TAJIMA K,AMINOV R I,NAGAMINE T,et al.Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol,1999,29(2):159-169.
[11]	WHITE B A,CANN I K O,KOCHERGINSKAYA S A,et al.Molecular analysis of Archaea,Bacteria and Eucarya communities in the rumen-review[J].Asian-Australas J Anim Sci,1999,12(1):129-138.
[12]	裴彩霞.反刍动物瘤胃微生物及其利用[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2012:90-110.
	PEI C X.Rumen microorganisms and their utilization[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Science and Technology Press,2012:90-110.(in Chinese)
[13]	牛文静.全株小麦对荷斯坦公牛养分消化、瘤胃发酵及微生物的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学,2018.
	NIU W J.Effects of whole-crop wheat on nutrient digestion,rumen fermentation and microflora of Holstein bulls[D].Beijing:China Agricultural University,2018.(in Chinese)
[14]	BRULC J M,ANTONOPOULOS D A,MILLER M E B,et al.Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2009,106(6):1948-1953.
[15]	HIGHLANDER S K.High throughput sequencing methods for microbiome profiling:application to food animal systems[J].Anim Health Res Rev,2012,13(1):40-53.
[16]	焦金真,王芃芃,汤少勋,等.浏阳黑山羊胃肠道不同部位重要功能微生物的数量分布特征研究[J].畜牧兽医学报, 2013, 44(10):1590-1599.
	JIAO J Z,WANG P P,TANG S X,et al.Quantity and distribution characteristics of functional microorganisms in gastrointestinal tract of Liuyang black goats[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2013,44(10):1590-1599.(in Chinese)
[17]	WALKER N J.Real-time and quantitative PCR:applications to mechanism-based toxicology[J].J Biochem Mol Toxicol, 2001, 15(3):121-127.
[18]	李子健,李大彪,高民,等.不同生理阶段荷斯坦奶牛瘤胃细菌多样性研究[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(8):3017-3025.
	LI Z J,LI D B,GAO M,et al.Rumen bacteria diversity in Holstein dairy cows at different physiological phases[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2018,30(8):3017-3025.(in Chinese)
[19]	胡丹丹,郭婷婷,李娜,等.以16S rDNA高通量测序法研究果寡糖对奶牛瘤胃菌群结构及多样性的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医, 2018,45(10):2761-2771.
	HU D D,GUO T T,LI N,et al.Effect of fructooligosaccharide on the structure and diversity of rumen bacterial community in dairy cow by 16S rDNA sequencing technology[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2018,45(10):2761-2771. (in Chinese)
[20]	CROWLEY E J,KING J M,WILKINSON T,et al.Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing[J].PLoS One,2017,12(2):e0165779.
[21]	GARRITY G M,BELL J A,LILBURN T G.Taxonomic outline of the prokaryotes Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology[M]. 2nd ed.New York:Springer,2004:310-311.
[22]	CONNOLLY M L,LOVEGROVE J A,TUOHY K M.In vitro evaluation of the microbiota modulation abilities of different sized whole oat grain flakes[J].Anaerobe,2010,16(5):483-488.
[23]	杨琦玥,黄勇,陈亚冰,等.16S rRNA高通量测序技术筛选牦牛瘤胃细菌基因组DNA提取方法及菌群结构[J].中国农业科学, 2017,50(5):932-941.
	YANG Q Y,HUANG Y,CHEN Y B,et al.Screening of optimal DNA extraction methods and the bacterial community composition of yak rumen revealed by high 16S rRNA throughput sequencing[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2017,50(5):932-941.(in Chinese)
[24]	ZHANG J N,LI Y H,ZHENG H Q,et al.Direct degradation of cellulosic biomass to bio-hydrogen from a newly isolated strain Clostridium sartagoforme FZ11[J].Bioresour Technol,2015,192:60-67.
[25]	赵培厅,刘大程,高民,等.饲粮不同NFC/NDF对奶山羊瘤胃溶纤维丁酸弧菌、牛链球菌及埃氏巨型球菌含量变化的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2011,23(10):1716-1724.
	ZHAO P T,LIU D C,GAO M,et al.Effect of different dietary NFC/NDF on populations of B.fibrisolvens,S.bovis and M. elsdenii in rumen of dairy goats[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2011,23(10):1716-1724.(in Chinese)
[26]	周航.不同精粗比日粮对延边黄牛消化发酵和瘤胃微生物多样性的影响[D].延边:延边大学,2014.
	ZHOU H.The effects of diets with different concentrate to forage rations on digestibility,fermentation and microorganisms diversity in Yanbian yellow cattle[D].Yanbian:Yanbian University,2014.(in Chinese)
[27]	EVANS N J,BROWN J M,MURRAY R D,et al.Characterization of novel bovine gastrointestinal tract Treponema isolates and comparison with bovine digital dermatitis treponemes[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2011,77(1):138-147.
[28]	武心镇,高玉霞,欧海龙,等.奶牛瘤胃中反刍兽月形单胞菌的分离鉴定[J].动物医学进展,2008,29(10):25-28.
	WU X Z,GAO Y X,OU H L,et al.Isolation and characterization of Selenomonas ruminantium from the rumen of dairy cows[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine,2008,29(10):25-28.(in Chinese)
[29]	毛胜勇,龙黎明,朱伟云.体外研究反刍兽新月形单胞菌及与酵母联用对瘤胃微生物发酵的影响[J].草业科学, 2010,19(4):176-186.
	MAO S Y,LONG L M,ZHU W Y.Effect of Selenomonas ruminantium alone,or in combination with yeast cultures,on in vitro rumen bacterial fermentation[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(4):176-186.(in Chinese)
[30]	PETRI R M,FORSTER R J,YANG W.Characterization of rumen bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in concentrate fed cattle with and without forage[J].J Appl Microbiol,2012,112(6):1152-1162.
[31]	徐琴.饲粮和品种对山羊瘤胃微生物多样性的影响[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
	XU Q.The impact of ration and goat breeds on the composition and the relative abundance of microbial species in goat rumen[D]. Ya'an:Sichuan Agricultural University,2015.(in Chinese)