日粮纤维水平对鹅盲肠细菌多样性的影响

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.03.013

Abstract

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different dietary fiber levels on cecum microflora diversity of Carlos geese. Ninety healthy Carlos male geese with 35 days old were divided into 2 groups (n=45) with 3 duplicates for 15 per duplicate, and then fed with diets containing 5% (L group) or 8%(H group) crude fiber using alfalfa as the crude fiber sources, respectively. After feeding 42 days, caecum microflora was determined using MiSeq PE300 sequencing platform. The results showed that caecum microflora of goose in H group included 17 phylums and 199 genera, while caecum microflora of goose in L group included 19 phylums and 226 genera. The bacteria diversity of each sample between the two groups was similar (P>0.05). The relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia, Deferribacteres, Desulfovibrio, Prevotella, Helicobacter, Mucispirillum and Akkermansia of H group significantly increased compared to L group (P<0.05); The relative abundance of Synergistetes, Euryarchaeota, Bacteroides and Methanobrevibacter of L group significantly increased compared to H group (P<0.05). These results suggest that there is no significant difference in the bacteria diversity of cecum of goose fed with 5% or 8% crude fiber, however, the relative abundance of Desulfovibrio, Prevotella, Helicobacter, Mucispirillum, Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Methanobrevibacter are significantly different between the two groups.

CLC Number:

S835.5

ZHOU Hai-zhu, GAO Yun-hang, XU Bo, TAO Da-peng, TENG Zhan-wei, LOU Yu-jie. Effects of Different Dietary Fiber Levels on Bacteria Diversity in Cecum of Goose[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2018, 49(3): 565-571.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.xmsyxb.com/EN/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.03.013

https://www.xmsyxb.com/EN/Y2018/V49/I3/565

References

[1] 陈晓霞, 杨连玉. 日粮纤维构成对鹅营养物质利用的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017(18):59-60.
CHEN X X, YANG L Y. Effects of dietary fiber composition on the utilization of goose nutrition[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017(18):59-60. (in Chinese)
[2] 杨艳红, 龙向华, 吕景智, 等. 饲粮纤维对单胃动物肠道的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015, 51(5):81-85.
YANG Y H, LONG X H, LÜ J Z, et al. Effect of dietary fiber on intestines of monogastric animals[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 51(5):81-85. (in Chinese)
[3] 刘蓓一. 扬州鹅肠道微生物多样性及其受饲粮纤维水平的调控研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2012.
LIU B Y. Molecular diversity of microoanisms in the gut of Yangzhou geese and its consequences of dietary fiber level variety[D]. Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[4] 黄萌, 刘国君, 郭镇华, 等. 鹅消化道内微生态的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(7):78-80.
HUANG M, LIU G J, GUO Z H, et al. Research progress of goose gastrointestinal microbiota[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016(7):78-80. (in Chinese)
[5] KATO S, HARUTA S, CUI Z J, et al. Stable coexistence of five bacterial strains as a cellulose-degrading community[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71(11):7099-7016.
[6] 胡平, 施寿荣, 王志跃, 等. 采用变性梯度凝胶电泳技术研究不同形态玉米日粮对鹅肠道微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(1):169-175.
HU P, SHI S R, WANG Z Y, et al. Effects of different corn diet forms on intestinal microflora of geese by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(1):169-175. (in Chinese)
[7] 马凤莲. 饲喂不同纤维分解菌对鹅肠道菌群多样性的影响[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2012.
MA F L. Feeding different cellulolytic bacteria impact on intestinal microflora of geese[D]. Changchun:Jilin Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[8] 赫忠睿. 日粮纤维对吉林白鹅消化功能及微生物多样性的影响[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2015.
HE Z R. Effects of dietary fiber on digestive function and microbial diversity of Jilin goose[D]. Changchun:Jilin Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[9] 战利. 高水平日粮纤维对鹅肠道菌群多样性的影响及部分差异菌株的确定[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2012.
ZHAN L. Influence of high levels of dietary fiber on the goose road flora diversity and some difference strains were ditermined[D]. Changchun:Jilin Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[10] SHIN N R, LEE J C, LEE H Y, et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(5):727-735.
[11] MUYZER G, SMALLA K. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology[J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 1998, 73(1):127-141.
[12] LUO C W, TSEMENTZI D, KYRPIDES N, et al. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(2):e30087.
[13] DEGNAN P H, OCHMAN H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity[J]. ISME J, 2012, 6(1):183-194.
[14] POCKA J, REBECCHI A, PISACANE V, et al. Bacterial diversity in typical Italian salami at different ripening stages as revealed by high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons[J]. Food Microbiol, 2015, 46:342-356.
[15] 汪文强, 赵生国, 马利青, 等. 动物基因组学重测序的应用研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(10):1947-1953.
WANG W Q, ZHAO S G, MA L Q, et al. The research progress and application of resequencing based on animal genomics[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016, 47(10):1947-1953. (in Chinese)
[16] MAGOC T, SALZBERG S L. FLASH:fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies[J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(21):2957-2963.
[17] CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QⅡME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J]. Nat Methods, 2010, 7(5):335-336.
[18] 李红梅, 白林, 姜冬梅, 等. 基于16SrDNA高通量测序方法检测猪舍空气微生物多样性[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015, 51(3):81-84.
LI H M, BAI L, JIANG D M, et al. Microbial diversity of piggery air detected by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 51(3):81-84. (in Chinese)
[19] EDGAR R C. UPARSE:highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nat Methods, 2013, 10(10):996-998.
[20] 王晔, 于辉. 日粮粗纤维水平对鹅肠道发育和免疫器官指数的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2015(18):83-84.
WANG Y, YU H. Effects of dietary crude fiber level on intestinal development and immune organ index in goose[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2015(18):83-84. (in Chinese)
[21] 周映华, 胡新旭, 卞巧, 等. 无抗发酵饲料对生长育肥猪生长性能、肠道菌群和养分表观消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(3):870-877.
ZHOU Y H, HU X X, BIAN Q, et al. Effects of fermented feed without antibiotic on growth performance, intestinal flora and nutrient apparent digestibility of growing-finishing pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015, 27(3):870-877. (in Chinese)
[22] 孙翠丽, 张阁, 程汝佳, 等. 16S rRNA高通量测序方法检测羊圈空气微生物群落结构及多样性[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(7):1314-1322.
SUN C L, ZHANG G, CHENG R J, et al. Microbial community structure and diversity of sheepfold atmosphere by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2017, 48(7):1314-1322. (in Chinese)
[23] 张名爱, 王宝维, 龙芳羽, 等. 日粮纤维水平对鹅肠道正常菌群的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 36(2):159-162.
ZHANG M A, WANG B W, LONG F Y, et al. Effect of different fibre level diets on normal microbiological floras in goose intestines[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University:Natural Science Edition, 2007, 36(2):159-162. (in Chinese)
[24] GUO P, MOCHIDZUKI K, CHENG W, et al. Effects of different pretreatment strategies on corn stalk acidogenic fermentation using a microbial consortium[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102(16):7526-7531.
[25] AWATI A, KONSTANTINOV S R, WILLIAMS B A, et al. Effect of substrate adaptation on the microbial fermentation and microbial composition of faecal microbiota of weaning piglets studied in vitro[J]. J Sci Food Agr, 2005, 85(10):1765-1772.
[26] 王佳婧. 厌氧复合菌系的筛选及含纤维素原料预处理复合菌剂的研究[D]. 成都:中国科学院成都生物研究所, 2009.
WANG J J. Studies on screening anerobic microbial consortia and pretreatment of cellulose raw material by microbial agent[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009. (in Chinese)
[27] 李志鹏. 梅花鹿瘤胃微生物多样性与优势菌群分析[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2013.
LI Z P. The analysis of microorganism diversity and dominant bacterial communities in the rumen of sika deer (Cervus nippon)[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese)

Effects of Different Dietary Fiber Levels on Bacteria Diversity in Cecum of Goose

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Meng, LI Shangmin, SHEN Dan, HAN Guofeng, LI Yansen, DOU Xinhong, LI Chunmei. Effects of Dietary Different Whole-Plant Corn Silage Levels on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Geese [J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2021, 52(12): 3501-3511.
[2]	WANG Huiying, GUO Baodi, HE Daqian, GONG Shaoming, LIU Yi, LI Guangquan, XU Qi, CHEN Guohong. Effect of Dietary Methionine on Down Quality of Regeneration, Serum Indexes and Gene Expressions in Goose [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2019, 50(2): 323-331.
[3]	LUO Yi, LIU Zuo-lan, WANG Qi-gui, PENG Xiang-wei, WANG Yang-ming, XIE Ming, HOU Shui-sheng, LAN Yun-xian, WANG Chao. Effects of Dietary Energy Concentrations on Growth Performance, Egg Quality and Hatching Performance in Primiparous Laying Sichuan White Geese [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2018, 49(2): 439-448.